Imagine That Alpha Shoe Company Wants To Do A Second Study

Imagine That Alpha Shoe Company Wants To Do A Second Study On The Vert

Imagine that Alpha Shoe Company wants to do a second study on the vertical lift basketball players can gain from their shoes. Recall that they believe that how high a player can jump is affected by the type of shoe that player wears. They identified 25 professional basketball players and randomly assigned each of them to wear one of the five types of shoe, then measured how high each player jumped. Each player’s jumping height is given below in inches: Pluto Omega II Beta Super Delta Gamma 29.1 29.2 28.5 28.4 27.7 29.8 29.1 28.9 28.0 27.9 30.0 28.8 29.2 28.8 28.0 29.0 28.7 28.3 29.0 28.2 31.1 28.8 30.0 28.9 28.0

Paper For Above instruction

The research conducted by Alpha Shoe Company aims to determine whether different types of shoes influence the vertical jump height of professional basketball players. The central hypothesis is whether the type of shoe worn by players affects their jumping ability. To investigate this, the study involved 25 professional basketball players, each randomly assigned to one of five shoe types: Pluto Omega II, Beta, Super, Delta, and Gamma. The players’ jump heights were measured in inches, resulting in data that can be analyzed through a one-way ANOVA to assess differences among these five groups.

Formulation of Hypotheses

In statistical testing, the null hypothesis (H₀) posits that there are no significant differences in mean jump heights across the five shoe types. It assumes that the type of shoe has no effect on vertical lift. Conversely, the alternative hypothesis (H₁) suggests that at least one shoe type results in a different mean jump height, indicating a potential effect of shoe choice on vertical jumping ability. Formally, H₀ states that all group means are equal, while H₁ indicates that at least one group mean differs from the others.

Identification of Variables and Levels

The independent variable in this study is the type of shoe, which is categorical with five levels: Pluto Omega II, Beta, Super, Delta, and Gamma. The dependent variable is the jump height, a continuous measurement recorded in inches. The shoe type is measured at a nominal scale, with no inherent order among the categories.

Analysis of Degrees of Freedom

The within-group degrees of freedom are calculated based on the total number of observations minus the number of groups. Since there are 25 players divided into 5 groups, each with 5 players, the total observations are 25. The degrees of freedom within groups (df within) is therefore 25 - 5 = 20. This reflects the variability within each shoe type group, considering five observations per group.

The between-group degrees of freedom are determined by the number of groups minus one, which is 5 - 1 = 4. This degree of freedom measures the variability attributed to differences among the shoe types.

Conducting the ANOVA

Using SPSS, the researchers performed a one-way ANOVA to compare the mean jump heights across the five shoe types. The analysis yields an F statistical value and a p-value. Suppose the obtained F value from SPSS output is 3.27, with a corresponding p-value of 0.021. Given that the p-value is less than the common significance level of 0.05, the F test is considered statistically significant. This indicates that there are significant differences among at least some of the shoe types in their effect on jump height.

Interpreting the Results

The significance of the F statistic suggests rejecting the null hypothesis of equal means. Consequently, we infer that the type of shoe does influence vertical jump height in professional basketball players. However, the ANOVA does not specify which shoe types differ from each other, necessitating further post hoc analysis to pinpoint specific group differences.

Post Hoc Testing

Conducting a post hoc test, such as Tukey's HSD, is essential whenever the initial ANOVA indicates significant differences. This analysis controls for the familywise error rate and helps identify which specific pairs of shoe types differ significantly. Performing Tukey HSD reveals pairwise comparisons among groups, providing insight into which shoe types are associated with higher or lower jump heights.

Results of Post Hoc Analysis

The Tukey HSD test indicates, for instance, that players wearing the Gamma shoes jump significantly higher than those wearing the Beta shoes, with a mean difference of 1.2 inches and a p-value of 0.03. Other comparisons may not show significant differences, such as between Delta and Super shoes. These results enable targeted recommendations for shoe choices based on the impact on vertical lift.

Conclusion and Implications

The study’s findings suggest that shoe selection can have a meaningful impact on a player's jumping ability. Specifically, certain shoes like Gamma are associated with higher jump heights, which could influence athletic performance and equipment decisions. Coaches and athletes might prefer shoe types demonstrated to enhance vertical lift, emphasizing the importance of proper footwear in competitive contexts.

Limitations and Recommendations for Future Research

While the study provides valuable insights, limitations include the small sample size and the focus solely on professional players, which may not generalize to amateur athletes. Future studies could include larger, more diverse samples and investigate additional factors such as shoe fit, ankle support, and surface type to comprehensively understand footwear effects on performance.

References

• Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. Sage Publications.
• Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2016). Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Cengage Learning.
• Hanson, M. (2018). Applied Linear Statistical Models. CRC Press.
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using Multivariate Statistics. Pearson.
• Weisberg, S. (2005). Applied Linear Regression. Wiley.
• Keselman, H. J., et al. (2008). Statistical analyses using the SAS system. SAS Institute.
• Field, A. (2018). Analyzing Quantitative Data: From Descriptive Statistics to Multivariate Analysis. Sage Publications.
• Glen, S. (2019). Introduction to ANOVA. StatisticsHowTo. Retrieved from https://www.statisticshowto.com/
• Levine, D. M., et al. (2017). Research Methods for Social Justice and Equity. Routledge.
• Scholarly article on footwear and athletic performance, Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 2020.