Imogene King’s Goal Attainment Theory

Imogene King’s Goal Attainment Theory with Paragraph Headers

Understanding the foundational aspects of Imogene King's Goal Attainment Theory requires exploring her early life, the assumptions underlying her model, and the core concepts that define her theory. This paper examines King's biography, the basic premises of her model, how care is given through her nursing process, and the application of her theory in clinical practice.

Introduction

Imogene King was a pivotal figure in the development of nursing theories, primarily known for her Goal Attainment Theory. This theory emphasizes the dynamic interactions between nurses and patients, focusing on mutual goal setting and achievement. To fully appreciate her contribution, it is essential to explore her background, the assumptions guiding her work, and how her model informs nursing practice today.

Imogene King’s Early Life and Foundations of Her Model

Born in 1923 in Iowa, Imogene King pursued a comprehensive educational path in nursing, earning her diploma from St. John’s Hospital School of Nursing in 1945, followed by a Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) in 1948, a Master of Science in Nursing (MSN) in 1957, and ultimately a Doctor of Education (Ed.D) in 1961. Her extensive academic background provided her with a solid foundation for developing a theory rooted in human interaction and systems theory. Her model emerged from the interacting systems framework, emphasizing the importance of interpersonal interactions within the nurse-client relationship. King remained active in nursing until her death in 2007, continuously refining her model based on clinical practice and research.

Basic Assumptions of the Model

King’s Goal Attainment Theory is based on several central assumptions. Firstly, perceptions of both nurses and clients influence their interactions; each perceives the situation in unique ways that shape communication and behavior. Secondly, human beings are the primary focus of nursing, emphasizing human-to-human interaction rather than solely focusing on biological or physiological factors. An essential assumption is that individuals have the right to knowledge about themselves and to participate actively in health-related decisions—an especially progressive idea given the historically paternalistic medical models of her time.

King believed that health professionals must share information to empower patients to make informed choices, respecting their rights to accept or reject healthcare interventions. The theory also recognizes that the goals of healthcare providers and recipients may not always align, but through effective communication and mutual understanding, shared goals can be established. Further, individuals are seen as rational, social, and action-oriented beings capable of perceiving their environment and responding purposefully to stressors. These assumptions underpin her model, shaping her approach to nursing as a process grounded in interaction, mutual goal setting, and shared understanding.

Core Concepts of the Model

The central concepts of King’s model include perception, communication, transaction, role expectations, and goal achievement. Perception refers to how nurses and patients interpret their environment and each other, influencing their interactions. Communication is vital for exchanging information and building mutual understanding. Transactions are interactive processes where perceptions are validated, goals are negotiated, and action plans are developed. Role expectations involve understanding the responsibilities and behaviors expected from both nurse and patient, which must be congruent for effective interaction.

Goals are mutually determined by nurse and patient and represent desired outcomes related to health and well-being. The interaction process involves continuous feedback, allowing adjustments to be made to improve health status and meet established goals. The concepts work together within King’s three levels of interacting systems: personal (individual), interpersonal (small groups such as families), and social (large societal structures).

Application of Care Using the Nursing Process in King’s Model

In practice, King’s theory guides nurses through a structured process combining assessment, planning, implementation, and evaluation centered around goal attainment. The initial step involves assessment, where the nurse perceives and interprets the patient’s perceptions, feelings, and environmental influences. Understanding these perceptions involves both verbal and non-verbal communication, enabling the nurse to validate and refine their understanding of the patient’s needs.

Planning involves setting mutually agreed-upon goals based on the perceptions and needs identified during assessment. The nurse and patient collaboratively explore strategies and behaviors to achieve these goals, emphasizing shared decision-making. During implementation, actions are executed according to the mutually developed plan, with the nurse continuously observing and adjusting their approach based on feedback.

The final phase, evaluation, assesses whether the goals have been attained. If goals are unmet, further communication and adjustments in the care plan are necessary. The process is cyclical and ongoing, emphasizing the importance of dynamic interaction and mutual influence. This approach fosters respect, empowerment, and cooperation, ultimately leading to improved health outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Conclusion

Imogene King’s Goal Attainment Theory offers a comprehensive framework for nursing practice that emphasizes human interaction, mutual goal setting, and the importance of perceptions in achieving health outcomes. Her model is grounded in assumptions about human rights to information, active participation in care, and the dynamic nature of nurse-patient relationships. Proper application of her nursing process fosters effective communication, person-centered care, and collaboration, which are essential components of contemporary nursing practice. As healthcare continues to evolve, King’s theory remains relevant, offering guidance toward a holistic and participative approach to health promotion and disease management.

References

• King, I. M. (1981). A theory for nursing: Systems, concepts, process. Prentice-Hall.
• Alligood, M. R. (2018). Nursing Theorists and Their Work (9th ed.). Elsevier.
• Fitzpatrick, J. J., & Whitehead, D. (2000). Conceptual foundations of professional nursing. Prentice Hall.
• Meleis, A. I. (2011). Theoretical nursing: Development and progress (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
• Chinn, P. L., & Kramer, M. K. (2018). Integrated theory and knowledge development in nursing (9th ed.). Elsevier.
• Benner, P., Sutphen, M., Leonard, V., & Day, L. (2010). Educating nurses: A call for radical transformation. Jossey-Bass.
• Alligood, M. R. (2014). Nursing Theorists and Their Work (8th ed.). Elsevier.
• George, J. B. (2011). Nursing theories: The base for professional nursing practice. Pearson.
• McEwen, M., & Wills, E. M. (2019). Theoretical basis for nursing (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
• Carper, B. A. (1978). Fundamental patterns of knowing in nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, 1(1), 13-23.