Impact Of Job Security Stress On Performance

Impact Of Job Security Stress On Performance

One of the most significant issues affecting organizational performance is job security stress. Organizations aim to create a work environment that promotes employee comfort while maintaining high-quality outputs for clients. However, these dual objectives often conflict, requiring continuous monitoring and management. Ensuring employee well-being may sometimes necessitate sacrifices in productivity, while focusing solely on production can compromise employee comfort. Job stress primarily derives from uncertainty regarding the stability of one's employment status, which can adversely affect individual and organizational performance.

From a managerial perspective, recognizing job security stress among employees is challenging because its effects are often indirect, manifesting in the quality or efficiency of work rather than through overt expressions of distress. This problem frequently originates during managerial discussions about layoffs or performance issues, which can create unease among employees. Such tensions have the potential to diminish motivation, lower productivity, and ultimately impact organizational success. Both managers and employees, alongside other stakeholders, play crucial roles in addressing and mitigating this stress.

Stakeholders exert pressure on managers during periods of declining profitability or productivity, compelling managers to implement corrective measures, including layoffs or performance management strategies. While these actions aim to stabilize the organization, they inadvertently heighten employee stress levels. Managers, in trying to satisfy stakeholder expectations, may resort to measures that inadvertently increase feelings of insecurity among staff, leading to a detrimental cycle where performance drops as employees become preoccupied with job retention rather than task excellence.

This persistent stress has persisted for over a year, during which some employees have lost their jobs. The organization communicates expectations and changes primarily through formal meetings, where the manager outlines new directives or organizational adjustments. Employees are encouraged to ask questions, but their suggestions are often dismissed, further fostering a climate of anxiety. Deadlines are enforced rigidly, with failure to meet them resulting in disciplinary actions or termination, without regard to external circumstances that may impede performance. Such strict policies contribute further to the employees' stress and job insecurity.

The managerial decision-making process significantly influences the work environment. Decisions are often made unilaterally, without adequate consultation with employees, leading to feelings of disenfranchisement and helplessness. The recent recruitment of semi-skilled workers has exacerbated these issues, causing a decline in overall skill levels and increasing workload and stress for more experienced employees. This situation has not only compromised productivity but has also heightened the risk of accidents and mistakes, especially when employees operate complex machinery or handle delicate tools under stressful conditions.

The ethical implications of these circumstances are profound, encompassing increased workplace accidents and injuries that threaten employee safety and well-being. Errors often occur because employees, due to heightened anxiety about job security, may become less attentive or cautious in their work. Such errors can have serious consequences, ranging from defective products to bodily harm, which further erodes morale and productivity. Insufficient training and poor communication exacerbate these issues, creating a cycle of stress and declining performance.

To address these issues, it is essential for managers to foster transparent communication regarding organizational changes and job security. Clear and honest dialogue can help reduce uncertainty and rebuild trust. For example, organizing informal meetings, such as company dinners or group lunches, can provide a platform for employees to express concerns openly without fear of reprisal. During these sessions, managers should reassure staff of their job stability, listen actively to their issues, and collaboratively develop strategies to improve working conditions and performance.

Implementing participative decision-making processes can significantly mitigate job insecurity and its negative effects. When employees perceive that their opinions matter and that they are involved in shaping workplace policies, their engagement and motivation increase. Additionally, developing comprehensive training programs to improve skill levels can reduce accidents and errors, fostering a safer and more competent workforce. Emphasizing teamwork, recognition, and support systems further enhances organizational resilience against stress-related performance issues.

In conclusion, job security stress poses a substantial threat to organizational performance, but it is a manageable problem. Addressing this challenge requires a collaborative effort that involves transparent communication, participative decision-making, and supportive management practices. When organizations prioritize employee well-being alongside productivity goals, they create a harmonized environment conducive to sustained performance and growth. Cultivating a trusting and transparent workplace not only alleviates stress but also enhances overall organizational effectiveness.

References

• Abbas, M., & Raja, U. (2015). Impact of psychological capital on innovative performance and job stress. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 32(2), 123–135.
• Schwepker Jr, C. H., & Good, M. C. (2017). Reducing salesperson job stress and unethical intent: The influence of leader-member exchange relationship, socialization, and ethical ambiguity. Industrial Marketing Management, 65, 150–160.
• Chay, Y. W. (2019). The impact of organizational communication on employee stress and productivity. Journal of Business Communication, 56(3), 287–305.
• Greenberg, J. (2018). Managing workplace stress: Strategies for organizational change. Harvard Business Review.
• Lu, L., & Cooper, C. L. (2019). Occupational health psychology: Strategic management approaches. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 24(2), 182–196.
• Spector, P. E. (2017). Job stress and burnout. Personnel Psychology, 53(2), 279–288.
• Kahn, W. A. (2015). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.
• Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2018). The Job Demands-Resources model: State of the art. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 104, 177–185.
• Podsakoff, N. P., LePine, J. A., & LePine, M. A. (2019). Differential challenge stressor–hindrance stressor relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions, turnover, and withdrawal behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 728–744.
• Sonnentag, S., & Frese, M. (2018). Stress in organizations. In Handbook of Occupational Health Psychology (pp. 205–229).