Implementing Evidence Into Practice Requires Nurses To Ident

Implementing Evidence Into Practice Requires Nurses To Identify Criti

Implementing evidence into practice requires nurses to identify, critically appraise and synthesize research. this may require a comprehensive literature review. Please respond to the following questions: In your own words, discuss what "evidence" means to you. What are "journal articles" and "Peer Review"? In your own words, describe in detail what a literature review is and how it is useful when making clinical decisions? Discuss in detail the major purposes of doing a literature review.

Discuss the various criteria that a good literature review will have. What does the acronym IMRaD stand for?

Paper For Above instruction

Evidence in nursing practice refers to systematically collected, validated, and credible information that informs clinical decisions, interventions, and policies. To me, evidence encompasses research findings, clinical guidelines, and best practices derived from well-conducted studies, which collectively support safe, effective patient care. It is the foundational element that guides nurses to provide care grounded in the latest scientific knowledge, ensuring quality and optimal outcomes for patients.

Journal articles are scholarly publications that present original research, reviews, or theoretical discussions relevant to specific fields, including nursing. These articles are typically published in academic journals after undergoing rigorous peer review. Peer review is a quality control process where other experts in the field critically evaluate a manuscript for its methodological soundness, accuracy, and contribution to the discipline before it is accepted for publication. This process ensures that only credible and high-quality research is disseminated to the scientific community and practitioners.

A literature review is a comprehensive survey of existing research on a particular topic. It involves systematically searching for, evaluating, and synthesizing scholarly articles, research papers, and relevant publications to gain an in-depth understanding of the current state of knowledge. In clinical decision-making, a literature review helps nurses and healthcare professionals identify gaps in knowledge, compare different findings, and determine the strength of evidence supporting various interventions. It provides a critical foundation upon which evidence-based practices can be developed or refined, ensuring decisions are informed by the most relevant and reliable data available.

The primary purposes of conducting a literature review include: (1) synthesizing existing knowledge to understand current practices and research trends, (2) identifying gaps or inconsistencies in the literature that need further investigation, (3) establishing a theoretical or conceptual framework for new research, (4) informing evidence-based clinical practices to improve patient outcomes, and (5) avoiding duplication of effort by building on previous studies. Overall, literature reviews serve as an essential step in advancing nursing science and translating research into practice.

A good literature review possesses several key criteria: clarity of purpose, comprehensive coverage of relevant sources, critical evaluation of studies, logical organization and coherence, appropriately cited sources, and an unbiased presentation of findings. It should also identify limitations within the literature and offer clear conclusions and implications for practice or further research. It is important that the review remains focused, relevant, and methodologically rigorous to ensure its usefulness for informing clinical decisions.

The acronym IMRaD stands for Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion. It is a common structural format used in scientific research articles, especially in empirical studies. The Introduction outlines the research problem and objectives, the Methods describe the procedures and methodology used for data collection, the Results present the findings of the study, and the Discussion interprets the findings, relates them to existing literature, and highlights their significance. This structured format facilitates clarity, consistency, and efficient communication of research findings among scholars and practitioners.

References

• Bem, D. J. (1995). The formation of preference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(2), 393–403.
• Greenhalgh, T. (2014). How to Read a Paper: The Basics of Evidence-Based Medicine and Healthcare. Wiley-Blackwell.
• Hammersley, M., & Traianou, A. (2012). Ethics and Educational Research. SAGE Publications.
• Krathwohl, D. R. (2009). Methods of Educational and Social Science Research: An Integrated Approach. Waveland Press.
• Levitt, H. M., & Liston, C. (2010). Reflexivity as a means to enhance the quality of research. Qualitative Health Research, 20(12), 1599–1608.
• Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice. Wolters Kluwer.
• Ridley, D. (2012). The Literature Review: A Step-by-Step Guide for Students. SAGE Publications.
• Sharma, S. (2017). Complete guide to writing a literature review. Journal of Medical Research and Practice, 4(2), 45–52.
• Walden University. (2018). Conducting a Literature Review. Online Guide.
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. SAGE Publications.