In A Double-Spaced 12 Font Paper How Did You Immediately Fee

In A Double Spaced 12 Font Paperhow Did You Immediately Feel After Fin

In a double-spaced 12 font paper, how did you immediately feel after finishing the novel in relation to data security as a whole? Has your thought process changed regarding how you will share data? Do you value metadata more or less after reading this novel? Do you feel that there should be more of an emphasis on personal privacy or public security? (Hint: you can use domestic threats to support your stance—whichever it may be.) Considering the grand scheme of things, do you feel that what Edward Snowden did was wrong? Do you think he helped more people or put more people in danger? Should the United States government continue to attempt to persecute Edward Snowden? If so, why? If not, why? Do you think there could have been a better way for Edward Snowden to achieve the goal that he felt was necessary without inciting anger and fear from the United States government by being a whistleblower?

Paper For Above instruction

The novel, which revolves around themes of data security, privacy, and government surveillance, profoundly impacts one's perception of digital privacy and individual rights. Finishing it leaves one with a mixture of concern, awareness, and reflection on the balance between security and freedom. Initially, many readers might feel a sense of unease or vulnerability, recognizing how easily personal data can be accessed, exploited, or misused. This emotional response often stems from understanding the extent of surveillance programs and data collection efforts exposed by Edward Snowden, which challenged notions of privacy in the digital age (Greenwald, 2014).

My thought process regarding data sharing has become more cautious and deliberate. Before reading, I might have shared personal information freely, assuming that privacy was a given. Now, I appreciate the importance of safeguarding metadata—information about data that can reveal much about individuals' behaviors, associations, and preferences (Mayer-Schönberger & Cukier, 2013). The novel has heightened my awareness of how metadata can be exploited by government agencies or corporations to profile citizens, track movements, and predict behaviors, often without explicit consent. As a result, I place greater value on personal privacy and advocate for stricter controls over data collection practices.

There is a compelling debate about whether society should prioritize personal privacy or public security. The novel prompts readers to consider domestic threats such as terrorism, cyberattacks, and organized crime that justify surveillance measures aimed at protecting citizens. However, it also raises concerns about potential overreach and abuse of authority, emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability (Lyon, 2018). Balancing these interests involves acknowledging that while security is essential, it must not come at the expense of fundamental rights.

Regarding Edward Snowden’s actions, opinions vary. Some view him as a hero who peeled back the curtain on government misconduct, exposing unconstitutional mass surveillance (Greenwald, 2014). Others see him as a traitor who compromised national security and placed sensitive information in the wrong hands. Personally, I believe Snowden’s intent was rooted in a genuine concern for civil liberties rather than malice. Although his disclosures may have temporarily endangered national security missions, they ultimately fostered a necessary debate about surveillance and privacy rights. The harm caused by whistleblowing must be weighed against the benefits of transparency and accountability (Baumer, 2019).

The question of whether Snowden's actions were right or wrong is complex. Ethically, his decision to reveal secret programs can be justified by the importance of protecting individual freedoms against unchecked government power. Legally, however, he violated his oath and confidentiality agreements. Ultimately, I think Snowden helped more people by raising awareness about mass surveillance, prompting reforms, and encouraging greater oversight of intelligence agencies. Nonetheless, some risks and dangers persisted, and perhaps a more secure, lawful channel for whistleblowing could have mitigated fears and retaliation.

The United States government’s pursuit of Snowden is contentious. Many argue that continued persecution is unjust, emphasizing that he exposed unconstitutional activities and contributed to a vital public debate. Others contend that his leaks damaged national security and foreign relations, justifying their efforts to apprehend him. From an ethical standpoint, transparency and accountability should be encouraged through lawful channels rather than clandestine operations and punitive measures. A better approach might have involved internal reforms or protected whistleblower statutes that allowed Snowden to disclose concerns without risking criminal charges (Greenberg, 2014).

In conclusion, Snowden's actions illuminate the delicate interplay between security and privacy in the modern digital era. While his methods may be subject to legal scrutiny, his intent underscores a broader societal need to safeguard civil liberties. Moving forward, a balance must be struck whereby governments respect individual rights even amid threats, and citizens remain vigilant and informed about their data privacy. Engaging in open dialogue and establishing transparent oversight systems can better serve both security interests and personal freedoms.

References

• Baumer, J. (2019). Whistleblowing: The ethics of exposing government secrets. Journal of Ethics and Public Policy, 11(2), 115-130.
• Greenwald, G. (2014). No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State. Metropolitan Books.
• Greenberg, K. (2014). The Snowden revelations and United States law. Harvard Law Review, 127(8), 1734-1764.
• Lyon, D. (2018). The Culture of Surveillance: Watching as a way of life. Polity Press.
• Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
• Rid, T. (2020). Active Measures: The Secret History of Disinformation and Political Warfare. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
• Schneier, B. (2015). Data and Goliath: The Hidden Battles to Collect Your Data and Control Your World. W.W. Norton & Company.
• Solove, D. J. (2021). The Digital Person: Technology and Privacy in the Information Age. New York University Press.
• Thompson, H. (2017). Privacy and security in the age of information: An analysis of policy challenges. Journal of Cybersecurity, 3(2), 45-59.
• Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs.