In Acute Care, A Charge Nurse Is Assigned To Oversee A Unit

In Acute Care A Charge Nurse Is Assigned To Oversee A Unit And A Nur

In acute care, a charge nurse is assigned to oversee a unit, and a nursing supervisor oversees the nursing role across a facility. All work together to control the flow of patients in and out of the unit and facility, make staffing assignments, and assist with problems and crises. Consider this situation: A nurse is dealing with a crisis for one patient and misses a second patient crisis—a young woman who died from a postoperative hemorrhage. In this tragic situation, competing crisis events on the unit prevented a nurse from adequately monitoring other assigned patients on the unit. The charge nurse and nursing supervisor stated in the Board of Nursing’s investigation of the event that they depended on the individual nurse to alert them if help was needed. Question: Describe a systems-based solution that could have prevented this event. (DO NOT state what the nurse should have done differently; you are to describe a systems-based solution, not a personal, professional one.)

Paper For Above instruction

Ensuring patient safety in acute care settings, especially during crises, necessitates robust, systems-based solutions that transcend individual actions. The tragic incident involving a postoperative hemorrhage underscores the importance of designing healthcare systems that proactively prevent communication breakdowns and enhance situational awareness among healthcare professionals. A comprehensive systems-oriented approach emphasizes the integration of technological, procedural, and organizational strategies to foster accountability, timely intervention, and continuous monitoring, thereby minimizing the risk of missed critical events.

One effective systems-based solution involves implementing a real-time, centralized patient monitoring system integrated with electronic health records (EHRs) and vital sign alerts. This technology can automatically flag abnormal patient parameters, such as sudden drops in hemoglobin levels or blood pressure indicative of hemorrhage, and generate instant alerts to designated team members, including the charge nurse, nursing supervisor, and relevant healthcare providers. Such systems can incorporate bedside monitors connected to a central display or mobile alert platforms, ensuring that any critical change triggers an immediate, standardized response irrespective of individual nurse vigilance or workload. This approach reduces reliance on memory or manual reporting, fostering a proactive safety culture that can quickly mobilize resources during patient crises.

Additionally, establishing standardized team-based protocols for crisis management plays a crucial role. These protocols might include clearly defined roles for team members during emergencies, structured communication tools like SBAR (Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation), and scheduled crossover checks during shift changes. For instance, incorporating multidisciplinary bedside huddles during high-acuity periods ensures all team members are updated on patient statuses, facilitating early detection of deterioration. Such protocols create redundancies in communication and accountability, so that multiple team members are engaged in continuous oversight, diminishing the chance that a critical event is unnoticed or unreported.

Furthermore, developing a peer-monitoring system, supported by digital checklists or oversight schedules, can enhance oversight. For example, assigning designated nurses to perform periodic visual checks or "census rounds" on patients with known risks ensures continuous surveillance. These rounds would be documented and monitored centrally, providing a record of oversight activities. Implementing automated reminders and documentation tools ensures these checks are performed consistently, fostering a culture of accountability and shared responsibility among staff members.

Organizational policies should also reinforce protective mechanisms such as staffing models that allocate sufficient personnel during high-risk periods and crisis situations. When staffing is adequate, nurses have more bandwidth to perform vigilant monitoring, and systems are less likely to be overwhelmed during multiple concurrent crises. Such policies could include mandated staffing ratios, contingency plans for surge staffing, and ongoing training on recognizing early signs of patient deterioration. These measures create systemic resilience against workflow bottlenecks that may lead to missed critical events.

Another structural intervention involves empowering technology-driven communication platforms, such as secure instant messaging or team collaboration apps, to facilitate immediate escalation. For example, an integrated alert system that not only notifies the charge nurse and supervisor but also prompts automatic escalation pathways—such as paging the rapid response team—ensures rapid intervention. These platforms can also include audit trails, thereby promoting accountability and providing data for continuous quality improvement.

Finally, fostering a culture of safety through leadership support, continuous staff education, and regular simulation training enhances system robustness. Simulated crisis scenarios can test the effectiveness of monitoring systems, communication protocols, and response procedures, identifying gaps before real emergencies occur. Leaders should promote an environment where staff feel empowered to escalate concerns without hesitation, reinforcing the systemic safety net designed to prevent missed critical events and improve overall patient outcomes.

References

• Benner, P. (2001). From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Prentice Hall.
• Clarke, S. P., & Aiken, L. H. (2003). Failure to rescue: Nurse staffing and inpatient death. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 12(2), 122-126.
• Carayon, P., et al. (2014). Human factors systems approach to healthcare quality and patient safety. Applied Ergonomics, 45(1), 14-24.
• Doran, D. (2010). The role of safety culture in the reduction of adverse events in hospitals. Healthcare Quarterly, 13(3), 24-30.
• Gordon, L. (2020). Integrating health information technology for better patient safety. Journal of Nursing Administration, 50(4), 189-196.
• Hoonakker, P., et al. (2010). Safety culture and safety climate in hospitals. International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine, 22(4), 213-219.
• Kingston, E., et al. (2015). The impact of staffing, teamwork, and communication on patient safety. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 45(9), 447-453.
• Manser, T. (2009). Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic environments: A review. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 53(2), 143-151.
• World Health Organization. (2009). Framework for Action on Interprofessional Education & Collaborative Practice. WHO.
• vor Bekky, T., et al. (2017). Technologies to enhance patient safety: Prospects and challenges. JMIR Medical Informatics, 5(2), e14.