In Addition To The Topic Study Materials, Use The Cha 198306

In Addition To The Topic Study Materials Use The Chart You Completed

In addition to the topic study materials, use the chart you completed and questions you answered in the Topic 3 about "Case Study: Healing and Autonomy" as the basis for your responses in this assignment. Answer the following questions about a patient's spiritual needs in light of the Christian worldview. In words, respond to the following: Should the physician allow Mike to continue making decisions that seem to him to be irrational and harmful to James, or would that mean a disrespect of a patient's autonomy? Explain your rationale. In words, respond to the following: How ought the Christian think about sickness and health?

How should a Christian think about medical intervention? What should Mike as a Christian do? How should he reason about trusting God and treating James in relation to what is truly honoring the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence in James's care? In words, respond to the following: How would a spiritual needs assessment help the physician assist Mike determine appropriate interventions for James and for his family or others involved in his care? Remember to support your responses with the topic study materials.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. Benchmark Information This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies: BS in Health Sciences 1.2; BS Nursing (RN to BSN) 5.2 Assess for the spiritual needs and provide appropriate interventions for individuals, families, and groups.

Paper For Above instruction

The ethical dilemma presented in the case study involving Mike, James, and the physician highlights crucial aspects of patient autonomy, spiritual considerations, and the role of faith in medical decision-making within a Christian worldview. The core of the discussion revolves around whether the physician should respect Mike’s decisions, which may appear irrational or potentially harmful to James, or whether such respect would contravene the principle of respecting patient autonomy.

Patient autonomy is a foundational concept in biomedical ethics, emphasizing respect for individuals' rights to make decisions about their own health care. However, this principle becomes complex when the patient's spiritual beliefs influence decision-making, especially in cases where those beliefs might conflict with medical advice or evidence-based interventions. From a Christian perspective, autonomy must be balanced with compassion, beneficence, and respect for divine sovereignty—recognizing that God's will encompasses healing and suffering (Packer, 2016).

In this context, allowing Mike to continue making decisions that could harm James might be viewed as a disservice to James’s well-being and could challenge the moral obligation of beneficence—acting in the patient’s best interest—and nonmaleficence—avoiding harm (Beauchamp & Childress, 2013). Nonetheless, Christians are called to respect individual agency, recognizing that spiritual matters significantly influence health decisions. A nuanced approach should involve open dialogue, integrating spiritual assessments to comprehensively understand the patient's and family's values and beliefs—thereby facilitating ethically grounded, spiritually sensitive care (Puchalski et al., 2014).

The Christian view of sickness and health is multifaceted, viewing health as a gift from God that should be stewarded responsibly, while acknowledging suffering as a potential means for spiritual growth and reliance on divine grace (Timmerman, 2012). Christians believe that disease and health are not solely physical phenomena but also spiritual states that often require holistic intervention—addressing body, mind, and spirit (Puchalski & Ferrell, 2010). This perspective influences how Christians approach medical interventions, emphasizing prayer, faith, and the seeking of divine guidance alongside medical treatment.

For Mike, as a Christian, trusting God entails walking in faith and seeking divine wisdom in every decision, including pain management or discontinuing treatment. Nonetheless, this trust does not negate the moral responsibility to care for James practically, using available medical interventions that align with their faith. Christian reasoners emphasize that trust in God should inspire hope and humility, recognizing human limitations and the sovereignty of divine providence (Nouwen, 2014). Accordingly, Mike should consult with healthcare professionals, engage in spiritual discernment, and prayerfully consider what best honors God's principles of love, mercy, and justice in James’s care (Kerr & Murphy, 2019).

A spiritual needs assessment can profoundly assist physicians in understanding the spiritual dimensions influencing family members' and patients' healthcare decisions (Patterson & Koenig, 2014). Such assessment tools systematically explore beliefs, values, and spiritual resources, providing critical insights that inform culturally and spiritually sensitive interventions. By incorporating spiritual assessments, healthcare providers can create a supportive environment that respects religious convictions, facilitates trust, and enhances compliance with agreed-upon treatments. For Mike, this process can clarify spiritual concerns, reconcile faith-based perspectives with medical realities, and foster mutual understanding—ultimately leading to more compassionate and effective care decisions (Koenig & King, 2014).

In conclusion, respecting patient autonomy within a Christian framework requires careful balancing of religious beliefs, spiritual needs, and ethical principles. While protecting James’s health and well-being is paramount, acknowledging Mike’s faith and spiritual worldview fosters compassionate, holistic care. Spiritual needs assessments serve as vital tools for enabling healthcare providers to meet spiritual needs, promote healing, and uphold the dignity of individuals as created in God's image (Watson et al., 2012). Ultimately, integrating spiritual care into medical practice embodies the Christian ethic of love and respect, aligning healthcare decisions with divine principles as well as patient-centered care standards.

References

• Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (7th ed.). Oxford University Press.
• Kerr, S., & Murphy, D. (2019). Faith in Healthcare: Fostering Spirituality for Holistic Healing. Journal of Christian Nursing, 36(2), 85-90.
• Koenig, H. G., & King, D. E. (2014). Religion, spirituality, and health: The research and clinical implications. ISRN Psychiatry, 2014, Article 278020.
• Packer, J. (2016). Knowing God. InterVarsity Press.
• Patterson, P., & Koenig, H. G. (2014). Spirituality and health: What we know and what we need to know. Journal of Religion and Health, 53(2), 385-396.
• Puchalski, C., & Ferrell, B. (2010). Making health care Whole: Integrating Spirituality into Patient Care. Templeton Foundation Press.
• Puchalski, C. M., et al. (2014). Spiritual assessment in clinical practice. The Annals of Family Medicine, 12(4), 356-363.
• Timmerman, B. (2012). The Christian response to suffering: Faith-based approaches to healing. Christian Medical Journal, 89(4), 22-25.
• Nouwen, H. J. (2014). The Wounded Healer: Ministry in Contemporary Society. Image.
• Watson, J., et al. (2012). Spirituality and nursing: A concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68(3), 599-611.