In-Class Assignment 1: XSU Spring Concert You Are A Member

In Class Assignment 1 Xsu Spring Concertyou Are A Member

You are a member of the X State University (XSU) student body entertainment committee. Your committee has agreed to sponsor a spring concert. The motive behind this concert is to offer a safe alternative to Hasta Weekend, an event involving heavy partying that has resulted in accidents. You have a preliminary scope for an eight-hour concert at Wahoo Stadium on the last Saturday in May, with a budget not exceeding $50,000, including local advertising, security, food, souvenirs, licenses, and sponsorships. Key milestones include securing permissions by January 15, confirming artists by February 15, completing the artist roster by April 1, and finalizing vendor contracts by April 15. Technical requirements include a professional sound system, at least one big-name artist, at least seven performing acts, restroom facilities for 10,000, parking for 1,000 cars, and compliance with city and institutional ordinances. The concert must end by 11:30 p.m. The assignment involves identifying five potential risks, using at least two risk identification techniques other than brainstorming, and discussing their causes, impacts, and the techniques used.

Paper For Above instruction

The successful organization of the XSU spring concert necessitates careful risk management to ensure safety, adherence to budget, and overall event success. Identifying potential risks early allows the planning committee to implement mitigation strategies, thereby minimizing disruptions or adverse outcomes. This essay discusses five potential risks associated with the event, examines their causes and impacts, and utilizes two risk identification techniques: Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) and Expert Judgment.

Risk 1: Permitting and Regulatory Approval Failure

Event: Delays in securing necessary permits and approvals from local authorities or the university.

Cause: Bureaucratic delays, incomplete documentation, or misunderstandings of regulations.

Impact: Postponement or cancellation of the event, potential fines, legal issues, and damage to the committee’s reputation.

Technique Used: Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), which maps out the causes leading to the failure in obtaining permits, helps identify critical points requiring proactive attention.

Risk 2: Artist Cancellation

Event: The big-name artist or supporting acts cancel their performances due to unforeseen circumstances.

Cause: Illness, travel disruptions, contractual disputes, or conflicts with other commitments.

Impact: Reduced attraction for attendees, financial losses, or need for urgent re-booking, which might increase costs or reduce program quality.

Technique Used: Expert Judgment, consulting industry professionals and past event organizers to forecast potential cancellations and pre-emptively prepare alternative acts or contingency plans.

Risk 3: Insufficient Attendance

Event: Lower than expected ticket sales or attendance, leading to inadequate revenue to cover costs.

Cause: Poor marketing, competing events, weather conditions, or low interest among students.

Impact: Budget overruns, financial losses, and reduced morale among planning staff.

Technique Used: SWOT Analysis to evaluate internal and external factors influencing attendance, enabling targeted marketing strategies.

Risk 4: Security and Safety Incidents

Event: Incidents such as altercations, substance abuse issues, or medical emergencies during the concert.

Cause: Inadequate security measures, lack of crowd control, or unforeseen health issues.

Impact: Harm to attendees, legal liabilities, reputational damage, and possible shutdown of the event by authorities.

Technique Used: Delphi Technique, gathering expert opinions from security professionals and medical personnel to identify risks and plan appropriate responses.

Risk 5: Technical Failures

Event: Sound system failure, power outage, or other technical issues affecting the concert’s performance.

Cause: Equipment malfunction, inadequate maintenance, or power grid issues.

Impact: Disruption of performances, dissatisfaction among attendees, and potential financial losses.

Technique Used: Checklists and expert consultation for technical readiness assessments ensuring equipment functionality and backup plans.

Conclusion

Effective risk management for the XSU spring concert involves systematic identification and analysis of potential risks using techniques like Fault Tree Analysis and Expert Judgment. Recognizing these risks enables the committee to develop mitigation strategies, ensuring the safety, success, and enjoyment of the event while safeguarding the university’s reputation and resources.

References

• Aven, T. (2015). Risk Analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
• Hillson, D. (2009). Managing Risk in Projects. Routledge.
• Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Wiley.
• PMI. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide). Project Management Institute.
• Vose, D. (2008). Risk Analysis: A Quantitative Guide. John Wiley & Sons.
• Harwick, C. (2013). The Role of Expert Judgment in Risk Management. Journal of Risk Research, 16(3), 321-340.
• Fraser, J. (2010). Fault Tree Analysis. Safety Science, 148, 1-9.
• Osipov, V., & Tikhonov, A. (2014). Application of Delphi Technique in Risk Assessment. International Journal of Risk Assessment, 14(2), 122-130.
• ISO 31000:2018. Risk Management — Guidelines. International Organization for Standardization.
• Smith, P. G., & Merritt, G. M. (2002). Proactive Risk Management: Controlling Uncertainty in Product Development. Productivity Press.