In Class We Learned That The Literature Review Includes Intr

In Class We Learned That The Literature Review Includesintroduction

In class, we learned that the Literature Review includes: Introduction (6 sentences taught in this week's lesson) Review of Literature Analysis of Literature (use your EXCEL worksheet to compare and contrast what is the same and what is different among: WHY, HOW, and WHAT) For this submission: You will submit your completed Literature Review (all three sections) in a PDF document. YOU MUST CHECK YOUR SIMILARITY prior to submission.

Paper For Above instruction

The literature review is a fundamental component of academic research that provides an overview and critical analysis of existing scholarly works related to a specific research topic. It serves to contextualize the research problem, identify gaps in the current knowledge, and establish the theoretical or conceptual framework for the new study. The review typically begins with an introduction that briefly presents the scope and purpose of the literature review, followed by a detailed examination of relevant studies, theories, and findings. In this section, it is essential to organize the literature logically, highlighting similarities and differences among various sources to illustrate the current state of knowledge. The analysis stage involves synthesizing the literature to identify patterns, conflicts, and gaps, which can inform the research questions or hypotheses. Effective literature reviews also critically evaluate sources for credibility, relevance, and contribution, ultimately guiding the researcher in positioning their own work within the existing scholarly conversation.

The introduction of a literature review generally consists of about six sentences that define the scope of the review, introduce the main themes or topics covered, and articulate the significance of reviewing existing literature. It sets the context for the subsequent discussion and analysis, fostering clarity and focus for the reader. The review of literature itself involves summarizing key studies, theories, and concepts, often categorized into thematic or chronological sections. Within this section, it is useful to compare and contrast sources based on their research questions, methodologies, findings, and theoretical underpinnings—an exercise that can be facilitated by tools like Excel to organize and synthesize information systematically.

The analysis of literature—particularly to compare and contrast the why, how, and what of various sources—provides deeper insight into the research landscape. The ‘why’ refers to the purpose or rationale behind studies, the ‘how’ examines research methods and approaches, and the ‘what’ describes the findings or contributions. Using an Excel worksheet to organize these aspects helps identify where sources agree, differ, or fill knowledge gaps. This systematic comparison clarifies the strengths and limitations of existing research and underscores areas requiring further investigation. Ultimately, a comprehensive literature review not only demonstrates familiarity with the scholarly landscape but also highlights how the new research adds value by addressing specific gaps or advancing understanding in the field.

This process of constructing a literature review emphasizes critical thinking and synthesis, rather than mere description. A well-structured review should seamlessly integrate summaries and critiques, allowing the reader to grasp the evolution of ideas, debates, and discoveries pertinent to the research topic. The conclusion of the review synthesizes key insights, underscores the importance of the literature in framing the research problem, and introduces the purpose and scope of the current study. Ensuring all sections—introduction, review of literature, and analysis—are well-crafted and cohesive enhances the clarity and impact of the overall research presentation. Furthermore, prior to submitting the literature review, it is imperative to check for similarity to ensure originality and proper citation of sources.

References:

- Hart, C. (1998). Doing a Literature Review. SAGE Publications.

- Galvan, J. L. (2017). Writing Literature Reviews: A Guide for Students of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Routledge.

- Ridley, D. (2012). The Literature Review: A Step-by-Step Guide for Students. Sage Publications.

- Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C. (2017). They Say / I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing. W. W. Norton & Company.

- Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii–xxiii.

- Cooper, H. (2016). Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach. Sage Publications.

- Boote, D. N., & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars Before Researchers: Development of a Theoretical Framework for Literature Reviews. Educational Researcher, 34(6), 3-15.

- Kim, M. (2015). Systematic Literature Review Methodology. Journal of Educational Research, 108(3), 247-261.

- Jesson, J., Matheson, L., & Lacey, F. M. (2011). Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques. SAGE Publications.

- Fink, A. (2014). Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper. SAGE Publications.