In Continuation With The Data Of Employee Performance Scores

In Continuation With The Data Of Performance Scores Of Employees In P

In continuation with the data of performance scores of employees in the previous example, perform the following: a. Calculate the range and interquartile range. b. Calculate the z-scores. c. Calculate the skewness and kurtosis (using Excel). d. Comment. In continuation with the data of performance scores of employees in the previous example, perform the following: a. Make the histogram b. Plot the box-plot diagram c. Plot the frequency polygon d. Plot the Ogive diagram.

Paper For Above instruction

Analyzing employee performance scores provides valuable insights into the distribution, variability, and overall performance trends within an organization. This paper focuses on applying descriptive statistics and graphical representations to a given dataset of employee performance scores. The goal is to understand the central tendency, spread, and shape of the data, as well as visually interpret the distribution to support organizational decision-making.

Data Overview

The dataset under examination comprises performance scores of employees from a previous example. Although specific raw data points are not included here, typical datasets in similar analyses involve numerical scores representing employee performance metrics.

Part A: Calculating Range and Interquartile Range

The range is a simple measure of variability, calculated as the difference between the maximum and minimum scores in the data set. The interquartile range (IQR) measures the middle 50% spread, calculated as the difference between the third quartile (Q3) and the first quartile (Q1).

Assuming a dataset, for example, scores: 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95.

- The range: 95 - 50 = 45.

- To find Q1 and Q3:

- Q1 (25th percentile): around 60

- Q3 (75th percentile): around 85

- The IQR: 85 - 60 = 25.

These calculations reveal the spread of scores, highlighting the variability within the employee performance scores.

Part B: Calculating Z-Scores

Z-scores standardize individual data points relative to the mean, indicating how many standard deviations a score is from the average.

For the example dataset:

- Mean (μ): (50+55+60+65+70+75+80+85+90+95) / 10 = 72.5.

- Standard deviation (σ): Calculated using the formula for sample or population, typical here would be approximately 15.14.

For each score:

- Z for 50: (50 - 72.5) / 15.14 ≈ -1.5

- Z for 95: (95 - 72.5) / 15.14 ≈ 1.5

Such standardized scores identify how each employee's performance compares to the average, which is useful for identifying outliers or high performers.

Part C: Calculating Skewness and Kurtosis

Using Excel functions, skewness measures the asymmetry of the distribution around its mean, while kurtosis indicates the peakedness or flatness relative to a normal distribution. For a symmetric, bell-shaped distribution, skewness is near zero, and kurtosis resembles that of a normal distribution.

Assuming the use of Excel:

- Skewness might be close to 0 indicating symmetric data.

- Kurtosis near 3 signifies a mesokurtic distribution, similar to a normal curve.

If skewness is positive, the data tail extends towards higher scores; if negative, it extends toward lower scores. Kurtosis informs whether the distribution is more peaked or flatter than normal, influencing how performance variability is interpreted.

Part D: Comments

The calculated metrics suggest the distribution's nature and variability. A moderate range and IQR suggest some spread in employee performance. Z-scores help identify high- or low-performing employees relative to the mean. Skewness and kurtosis values inform about the symmetry and tail behavior, which impact how performance improvement initiatives may be targeted. For example, positive skewness might indicate a majority of employees perform below the high performers, while kurtosis signals whether outliers significantly influence the dataset.

Part E: Graphical Representations

Visual tools are critical for understanding data distribution:

- Histogram: illustrates the frequency of performance scores within intervals, revealing the shape and spread.

- Box-Plot: displays median, quartiles, and potential outliers, summarizing data distribution efficiently.

- Frequency Polygon: connects the midpoints of histogram bars, highlighting distribution shape and modality.

- Ogive: plots cumulative frequency, showing the percentile ranks and cumulative distribution.

Using software like Excel, these graphical representations can be generated by importing the data and utilizing built-in chart functions.

Conclusion

Analyzing employee performance scores through statistical measures and visual tools allows organizations to identify performance trends and outliers effectively. Measures like range, IQR, z-scores, skewness, and kurtosis provide quantitative insights, while plots such as histograms, box plots, and ogives enhance interpretability. These insights assist in tailoring human resource strategies, ensuring targeted performance management and development initiatives.

References

1. Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2017). Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Cengage Learning.

2. Bowerman, B. L., O'Connell, R. T., & Koehler, K. J. (2014). Business Statistics in Practice. McGraw-Hill Education.

3. Ott, R. L., & Longnecker, M. (2015). An Introduction to Statistical Thinking. Duxbury Press.

4. Montgomery, D. C., & Runger, G. C. (2014). Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers. Wiley.

5. Zar, J. H. (2010). Biostatistical Analysis. Pearson.

6. Excel Functions documentation: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/excel

7. Everitt, B. (2012). The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics. Cambridge University Press.

8. Freund, J. E., & Williams, D. (2010). Modern Elementary Statistics. Pearson.

9. Wilcox, R. R. (2012). Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing. Academic Press.

10. McClave, J. T., & Sincich, T. (2017). Statistics. Pearson.