In-Depth Activity: The Aim Of This In-Depth Activity Is For

In Depth Activitythe Aim Of This In Depth Activity Is For You To Think

The aim of this in-depth activity is for you to think about the appropriateness of different kinds of conceptual models that have been designed for similar physical and digital information artifacts. Compare the following: A paperback book and an ebook; A paper-based map and a smartphone map app.

1. What are the main concepts and metaphors that have been used for each? (Think about the way time is conceptualized for each.)

2. How do they differ?

3. What aspects of the paper-based artifact have informed the digital app?

4. What is the new functionality?

5. Are any aspects of the conceptual model confusing? What are the pros and cons?

Paper For Above instruction

The task requires a detailed comparison of physical and digital representations of information artifacts, focusing on conceptual models and metaphors. It invites analysis of how traditional materials, such as textbooks and paper maps, have informed digital counterparts, and how these digital versions introduce new functionalities and conceptual challenges.

Beginning with books, physical books and ebooks serve similar informational purposes but differ significantly in their underlying conceptual models. Physical books rely on tangible metaphors—pages, spines, covers—that create a straightforward, tactile experience. Time is often conceptualized linearly, as one physically turns pages, with progress marked by pages read. Conversely, ebooks utilize digital metaphors like scrolling, bookmarking, and search functions, which abstract the linearity of reading and allow non-linear navigation. The digital metaphor often models reading as navigation through a network of connected digital content rather than a physical sequence.

The main concepts for physical books include permanence, tangibility, and a physical boundary—books occupy physical space and can be touched and felt. Their conceptual metaphors borrow from the physical object: pages are leaves, covers are shells. Ebooks, on the other hand, emphasize immateriality and flexibility. They use metaphors related to digital files and computer interfaces, such as icons and hyperlinks, which enable quick access and multi-device synchronization.

The differences between them are grounded largely in the tangibility and interaction style. Physical books are static, limited by physical characteristics, while ebooks can be easily updated, searched, and customized. The shift from linear page-turning to digital navigation alters the user’s interaction and conceptualization of the reading experience—less about physical proximity and more about digital connectivity.

Regarding maps, paper-based maps depend on spatial and geographic metaphors; they represent physical space and use symbols, legends, and scales to help users conceptualize their environment. Time is implicitly conceptualized through representations of routes and distances. Digital maps utilize interactive, dynamic metaphors—zooming, panning, and layering—that enhance the spatial metaphor with real-time data, GPS tracking, and contextual overlays.

The paper map’s conceptual model emphasizes static representations, relying on the user’s interpretation to navigate space. In contrast, smartphone map apps build on this by integrating real-time data, user location, and additional information layers, providing a more dynamic and fluid conceptualization of geography. These digital maps extend the physical map’s static image with functionalities like navigation prompts and search capabilities.

Aspects of paper maps have informed the digital map app through the fundamental spatial and geographic metaphors, but digital maps introduce innovations such as real-time updates, route recalculations, and layered information. The app’s functionality now includes live traffic updates, augmented reality features, and integration with other digital services, representing a significant extension of the original physical metaphor.

However, some aspects of the conceptual model can be confusing. For instance, a user unfamiliar with digital maps may not understand the overlay of layers or the difference between static and dynamic representations. The pros of physical maps include their reliability and simplicity—they do not depend on batteries or connectivity. Conversely, their static nature means they cannot provide real-time information or adapt to user needs instantaneously. Digital maps offer flexibility, real-time data, and additional layers of information, but they require technology access and can be overwhelming or confusing to some users.

Overall, the transition from physical to digital artifacts involves adapting core metaphors to new functionalities while maintaining user familiarity. These conceptual models must balance simplicity with capability, ensuring clarity without sacrificing the richness of information or interaction.

References

• Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. MIT Press.
• Harper, R. (2010). Inside the interface: Understanding the human–computer interaction. MIT Press.
• Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. (2006). Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design. MIT Press.
• Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability engineering. Morgan Kaufmann.
• Preece, J., Rogers, Y., & Sharp, H. (2015). Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. Wiley.
• Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., & Preece, J. (2011). Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. Wiley.
• Shneiderman, B., & Plaisant, C. (2010). Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. Pearson.
• Thudt, A., Carpendale, S., & Greenberg, S. (2012). The cartography of social roles and relationships in tabletop groupware. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction.
• Weiser, M. (1991). The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American, 265(3), 94-104.
• Wilkinson, S. (2011). Digital spatial tools: conceptual models for cartography and geographic information science. Cartography and Geographic Information Science.