In Her Commentary: The Global Dimensions Of Public Health

In Her Commentary The Global Dimensions Of Public Health Preparednes

In her commentary, “The Global Dimensions of Public Health Preparedness and Implications for US Action,” Moore (2012) points out that Public Health is truly a global issue; and she discusses what that means for us here in the US in terms of our need for preparedness. She suggests four areas for action: 1) sensitize practitioners to the global nature of diseases, 2) learn from the success of other countries, 3) US Investment in Global Health, and 4) acting locally on global issues. Instructions Your assignment is to write an essay in which you select the single area that you feel to be the most important for public health preparedness. Justify your position. You can submit your paper in a Question and Answer format.

In other words, list the questions and provide a short answer to each. AMA format What is the Area for Action that you feel is most important for public health preparedness? (Please write 1 paragraph maximum here) Hint: you will need to conduct your own scholarly research for information on the topic. For example, enter The Online Library and enter search terms, such as “Public Health Preparedness.” Be sure to check the box to limit your search to full-text access. Why might each of the other dimensions be slightly less important? Be sure to cite sources rather than simply stating your opinion.

Paper For Above instruction

Public health preparedness plays a crucial role in ensuring that communities and nations are resilient against potential health threats, such as infectious diseases, environmental hazards, and bioterrorism. Among the four suggested areas for action by Moore (2012), I believe that investing in global health by the United States is the most critical for enhancing overall public health preparedness. This approach recognizes that health threats do not respect borders, and strengthening global health systems directly benefits domestic safety and health security. Adequate investment enables the development of robust disease surveillance, rapid response systems, and capacity-building initiatives worldwide, which in turn decrease the risk of outbreaks reaching U.S. shores. As examples, the Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA) emphasizes international collaboration to prevent, detect, and respond to infectious disease threats (U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, 2017). When the US invests in global health, it actively participates in strengthening health infrastructure in low-resource settings, which reduces the likelihood of disease emergence and transmission globally. Such investments also foster diplomatic relations and global stability, indirectly contributing to national security. Therefore, US investment in global health not only addresses health inequities worldwide but also serves as a proactive measure to protect Americans from emerging health threats. Research indicates that international funding and cooperation are essential for effective disease control (Katz et al., 2011), making this area of action essential for comprehensive preparedness.

While the other dimensions—sensitizing practitioners to the global nature of disease, learning from other countries, and acting locally on global issues—are undeniably important, they may be slightly less impactful if not supported by substantial financial commitments. For example, simply increasing awareness without tangible funding limits the implementation of necessary programs and infrastructure. Learning from other countries provides valuable insights but depends on the capacity to adapt successful strategies, which again requires investment. Acting locally is crucial; however, without engaging in global health investments, local actions may be less effective in addressing the root causes of emerging threats. In contrast, proactive US global health investments have the potential to prevent threats before they reach U.S. borders, making this approach most aligned with the goal of comprehensive public health preparedness (Moon et al., 2015). In conclusion, investing in global health is the most effective means of safeguarding public health, as it encompasses prevention, capacity-building, and international cooperation essential for global security.

References

• Katz, R., Nielsen, K., & Lee, C. (2011). Global health security: Building capacity for health emergencies. Journal of Public Health Policy, 32(4), 457-467.
• Moon, S., Sridhar, D., Pate, M. A., et al. (2015). Will EbolaChange the game? Ten essential reforms before the next pandemic. The Lancet, 386(10009), 2204-2221.
• U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2017). Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA). Retrieved from https://www.hhs.gov/about/agencies/asec/health-security/about-ghsa/index.html