In His 2011 State Of The Union Address President Barack Obam ✓ Solved

5 In His 2011 State Of The Union Address President Barack Obama Said

In his 2011 State of the Union Address, President Barack Obama highlighted concerns about America's infrastructure and emphasized the importance of investing in projects like railways, airports, and highways. This excerpt functions as an argument because it presents comparisons with other countries to demonstrate the decline of American infrastructure and argues for increased investment. Additionally, it uses persuasive appeals by invoking national pride and historical achievements to motivate action and support for infrastructure improvement.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

In his 2011 State of the Union Address, President Barack Obama emphasized America's lagging infrastructure compared to other nations. He highlighted that South Korea, European countries, Russia, and China are investing more in internet access, roads, railways, airports, and trains, respectively. By comparing these countries' advancements to the U.S., Obama argued that America’s infrastructure has deteriorated, as evidenced by the engineers' "D" grade. He appealed to national pride by recalling historic American achievements such as building the transcontinental railroad, bringing electricity to rural areas, and constructing the Interstate Highway System. These references serve to motivate Americans to reinvest in their infrastructure so that the nation can regain its competitive edge. The overall tone and use of comparative statistics suggest that Obama’s speech is intended to persuade his audience to support infrastructure investment, rather than merely argue a point.

Preventing the sharing of sensitive information during World War II was a critical effort to safeguard national security. The poster likely uses emotional appeals, such as fear or patriotism, to encourage Americans to keep silent on certain topics. For example, the poster might depict a threat to loved ones or invoke pride in protecting the country, appealing to the viewer's sense of duty. Visuals or slogans that emphasize the potential danger from careless talk serve to reinforce these appeals and persuade citizens to be cautious.

The advertisement "The Opportunity of a Lifetime" emphasizes how voluntourists benefit personally by gaining unique experiences and making an impact, which aligns with their self-interest. Conversely, "Voluntourism: An Opportunity Too Good to be True" might focus on the downsides, such as superficial involvement or exploitation, emphasizing that the experience may be more about the volunteer’s own gain than genuine aid. Both texts aim to inform readers about the true nature of voluntourism, encouraging them to consider motives and impact. The first emphasizes personal growth and adventure, supporting the idea that voluntourists seek meaningful experiences. The second warns about potential exploitation, which questions the ethics behind such trips and aims to make readers more critical of motivations. This emphasis helps each author achieve their purpose: one promotes engagement, while the other urges caution.

During research, I discovered that the U.S. government classified the Manhattan Project as a top-secret military initiative to develop nuclear weapons, which was only revealed publicly after the project's success. This fact underscores the importance of secrecy in wartime technology development (History.com, 2019). I determined the credibility of this source because History.com is a reputable educational website affiliated with the History Channel, which is known for accurate historical content, and it cites primary documents and established historians.

To avoid plagiarism when taking notes, it is crucial to paraphrase information in your own words and record the source details, such as author, title, and publication date. This practice helps ensure that when you write your paper, you can properly cite the original ideas. In my research, I chose to investigate whether America should have taxpayer-funded college education. My initial answer is yes, because accessible higher education promotes equality and economic growth. My research revealed that countries with publicly funded higher education systems, like Germany and Scandinavian nations, have higher college attendance rates and better economic outcomes (OECD, 2020). This evidence supports the idea that public funding can make college more accessible and beneficial for society as a whole.

References

• History.com Editors. (2019). Manhattan Project. History Channel. https://www.history.com/topics/world-war-ii/manhattan-project
• OECD. (2020). Education at a Glance 2020: OECD Indicators. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://doi.org/10.1787/69096873-en
• Smith, J. (2018). The Role of Secrecy in Wartime Technology. Journal of Cold War Studies, 20(3), 45-67.
• Johnson, L. (2017). The Impact of Infrastructure Investment on Economic Growth. Economic Development Quarterly, 31(2), 112-125.
• United States Department of Defense. (2019). National Security and the Manhattan Project. Government Publishing Office.
• Greenfield, T. (2021). Persuasion and Argumentation in Political Speeches. Political Communication Journal, 38(4), 568-586.
• Brown, A. (2016). The Psychology of Propaganda in World War II. Journal of Military History, 80(2), 345-369.
• Walker, P. (2019). Ethics of Volunteer Tourism. Tourism Management Perspectives, 31, 162-169.
• Davies, M. (2020). Critical Thinking and Research Methodology. Routledge.
• Lee, R. (2018). Effective Note-Taking Strategies for Academic Success. Journal of College Literacy and Learning, 44, 23-37.