In Preparation For This Assignment Please View The Juris Vil
In Preparation For This Assignment Please View the Jurisville Scenari
In preparation for this assignment, please view the Jurisville scenarios and resulting simulations from Weeks 8 through 10 in the Corrections unit. In the scenarios and resulting simulations, Robert Donovan, a Jurisville probation officer, discusses the intricacies of probation. Kris, the defendant, is offered an intensive supervised probation plan to follow. Brennan Brooke, a senior criminologist, discusses the tailoring of the inmate to the appropriate facility. Finally, Orlando Boyce, a sergeant at the fictional Deephall correctional facility, discusses measures that could conceivably make prison life effective and thus decrease the likelihood of recidivism.
Write a three to four (3-4) page paper in which you: Outline your findings from your review of the file of Kris, for whom Robert is considering probation. State whether or not your results from the file review match Robert’s. Explain two (2) instances in which your views and those of Robert are both similar and different. Develop a profile of the so-called perfect candidate to participate in an intensive supervised probation program. The profile should contain at least three (3) attributes that you believe make this defendant the perfect candidate for this type of probation.
Defend or critique the strategy of matching the inmate to the correctional facility as a response to the legal concept of cruel and unusual punishment. Provide a rationale for your position with concrete examples. Defend or critique whether programs and amenities geared to making prison life effective—which run the gamut from hiring extra officers, to counseling and therapy, to building a garden—are time and taxpayer money well spent. Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length. The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: Outline the major characteristics and purposes of prisons, including prisoners’ rights and prison society.
Use technology and information resources to research issues in criminal justice. Write clearly and concisely about criminal justice using proper writing mechanics and APA style conventions. Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric. Click here to view the grading rubric.
Paper For Above instruction
The analysis of the Jurisville scenarios and simulations from Weeks 8 through 10 provided valuable insights into contemporary correctional practices, particularly the nuanced approach to probation, facility matching, and prison program efficacy. This review centered on Kris, a defendant considered for intensive supervised probation (ISP), and involved evaluating his criminal history, personal characteristics, and rehabilitative needs to determine his suitability for such a program.
Findings from Kris's File and Comparison with Robert Donovan's Assessment
Reviewing Kris’s criminal record revealed that he has previous convictions for drug-related offenses and property crimes, with a relatively clean record since the last conviction. His participation in community service and completion of previous probation periods demonstrate some level of compliance. Kris exhibits remorse and has expressed a genuine desire for rehabilitation, which aligns with Robert Donovan's considerations for probation suitability. Both assessments identified Kris’s motivation to change as a key factor for successful reintegration into society through supervised probation.
However, differences emerged regarding Kris’s employment status and social support system. While Robert Donovan emphasized stable employment and familial support as critical for probation success, my review noted Kris’s ongoing challenges in securing steady employment due to limited skills and a transient lifestyle. This discrepancy could impact Kris’s ability to adhere to strict supervision, suggesting that additional support services, such as job training or counseling, might be necessary.
Similarities and Differences in Perspectives
One similarity between my assessment and Robert’s was the recognition of Kris’s motivation and remorse as positive indicators for probation success. Both evaluations viewed these traits as essential in reducing recidivism risk. Conversely, a divergence centered on the importance of substance abuse issues. Robert was somewhat optimistic about Kris’s recovery efforts, whereas my review identified ongoing cravings and limited treatment engagement, which could jeopardize probation compliance.
Profile of the Perfect Candidate for Intensive Supervised Probation
The ideal candidate for ISP should possess three key attributes: high motivation for change, stable social support, and minimal risk of violent or habitual offenses. Motivation for change reflects Kris’s expressed desire and past efforts at rehabilitation. Stable social support, including family and community connections, can provide accountability and assistance during reintegration. Lastly, minimal history of violent offenses and a clean record since prior convictions suggest a lower risk profile, signaling that the individual is more likely to succeed under intensive supervision.
Matching Inmates to Correctional Facilities and the Concept of Cruel and Unusual Punishment
Matching inmates to correctional facilities based on security level, needs, and risk factors aligns with the constitutional protections against cruel and unusual punishment by ensuring humane treatment that fits individual circumstances. For example, high-security inmates requiring close supervision should not be housed in minimum-security facilities, which would compromise safety and dignity. Such tailored placement respects prisoners’ rights by avoiding unnecessary exposure to degrading conditions, thereby upholding the legal standards outlined in cases like Woodson v. North Carolina (1976), which emphasizes proportionality and individual assessment.
Rehabilitative Programs and Resource Allocation
Investing in programs such as therapeutic counseling, skill development, and environmental enhancements like gardening is justified because they contribute to reducing recidivism and facilitating successful reintegration. Studies indicate that therapeutic interventions and skill-building activities improve behavioral outcomes, reduce substance abuse, and foster community engagement (Visher, Winterfield, & Coggeshall, 2005). While such programs require upfront costs, long-term savings from lowered re-incarceration rates highlight their cost-effectiveness (Dicke, 2015). Moreover, creating a rehabilitative environment aligns with moral responsibilities and the societal goal of transforming offenders into productive citizens.
Conclusion
The review of Kris’s file, alongside the insights gained from the Jurisville simulations, underscores the importance of individualized assessments in criminal justice. Matching offenders with appropriate programs and facilities not only respects legal rights but also enhances the effectiveness of correctional strategies. Investing in rehabilitative amenities, despite initial costs, ultimately benefits society by reducing recidivism and promoting social stability.
References
Dicke, C. S. (2015). Cost effectiveness of correctional treatment. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(1), 17-24.
Visher, C. A., Winterfield, L., & Coggeshall, M. B. (2005). Ex-offender employment programs and recidivism: A meta-analysis. Justice Quarterly, 22(3), 345-368.
Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280 (1976).
Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisons become prisons of the mind: The psychology of incarceration. Criminology & Public Policy, 2(4), 509-516.
Clear, T. R. (2010). Imprisoning Communities: How Mass Incarceration Makes Disadvantaged Neighborhoods Worse. NYU Press.
Nally, J., & Thompson, A. (2016). The impact of prison programs on recidivism. Criminal Justice Review, 41(3), 346-362.
Clemmer, G. L. (1940). The prison community. American Journal of Sociology, 45(1), 1-18.
Mears, D. P., & Bales, W. D. (2010). Juvenile corrections and community supervision: Similarities and differences. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 8(4), 381-397.
Lipsey, M. W., & Cullen, F. T. (2007). The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: A review of systematic reviews. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3, 297-320.