In The 1950s, A Radical Shift In Counseling Occurred

In The 1950s A Radical Shift In Counseling Occurred Numerous Key Fig

In the 1950s, a radical shift in counseling occurred. Numerous key figures in the fields of family counseling and therapy proposed the view that pervasive mental health problems were not individual problems, as was previously thought, but originated with and were perpetuated by family dynamics. The shift from working with individuals with pervasive or severe mental illness or health concerns via individual psychotherapy to working with the identified “patient” and their families in the 1950s provided the context for the birth and growth of family counseling/therapy. Since that time, mental health professionals working with families with a member experiencing pervasive mental illness or health concerns have moved away from the controversial stance above, to acknowledge that both genes and biology influence behavior and that relationships can maintain or exacerbate symptomology, as well as assist in alleviating it via various coping mechanisms.

Tertiary intervention is the formal term for working with clients experiencing pervasive mental illness or health concerns, but it may also be referred to as remedial or rehabilitative counseling. When you encounter a couple or family for which tertiary intervention may be appropriate, your assessment focus should shift. First, you should be aware of any symptoms or cues that may substantiate your concerns, and assess whether couple and family therapy is indeed the best form of service to provide. It may be that one or more persons would benefit from individual services, whether simultaneously with or before any couple or family counseling. For this Discussion, you will examine couple/family sessions requiring assessment and intervention, as well as exploring the challenges couple/family sessions might include.

Paper For Above instruction

In contemporary family therapy practice, understanding the necessity for thorough assessment and intervention beyond the initial couple or family session is crucial, especially when dealing with pervasive mental health issues. Certain symptoms and cues observed during sessions can signal underlying issues that require additional assessment and tailored treatment plans. Recognizing these indicators early can significantly influence the outcome and effectiveness of the intervention. This essay will identify three such symptoms or cues, analyze why they necessitate further assessment beyond standard couple or family therapy, discuss the subsequent steps a helping professional should take, and examine the challenges associated with continued work with the family once an individual requires concurrent treatment.

Symptoms or Cues Requiring Additional Assessment and Intervention

Firstly, one critical cue that may signal the need for further assessment is the presence of persistent depressive symptoms within a family member, such as withdrawal from social activities, pervasive sadness, or noticeable changes in sleep or appetite patterns. These symptoms suggest more than relational discord and could indicate underlying mood disorders such as major depression or bipolar disorder. When such symptoms are observed during sessions, they warrant a comprehensive psychological evaluation to determine the severity and underlying causes, especially if they impede the family dynamics or contribute to dysfunctional interactions.

Secondly, recurring expressions of hopelessness or expressed thoughts of suicide by one family member also serve as vital cues. Such disclosures indicate a risk of severe mental health crises, requiring immediate assessment by qualified mental health professionals. These cues surpass the scope of typical couple or family therapy and point toward the necessity of crisis intervention strategies, possible hospitalization, and a multidimensional treatment approach that includes mental health medication management and individual therapy for safety and stabilization.

Thirdly, noticeable cognitive impairments or disorientation during family sessions—such as difficulty concentrating, memory lapses, or confusion—are symptoms associated with neurological conditions or substance abuse issues that extend beyond relational issues. These signs demand a multidisciplinary assessment to identify underlying medical or substance use disorders that may be contributing to or exacerbating the family’s distress. Addressing these conditions often involves coordinating care with healthcare providers to develop an appropriate treatment plan.

Next Steps for Helping Professionals

Following the identification of such symptoms, the next step for the helping professional involves establishing a collaborative referral process. This includes communicating with the individual about observed symptoms in a sensitive, non-judgmental manner, and encouraging them to seek comprehensive assessment from relevant healthcare providers. The professional should provide information about mental health resources, suggest appropriate evaluations, and support the individual in navigating these services. Additionally, it’s important to maintain the family’s trust and ensure that the assessment process is integrated seamlessly into ongoing therapeutic work, emphasizing that the goal is to support the overall well-being of all family members.

Moreover, the clinician must consider their role in ongoing treatment planning. If the individual’s assessment indicates they require specialized intervention, the therapist should coordinate with the individual’s healthcare team and, when appropriate, include the family in psychoeducation and support strategies. This integrated approach promotes continuity of care, helps address complex issues holistically, and enhances the potential for positive outcomes.

Challenges of Working with Families When Individual Treatment Is Needed

One significant challenge in continuing work with a family when an individual requires concurrent treatment is managing confidentiality and boundaries. The clinician must respect the individual’s privacy while ensuring that the family understands and supports the treatment process. Balancing the needs of the individual and the family can be complex, especially if there are differing perceptions about the individual’s condition or treatment necessity.

Furthermore, differing levels of insight and motivation for treatment among family members can complicate the therapeutic process. Resistance from family members to acknowledge or accept the individual’s mental health needs can hinder progress and create conflicts within family dynamics. The therapist must navigate these dynamics tactfully while promoting empathy, understanding, and cooperation among family members.

Another challenge involves maintaining therapeutic momentum. When the focus shifts to multiple treatment streams—individual and family therapy—there is a risk of fragmented care and decreased engagement. Ensuring effective communication and coordination among different providers is vital to provide cohesive support. Additionally, clinicians must remain attentive to potential burnout and emotional fatigue associated with managing complex cases.

Despite these challenges, ongoing collaborative approaches can facilitate more comprehensive treatment and foster resilience within families. Establishing clear goals, roles, and communication pathways between professionals and family members is essential for effective intervention. Training and supervision are also valuable resources for clinicians dealing with such multifaceted cases, enhancing their skills in managing concurrent treatments and family dynamics.

Conclusion

Recognizing symptoms that require additional assessment beyond standard couple or family therapy is essential for comprehensive mental health care. Symptoms such as persistent mood disturbances, suicidal ideation, and cognitive impairments are indicators of underlying issues that necessitate specialized treatment. As helping professionals, taking appropriate next steps involves timely referrals, information sharing, and coordinated care to ensure effective intervention. Challenges in working with families when individual treatment is necessary include navigating confidentiality, managing differing perceptions, and maintaining therapeutic continuity. Overcoming these obstacles through effective communication, collaboration, and ongoing professional development can significantly improve outcomes for families dealing with complex mental health needs.

References

• Alexander, F. (2016). Family therapy: Concepts and methods. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
• Bourgeois, H. (2018). Mental health assessment and treatment planning. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Carter, B., & McGoldrick, M. (2010). The expanded family life cycle: Individual, family, and social perspectives. Boston, MA: Pearson.
• Solomon, M. (2019). The integration of family therapy and mental health treatment. Journal of Family Therapy, 41(2), 182–195.
• Nichols, M. P. (2013). Family therapy: Concepts and methods. Boston, MA: Pearson.
• Johnson, S. (2019). Psychotherapeutic approaches for complex cases. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
• Goldenberg, H., & Goldenberg, I. (2012). Family Therapy: An overview. Brooks/Cole.
• Greeson, J. M., & Koenig, H. (2018). Integrating mental health and medical care. Medical Clinics of North America, 102(4), 647–659.
• Compton, W. C., & Shim, S. (2015). Social determining factors of mental health. Encyclopedia of Mental Health, 4, 44–51.
• Walsh, F. (2016). Strengthening family resilience. Guilford Publications.