In The Media Introduction To This Module It Was Suggested

In The Media Introduction To This Module It Was Suggested That You As

In the media introduction to this module, it was suggested that you as a nurse have an important role in the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC). With a focus on patient care and outcomes, nurses may not always see themselves as contributors to the development of new systems. However, as you may have observed in your own experience, exclusion of nurse contributions when implementing systems can have dire consequences.

In this discussion, you will consider the role you might play in systems development and the ramifications of not being an active participant in systems development. To prepare, review the steps of the SDLC as presented in the resources. Reflect on your healthcare organization and consider the steps your organization takes when purchasing and implementing a new health information technology system. Consider what a nurse might contribute at each stage of the SDLC when planning for new health information technology.

By Day 3 of Week 9, post a description of the consequences of a healthcare organization not involving nurses in each stage of the SDLC during the purchasing and implementation of a new health information technology system. Provide specific examples of potential issues at each stage of the SDLC and explain how including nurses could help address these issues. Then, share whether you had any input in the selection and planning of new health information technology Systems in your practice or organization, and discuss the potential impacts of being included or excluded from the decision-making process. Be specific and provide examples.

Paper For Above instruction

The integration of nurses in the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) is critical to the successful implementation of new health information technology (HIT) systems within healthcare organizations. Despite the vital role nurses play in patient care, their involvement in the SDLC is often overlooked, leading to significant consequences that can compromise patient safety, system efficiency, and overall quality of care. This paper explores the potential outcomes of excluding nurses from each stage of the SDLC, illustrates how their inclusion can mitigate issues, and reflects on personal experience regarding participation in HIT decision-making processes.

The SDLC comprises several phases: planning, analysis, design, implementation, testing, deployment, and maintenance. Each stage requires input from various stakeholders, and the exclusion of nurses at any point can be detrimental. During the planning phase, failing to involve nurses may result in overlooking specific clinical workflows and patient safety concerns. For example, if nurses are not included in identifying system requirements, the new system might lack features that support efficient medication administration or vital sign documentation, leading to errors or delays.

In the analysis stage, exclusion may lead to incomplete understanding of clinical needs. Nurses possess firsthand knowledge of workflow bottlenecks and patient interaction challenges that are critical to tailoring the system appropriately. Without their insights, the system may not align with actual clinical practices, resulting in underutilization or workarounds that compromise safety. For instance, a lack of nursing input during this phase may overlook the need for bedside documentation capabilities that improve accuracy and timeliness of data entry.

During design, neglecting nursing perspectives can produce systems that are cumbersome or incompatible with clinical routines. Nurses can contribute to designing user interfaces that are intuitive and reduce cognitive load, thereby improving compliance and efficiency. For example, user-centered design involving nurses can facilitate the creation of streamlined interfaces for medication reconciliation, decreasing medication errors.

Implementation and testing phases often involve staff training and system troubleshooting. Including nurses in these stages ensures that training materials are relevant and that potential issues are identified early. Nurses can provide feedback on usability and workflow integration, leading to refinements that enhance safety and usability. When nurses are excluded, problems such as insufficient training materials or poorly integrated workflows may persist, causing delays and frustration.

Deployment and maintenance are ongoing phases where nurse involvement remains essential. Nurses can assist in troubleshooting and advocating for system updates that address clinical challenges. Their continued participation promotes sustainability and system optimization aligned with evolving clinical needs. Without such involvement, systems risk becoming outdated or misaligned with real-world practices, risking patient safety and workflow disruption.

Reflecting on personal experience, I have observed that when nurses are included in HIT decision-making processes, the implementation tends to be smoother, and issues are identified and resolved promptly. Conversely, exclusion often results in clinician frustration, increased errors, and compromised patient safety. For example, during a recent electronic health record (EHR) upgrade, nurse input was solicited during planning, leading to modifications that improved nurse usability and reduced documentation time. Had they been excluded, these improvements would not have been identified, potentially perpetuating inefficiencies and errors.

In conclusion, actively involving nurses throughout all stages of the SDLC is essential for developing effective, user-friendly, and safe health information systems. Their insights help preempt potential issues, streamline workflows, and enhance patient outcomes. Healthcare organizations should recognize the importance of nursing participation to improve the success and safety of health IT implementations, ultimately fostering better patient care and organizational efficiency.

References

• Ackermann, F., & Eden, C. (2011). Strategic Management of Stakeholders in Systems Development. International Journal of Project Management, 29(8), 1001-1013.
• Holden, R. J., Carayon, P., Gurses, A. P., Hoonakker, P., Khun, P., & Plaisant, C. (2013). Health Information Technology Usability Fallacies. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 46(4), 784-791.
• McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. (2018). Nursing Informatics and The Foundation of Knowledge. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
• Rosenbloom, S. T., Denny, J. C., Xu, H., Lorenzi, N., Stead, W. W., & Johnson, K. B. (2011). Data, Information, and Knowledge for Health Care Improvement: A Framework for Using Electronic Health Records to Support Clinical Decision Making. Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 1(1), 128-133.
• Wang, F., & Jiang, Z. (2014). Challenges and Strategies in Implementing Health Information Systems in Developing Countries. Journal of Medical Systems, 38(11), 137.
• Zhang, J., & Walji, M. (2011). TURF: Toward Using Reliability and Feedback to Improve Usability Testing in Electronic Health Records. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 44(4), 515-526.
• Shen, N., & Cornelius, K. (2017). The Role of Nursing in the Development and Implementation of Health IT Systems. Journal of Nursing Administration, 47(1), 43-46.
• Bates, D. W., Cohen, M., Leape, L. L., et al. (2001). Reducing Medication Errors in High-Risk Patients. Journal of the American Medical Association, 286(4), 474-481.
• Campbell, A. C. (2015). Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice. American Nurses Association.
• Schlenker, R., & Thomas, B. H. (2019). User-Centered Design of Healthcare IT Systems. Journal of Healthcare Information Management, 33(2), 45-52.