In The Negotiation Sense, Power Can Be Viewed As Capacity

In The Negotiation Sense Power Can Be Viewed As The Capacity To Achie

In the negotiation sense, power can be viewed as the capacity to achieve an ideal outcome. While many people associate power with control over others—being able to influence or compel actions—this perspective emphasizes the strategic use of power to attain desired results. The capacity to sway others to align with one’s interests is a critical aspect of negotiation, but it must be wielded thoughtfully. An overemphasis on exerting power for its own sake, especially through distributive bargaining tactics, can damage relationships and lead to suboptimal outcomes. Conversely, understanding different types of power allows negotiators to leverage their strengths without harming long-term connections, especially when the substantive issue outweighs the importance of maintaining rapport.

Within the realm of negotiation, various forms of power can be identified, each with its unique application and influence. These include position-based power, relationship-based power, informational power, and contextual power. Recognizing and appropriately deploying these types of power can greatly enhance negotiation effectiveness.

Position-Based Power

Position-based power derives from an individual's formal role or authority within an organization or society. It grants the holder the legitimacy to make decisions and influence outcomes due to their designated position. An illustrative example is Narendra Modi, the Prime Minister of India. Since assuming office in 2014 and securing subsequent electoral victories, Modi’s role as Prime Minister has bestowed upon him significant position-based power. He has used this authority to strengthen India's standing both domestically and internationally, traversing global platforms to reinforce his influence. His ability to leverage his political role exemplifies how formal authority can translate into substantial negotiation power, provided it is used judiciously. Position power often confers a sense of legitimacy, which can be persuasive and authoritative in negotiations, especially when backed by public support or institutional authority.

Relationship-Based Power

Relationship-based power emanates from personal relationships, networks, and social bonds. It is rooted in trust, respect, and mutual influence. Mahendra Singh Dhoni, former captain of the Indian cricket team, exemplifies this type of power. Known for his leadership qualities and his ability to prioritize team welfare, Dhoni’s influence extended beyond his technical skills to his capacity to inspire and motivate his team. His leadership underpins the trust and loyalty he cultivated, which proved crucial during high-stakes competitions such as the 2011 Cricket World Cup victory. This form of power highlights the importance of interpersonal skills and rapport in negotiations. Strong relationships can open doors, facilitate cooperation, and enable negotiators to influence outcomes more effectively.

Informational Power

Informational power stems from possessing valuable knowledge or expertise that others do not have. Elon Musk serves as a notable example of this type of power. As an innovator and entrepreneur, Musk has accumulated extensive knowledge about technology, space exploration, and renewable energy. His insights into these fields have given him a significant advantage in negotiations, investments, and strategic decision-making. Musk’s ambitious vision of colonizing Mars exemplifies how informational power can be leveraged to shape future endeavors and influence stakeholders. Having access to critical, exclusive, or complex information enables negotiators to craft compelling arguments and make informed proposals that sway negotiations in their favor.

Contextual Power

Contextual power arises from a deep understanding of the environment, organizational culture, and the underlying context in which negotiations occur. Jayalalitha, the late chief minister of Tamil Nadu, India, exemplifies this kind of power. She possessed local knowledge and contextual intelligence, which allowed her to read political landscapes effectively. Her ability to anticipate challenges and have a strong BATNA (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement) enabled her to negotiate from a position of strength. Contextual power also requires emotional intelligence—understanding and responding to the needs, motivations, and emotions of others. Leaders who master contextual power can navigate complex environments, adapt strategies accordingly, and influence outcomes more effectively.

Understanding these diverse types of power provides negotiators with a toolkit to approach negotiations strategically. Whether through formal authority, personal relationships, expertise, or environmental awareness, skillful use of power enhances the likelihood of achieving favorable results while maintaining integrity and long-term relationships. However, it is crucial to balance power use with ethical considerations to prevent manipulation or achieving outcomes that could harm future interactions.

Conclusion

Power in negotiation is multifaceted, encompassing various sources such as positional authority, personal relationships, informational assets, and environmental understanding. Effective negotiators recognize the importance of cultivating and deploying these forms of power appropriately. While power can be a powerful tool for achieving one's goals, overreliance or misuse can undermine relationships and lead to less favorable outcomes. Therefore, strategic, ethical, and contextually aware application of power is essential for successful negotiations that are not only victorious but also sustainable in the long term.

References

• French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. (1959). The Bases of Social Power. Studies in Social Power, 150-167.
• Cialdini, R. B. (2006). Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. Harper Business.
• Follett, M. P. (1940). Dynamic Administration. A Critique. Harvard Business Review, 18(3), 113-129.
• Neulip, J., & Browning, L. (2014). Negotiation Strategies, Power, and Tactics. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 29(4), 31-41.
• Raven, B. (2008). The Bases of Power and the Power/Interaction Model of Interpersonal Influence. In J. T. Johnson (Ed.), The New Handbook of Organizational Communication (pp. 407-439). Sage Publications.
• Thompson, L. (2015). The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator. Pearson.
• Goleman, D. (1998). Working with Emotional Intelligence. Bantam.
• Lewicki, R. J., Saunders, D. M., & Barry, B. (2015). Negotiation. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Johnson, R. H., & Kray, L. J. (2016). Power and Negotiation. Organizational Dynamics, 45(4), 239-246.
• Pink, D. H. (2009). Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us. Riverhead Books.