In The Textbook, The Top Hat Organizer Is Used To Identify S
In The Textbook The Top Hat Organizer Is Used To Identify Similaritie
In the textbook, the Top Hat Organizer is used to identify similarities and differences. The chapter also discusses the importance of breaking down concepts and rebuilding concepts in new and meaningful ways for the Top Hat Organizer to be successful. Create a Top Hat Organizer in which you compare and contrast formative and summative assessments. In 250 words, summarize your outcome and how this activity helped you analyze the different types of assessments.
Paper For Above instruction
The activity of creating a Top Hat Organizer to compare and contrast formative and summative assessments significantly enhanced my understanding of these assessment types. By systematically breaking down each assessment's characteristics, purposes, and implementation strategies, I was able to clearly see their similarities and differences. Formative assessments are ongoing, low-stakes evaluations used during the learning process to monitor student understanding and guide instruction. Examples include quizzes, discussions, and reflections, which provide immediate feedback to both students and teachers. In contrast, summative assessments occur at the end of an instructional period and evaluate overall student achievement, such as final exams, standardized tests, and major projects. They often serve as a measure of student competence and determine final grades.
Creating the organizer required me to analyze each assessment type carefully, which helped deepen my understanding of their roles in the educational process. The activity also reinforced the importance of breaking down concepts into specific features, such as timing, purpose, and impact, and then rebuilding the comparison to visualize their relationships. This process not only clarified the distinct functions and benefits of formative and summative assessments but also enabled me to see how they complement each other in supporting student learning. Overall, this activity enhanced my analytical skills and gave me a more comprehensive perspective on assessment strategies, emphasizing the importance of using both types to foster continual growth and accurate evaluation in education.
References
- Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the Theory of Formative Assessment. Educational Assessment, 14(1), 7-25.
- Stiggins, R. J. (2005). From Formative Assessment to Assessment FOR Learning: A Path to Professional Development and School Improvement. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(4), 324-328.
- Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2014). Educational Assessment of Students. Pearson.
- Heritage, M. (2010). Formative Assessment: Making It Happen in the Classroom. Corwin Press.
- Marzano, R. J. (2010). Formative Assessment & Standards-Based grading. Marzano Research.
- Shepard, L. A. (2000). The Role of Assessment in a Learning Culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14.
- Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Grading and Feedback: How to Improve Student Learning. ASCD.
- Popham, W. J. (2008). Transformative Assessment. ASCD.
- Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (1998). Developing Formative Assessment in the Classroom. Paul Chapman Publishing.
- Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded Formative Assessment. Solution Tree Press.