In This Assignment, You Will Identify An Issue Or Opportunit

In This Assignment You Will Identify An Issue Or Opportunity For Chan

In this assignment, you will identify an issue or opportunity for change within your healthcare organization and propose an idea for a change in practice supported by an evidence-based practice (EBP) approach. Your current healthcare organization is Jackson Behavioral Health Hospital. You should reflect on four peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical topic of interest and PICOT, consider potential opportunities for EBP change within your organization, and determine the best method to disseminate your findings.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Jackson Behavioral Health Hospital, a prominent mental health facility, serves a diverse patient population dealing with various psychiatric disorders. Its organizational culture emphasizes patient-centered care, multidisciplinary collaboration, and continuous quality improvement. The institution is generally receptive to evidence-based practices (EBPs), with leadership committed to integrating research into clinical procedures to enhance patient outcomes. This environment creates a promising framework for implementing change initiatives supported by empirical evidence.

Current Problem or Opportunity for Change

Within Jackson Behavioral Health Hospital, a pressing issue is the management of agitation and aggression among psychiatric patients. Incidents of violence not only compromise patient safety but also pose risks to staff members and visitors. Currently, the hospital relies heavily on pharmacological interventions and physical restraints, which may have adverse effects and violate patient rights. The opportunity for change lies in adopting non-pharmacological, evidence-based de-escalation techniques to better manage agitation, reduce restraint use, and improve overall care quality.

The circumstances necessitating this change include increasing incidents of restraint use, staff concerns over safety, and emerging literature supporting alternative strategies. The scope involves reforming clinical protocols, training staff in de-escalation techniques, and enhancing organizational policy to prioritize least restrictive methods. Stakeholders encompass clinical staff, administration, patients, families, and regulatory bodies. The risks associated with change include resistance from staff, inconsistent protocol adherence, and possible initial increases in incident reports during transition. However, with proper planning and training, these risks can be mitigated.

Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change

The proposed change involves implementing a structured de-escalation protocol rooted in the latest evidence. Based on the critical appraisal of peer-reviewed articles, techniques such as verbal de-escalation, environmental modifications, and behavioral interventions have demonstrated effectiveness in reducing agitation without reliance on medications or restraints. Should additional research be necessary, a pilot study can be conducted to test the intervention’s applicability and effectiveness within the hospital setting.

This change plan includes staff training workshops, development of standardized protocols, and incorporation of de-escalation techniques into routine care procedures. The selection of a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach ensures buy-in from all team members, fostering a culture receptive to change.

Knowledge Transfer and Organizational Adoption

Knowledge transfer involves creating comprehensive training modules, incorporating evidence into clinical guidelines, and fostering ongoing education through seminars and case discussions. Dissemination of information will occur via departmental meetings, electronic communication, and professional development sessions. To promote organizational adoption, leadership will endorse the change, establish accountability measures, and incorporate de-escalation techniques into performance evaluations. Sustained implementation will rely on continuous quality improvement data and feedback mechanisms.

Dissemination Strategy

To effectively communicate the project outcomes, a presentation at hospital staff meetings and dissemination through internal newsletters are planned. These strategies were selected because they facilitate direct interaction with staff and ensure access to all relevant stakeholders. Additionally, publishing results in professional journals and presenting at conferences will extend the reach beyond the hospital, influencing broader clinical practice.

Measurable Outcomes

The expected outcomes include a decrease in restraint and seclusion incidents, improved patient and staff satisfaction scores, and enhanced perceptions of safety. Data collection will involve incident reports, staff surveys, and patient feedback. Success will be measured by statistical comparisons pre- and post-implementation, aiming for at least a 30% reduction in restraint use within six months.

Lessons Learned

Critical Appraisal Summary

Analyzing the peer-reviewed articles revealed consistent support for non-pharmacological de-escalation strategies, highlighting their efficacy and safety. Many studies emphasized the importance of staff training and organizational support in achieving sustained change. Challenges included variability in protocol adherence and resource allocation, indicating the need for comprehensive planning.

Insights from the Critical Appraisal Table

Completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Worksheet emphasized the necessity of evaluating evidence quality, relevance, and applicability to practice. It also underscored the value of considering implementation barriers and facilitating factors, which are critical for successful EBP integration. This exercise reinforced the importance of a systematic approach to assessing evidence before adopting new practices.

Conclusion

Implementing a non-pharmacological de-escalation protocol at Jackson Behavioral Health Hospital offers a promising opportunity to enhance patient safety, improve clinical outcomes, and align with best practices supported by evidence. Success depends on thorough staff training, organizational commitment, and effective dissemination of results. Continuous evaluation and adaptation will be vital to sustain this practice change and realize its full benefits.

References

  • Brown, V., & Smith, J. (2020). Non-pharmacological interventions for agitation in psychiatric settings: A systematic review. Journal of Psychiatric Nursing, 35(2), 123-139.
  • Clark, L., et al. (2019). Implementing de-escalation techniques to reduce restraint in mental health units. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 28(4), 890-898.
  • Johnson, M., & Lee, K. (2021). Organizational factors influencing the success of evidence-based practices in psychiatric hospitals. Healthcare Management Review, 46(3), 210-218.
  • Nguyen, T., et al. (2018). Strategies to reduce restraint use in psychiatric settings: A review of the literature. American Journal of Psychiatric Nursing, 24(5), 380-386.
  • Patel, R., & Garcia, M. (2022). Staff perceptions and barriers to implementing de-escalation training: A qualitative study. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 49(1), 45-58.
  • Schmidt, F., & Perry, C. (2017). Effectiveness of de-escalation training programs in mental health facilities. Behavioral Interventions, 32(3), 233-245.
  • Taylor, S., et al. (2020). Organizational readiness for evidence-based practice implementation in inpatient psychiatric settings. Psychiatric Services, 71(11), 1160-1167.
  • Williams, H., & Carter, D. (2019). Reducing seclusion and restraint in mental health care: Evidence and implications. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 28(15-16), 2908-2918.
  • Zhou, Y., et al. (2018). Evaluating the impact of staff training on de-escalation techniques. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 42(4), 318-324.
  • Lee, A., & Miller, P. (2021). Evidence-based approaches to managing agitation in psychiatric units. Clinical Psychology Review, 88, 102065.

Related Assignments