In This Module We Will Be Discussing The Concept Of Utilitar

In This Module We Will Be Discussing The Concept Of Utilitarianism A

In this module we will be discussing the concept of utilitarianism. After reviewing the presentation from Pearson Learning Solutions and/or the podcast in the background materials, consider an ethical issue that occurred in a business setting that might be examined using utilitarian ethical principles and assess the situation from a utilitarian perspective. Comment on the usefulness and some of the problems with this approach in relation to evaluating situations from an ethical position.

Paper For Above instruction

Utilitarianism, as a normative ethical theory, emphasizes the maximization of overall happiness or utility as the fundamental principle for evaluating moral actions. In a business context, this approach often guides decision-makers toward choices that produce the greatest good for the greatest number, balancing various stakeholders' interests. To illustrate this, consider a scenario where a company faces the dilemma of whether to outsource manufacturing to a country with cheaper labor costs but with less stringent environmental and labor protections.

From a utilitarian perspective, the decision to outsource might be justified if it results in higher profits, lower prices for consumers, and increased employment opportunities domestically, thus generating greater overall happiness. The outsourcing could lead to significant savings for the company, benefiting shareholders and enabling competitive pricing, which contributes to consumer satisfaction. Additionally, increased profits may allow the business to expand, creating more jobs. However, this decision also raises concerns about potential negative impacts, such as poor working conditions in the outsourcing country and environmental degradation, which could diminish overall utility.

Assessing the situation through utilitarian principles involves weighing the benefits against the harms. If the aggregate happiness from increased profits, lower costs, and job creation outweighs the suffering caused by exploitation or environmental harm, the decision would be deemed ethically justified within a utilitarian framework. Conversely, if the negative consequences—such as worker exploitation or ecological damage—substantially outweigh the positive outcomes, the decision would be viewed as unethical.

The usefulness of utilitarianism in ethical decision-making lies in its focus on tangible outcomes and its capacity to provide a clear, pragmatic basis for evaluating actions. It encourages businesses to consider the broader impact of their decisions on all stakeholders, promoting socially responsible conduct aimed at maximizing overall well-being.

Nonetheless, this approach faces several problems. One major challenge is the difficulty in accurately predicting all consequences of a business decision, especially long-term impacts or unintended side effects. For example, quantifying happiness or suffering across varied stakeholders with different values and perceptions is inherently complex. Furthermore, utilitarianism can justify actions that are ethically questionable if the outcomes produce a net benefit—for instance, sacrificing minority rights for the majority’s happiness—highlighting potential conflicts with principles of justice and individual rights.

Another issue is the potential for bias in outcome assessment, where decision-makers may overemphasize certain benefits and downplay harms. Additionally, utilitarianism tends to overlook the moral importance of actions themselves, focusing instead on outcomes, which can lead to justifying morally dubious behaviors if they lead to favorable results.

In conclusion, utilitarianism offers a practical framework for evaluating ethical issues in business by emphasizing the pursuit of overall happiness. While it promotes a results-oriented approach that can enhance corporate social responsibility, it also presents significant challenges, including difficulties in outcome prediction and ethical conflicts between utility maximization and individual rights. Therefore, while useful, utilitarianism should be applied cautiously and complemented with other ethical considerations to ensure balanced and justice-oriented decision-making in business practices.

References

• Mill, J. S. (1863). Utilitarianism. Parker, Son, and Bourn.
• Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press.
• Singer, P. (2011). Practical Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
• Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. California Management Review, 26(2), 53–73.
• Shaw, W. H. (2016). Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making & Cases. Cengage Learning.
• Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press.
• Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2016). Business Ethics: Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization. Oxford University Press.
• Hartman, L. P., & DesJardins, J. R. (2011). Business Ethics: Decision Making for Personal Integrity and Social Responsibility. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
• Rachels, J., & Rachels, S. (2019). Introducing Ethical Theories. Routledge.