In This Unit's Discussion Board We Will Discuss How To Apply

In This Units Discussion Board We Will Discuss How To Apply Model Ii

In this unit's discussion board, we will discuss how to apply Model II values within a global society, as companies from different macrocultures (e.g., American culture, Chinese culture) experience conflict. Begin by watching the following video, located in the Films on Demand database within the Waldorf Online Library: Google China Standoff (48 minutes) If this video is no longer available through the Films on Demand database, instead watch the following video from the Films on Demand database: "China Inside Out: Building Relationships with the Next Superpower." Use this video to inform your discussion board post, and include the following elements in your post: Discuss the espoused values and the real values of one of the individuals, organizations, or macrocultures included in this video. Also, discuss the clues you observed that may indicate its values and deep, underlying assumptions. Based on who you are and the lens through which you see the world, how did your own perspective influence how you interpreted the characters portrayed in the video? In support of Model II values, how should the U.S. move forward in its trade with China, despite the differences in deep, underlying assumptions between these two macrocultures?

Paper For Above instruction

In the context of globalization and intercultural interactions, the application of Model II values becomes essential for fostering mutual understanding and resolving conflicts between different macrocultures, such as American and Chinese cultures. This discussion centers around analyzing a specific case documented in the "Google China Standoff" or the "China Inside Out" documentary, focusing on the values and underlying assumptions of the involved entities. Furthermore, it explores how personal perspectives influence interpretation and offers pathways for the United States to navigate its trade relationship with China based on Model II principles.

Understanding Espoused and Real Values

Espoused values are the publicly declared principles and standards that an individual, organization, or culture claims to uphold. In the case of Chinese macroculture, espoused values often emphasize collectivism, harmony, respect for authority, and social stability. For instance, Chinese governmental institutions advocate for long-term stability, economic development, and societal harmony, which they publicly promote. Conversely, real values—those that are truly prioritized—may sometimes reflect underlying priorities like maintaining control, suppressing dissent, or asserting national sovereignty. These hidden values can lead to discrepancies between stated goals and actual behaviors.

American culture, generally characterized by individualism, innovation, and transparency, espouses values such as free enterprise, human rights, and open communication. However, real values may sometimes conflict with these espoused principles due to pragmatic considerations like economic interests or political strategies. For example, American technological companies might publicly advocate for open markets but engage in strategic partnerships that serve corporate interests.

Clues Indicating Values and Deep Assumptions

In analyzing the videos, several subtle clues serve as indicators of underlying values and assumptions. In the "Google China Standoff," for example, China's emphasis on sovereignty and control becomes evident through its regulatory actions and insistence on censorship, which reflect deep-seated assumptions about state authority and social stability. Likewise, the U.S. portrayal of innovation and free enterprise reveals underlying assumptions about individual rights and market freedoms. Non-verbal cues, language choices, and decision-making patterns also provide insights into what each culture fundamentally prioritizes.

The Chinese approach to negotiations, often characterized by patience and indirect communication, suggests an underlying value placed on relationship-building and face-saving. Conversely, the American tendency toward directness and quick resolution indicates a value system rooted in efficiency and transparency. Recognizing these cues enhances understanding of the deeper cultural frameworks guiding behavior.

Influence of Personal Perspective on Interpretation

As an observer, my cultural background and personal experiences inherently shape my interpretation of the characters and actions depicted. For example, as an individual raised in a Western individualistic society, I might initially perceive China's emphasis on collectivism and hierarchical authority as overly restrictive or oppressive. Conversely, someone from a culture that values harmony and social stability might interpret these same behaviors as pragmatic and respectful. Awareness of my biases allows for a more nuanced understanding of the complex motivations behind each character's actions and decisions.

My perspective influences which aspects I emphasize or overlook—what I interpret as conflict versus cooperation, or transparency versus concealment. Recognizing these biases is vital for approaching intercultural conflicts with humility and openness, aligning with Model II's emphasis on understanding and trust.

Supporting Model II Values in U.S.-China Trade Relations

Model II values—openness, respect, discovery, and genuine dialogue—are fundamental for the U.S. to foster a sustainable and mutually beneficial relationship with China. Moving forward, the U.S. should prioritize building trust through transparent communication and respect for China's underlying values and perspectives. This entails recognizing China's pursuit of social stability and sovereignty as legitimate, even if they differ from Western notions of transparency and individual rights.

Practically, this approach involves engaging in bilateral negotiations where both parties openly articulate their underlying interests and constraints. It requires patience, active listening, and willingness to adapt strategies to accommodate cultural differences without compromising core principles. For example, incorporating Chinese perspectives on social stability into trade agreements and joint ventures sets the foundation for trust, reducing misunderstandings and conflicts.

Furthermore, emphasizing cultural understanding through exchange programs, joint research, and educational initiatives can promote empathy and shared values. Such efforts align with the core tenets of Model II, which prioritize building genuine relationships based on mutual respect and understanding rather than superficial compliance or unilateral impositions.

Conclusion

In conclusion, applying Model II values in U.S.-China trade relations necessitates a nuanced understanding of underlying cultural values and assumptions. Recognizing the differences between espoused and real values, decoding the clues to underlying assumptions, and reflecting on one's own perspective are crucial steps toward effective intercultural engagement. By fostering openness, respect, and trust—key components of Model II—the U.S. can navigate the complex landscape of Sino-American relations, fostering collaboration that benefits both nations and promotes global stability.

References

• Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
• Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond Culture. Anchor Books.
• Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. Sage Publications.
• Kim, Y. Y. (2001). Becoming Interculturally Competent. In B. L. Soloman & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Handbook of International and Intercultural Communication (pp. 647-666). Sage Publications.
• Mor Barak, M. E. (2017). Managing Diversity: Toward a Globally Inclusive Workplace. Sage Publications.
• National Intelligence Council. (2012). Global Trends 2030: Alternative Worlds. NIC.
• Spitzberg, B. H., & Cupach, W. R. (1984). Interpersonal Communication Competence. SAGE Publications.
• Thomas, D. C., & Inkson, K. (2009). Cultural Intelligence: Living and Working Globally. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
• Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism & Collectivism. Westview Press.
• Zhang, Y. B., & Thomas, D. C. (2015). Understanding Chinese Business Culture. Journal of World Business, 50(3), 546-558.