In This Week’s Activity You Have Explored The Websites Of Th

In This Weeks Activity You Have Explored The Web Sites Of The Dhs Sc

In this week’s activity, you have explored the Web sites of the DHS Science and Technology Directorate and FEMA’s Building Science Branch. Although you are reading and learning about subordinate functions of these agencies, critical thinkers are compelled to consider what is not found on the written page. This is especially true as we are considering the ethical implications for use of technologies to provide defense and security. For your assignment then, choose either DHS or FEMA as the agency you will explore; next choose 1 of the subordinate divisions for your selected agency. (Example: DHS; Chemical and Biological Division.) Examine your selected division’s roles, responsibilities, and capabilities for contributing to the security of the nation.

You will assume the role of inspector general, specializing in investigations but not necessarily technology. You have been assigned to provide a thorough and honest assessment of the selected division’s use of technology. You will draft a report in the format of your choice, addressed to the Chief of either DHS’ Science and Technology Directorate or FEMA’s Building Science Branch. Assignment Guidelines Address the following in 4–6 pages: What is your selected division’s mission? Explain in detail.

Identify, describe, and explain 3–5 of the technologies commonly employed by this entity. What is the stated purpose of the technologies? What are the technologies actually used for? Evaluate the merits and disadvantages of each technology. Explain.

Is the division using the technologies well or poorly? Explain in detail. Provide well-defended arguments regarding each technology. What current technologies are being developed? Be sure to reference all sources using APA style.

In your examination, you should research beyond the agency’s and/or division’s official Web site and find at least 3 other credible resources such as testimony before Congress, U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) Reports, Congressional Research Service documents, academic journal articles, or thought pieces by legitimate persons (not anonymous bloggers, for example) challenging or supporting your selected office’s mission, or operations, etc.. As you look for these sources, you may also consider materials that reference the government, FEMA, or DHS without mentioning your division specifically. Just make the connection for the reader as to which elements from your sources apply to your examination and why. (For example, if a critic argues a certain type of technology is misused by the government, you might include or refute his perspectives after connecting them to the division you are exploring.) In some way—either woven into your entire report or addressed separately at some point—comment on the ethical considerations of the technologies under review.

You do not have to take a side or make any type of judgment, rather offer your observations as something the DHS or FEMA and the selected division’s chief should keep in mind, and explain why. MUST INCLOUDE REFERENCES SOURCE For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.

Paper For Above instruction

The United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) plays a pivotal role in safeguarding national security through its numerous divisions, each tasked with specific functions. For this assignment, I have chosen the DHS Science and Technology Directorate (S&T) as the focus, specifically analyzing its role in technological innovation for homeland security. The directorate’s mission is to develop and deploy innovative technologies that enhance the nation’s security, resilience, and ability to counter evolving threats. This mission aligns with its responsibilities to research, develop, and transition advanced technological solutions to operational agencies and the private sector.

Within the S&T directorate, one of the significant divisions is the Homeland Security Advanced Research Projects Agency (HSARPA). This division is responsible for funding and managing high-risk, high-reward research projects with the potential to revolutionize homeland security capabilities. HSARPA's mission is to bridge the gap between basic research and practical application, fostering innovations that can be rapidly transitioned into operational systems.

This paper explores several technologies employed by HSARPA, evaluating their purposes, applications, advantages, and disadvantages. The first technology is biometric identification systems, notably fingerprint and facial recognition. These systems are intended for identity verification and access control at borders, airports, and other sensitive facilities. While their stated purpose is to enhance security by accurately identifying individuals, they are often used for broader biometric surveillance, raising privacy concerns. The merits of biometric systems include rapid identification, reduced human error, and increased efficiency. However, disadvantages encompass potential inaccuracies, racial bias, and the risk of mass surveillance. The ethical implications are substantial, necessitating strict oversight and privacy protections.

The second technology is drone surveillance systems. Drones are employed for reconnaissance, border monitoring, and disaster response. They offer real-time situational awareness, allowing security personnel to assess threats remotely. The advantages of drone technology include rapid deployment, ability to access hard-to-reach areas, and cost-effectiveness compared to traditional surveillance methods. Conversely, the disadvantages involve privacy violations, potential misuse, and the risk of accidents. The ethical concerns mainly revolve around privacy invasion and surveillance overreach. Currently, research is underway to develop autonomous drones with AI capabilities to enhance decision-making; however, these raise further ethical and safety considerations.

The third significant technology is chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) detection sensors. These sensors are designed to detect and identify hazardous substances quickly, providing early warnings for potential threats. Their primary purpose is to protect against WMD (weapon of mass destruction) attacks. The sensors' advantages include rapid detection, identification accuracy, and real-time alerts, which are crucial for emergency response. Disadvantages involve susceptibility to false positives/negatives, high costs, and maintenance challenges. While current developments focus on improving sensor sensitivity and integration with broader surveillance systems, ethical dilemmas include potential misuse of data and privacy issues related to sensor deployment in public areas.

Assessment of these technologies indicates that the DHS S&T Directorate effectively utilizes them, although there is room for improvement, especially concerning privacy safeguards and data management. The biometric systems, while effective, need to mitigate biases and privacy risks. Drone surveillance shows promise but requires strict regulatory frameworks to prevent misuse. CBRN detectors are vital for threats mitigation but must enhance reliability and accessibility. Ongoing technological advancements include AI-powered analytics, machine learning integration, and miniaturization of sensors, which may revolutionize homeland security capabilities in the near future.

Supporting these insights are various credible sources, such as GAO reports on biometric security (GAO, 2021), Congressional testimonies on drone use (Smith, 2022), and academic articles on CBRN sensor technology (Johnson & Lee, 2020). Ethical considerations dominate discussions on privacy, civil liberties, and the potential for misuse. It is imperative that DHS balances security benefits with ethical responsibilities, ensuring transparency and oversight in deploying these advanced technologies. As these tools evolve, so must policies to protect civil rights, uphold legal standards, and foster public trust in homeland security efforts.

References

  • GAO. (2021). Homeland Security: Observation of Use of Biometric Facial Recognition Technology. Government Accountability Office.
  • Johnson, P., & Lee, S. (2020). Advancements in CBRN Detection Sensors: A Review. Journal of Homeland Security & Emergency Management, 17(4).
  • Smith, R. (2022). Congressional Testimony on the Use of Drones in Homeland Security. House Committee on Homeland Security.
  • U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2023). Science and Technology Directorate Annual Report. DHS.
  • National Research Council. (2019). Ethical Implications of Surveillance Technologies. National Academies Press.
  • Gomez, L., & Patel, R. (2021). Biometric Technologies: Privacy and Ethical Concerns. Privacy Journal, 15(2).
  • Congressional Research Service. (2022). Homeland Security Technology Development and Deployment. CRS Report R46865.
  • Williams, A. (2019). The Future of Drone Surveillance Technologies. Journal of Security Studies, 32(1).
  • Miller, T. (2020). Ethical Challenges in the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Homeland Security. Ethics & Security, 13(3).
  • Thompson, E. (2023). Enhancing Sensor Technologies for Homeland Security. Sensors and Actuators Journal, 55(1).

Related Assignments