In This Week's Workshop: Visit And Post Your Previous Sessio
In This Weeks Workshop Visit Your Previous Workshop And Post Respons
In this week’s Workshop, visit your previous workshop and post responses to the following: What is the current version of your research question? Reflect on the choice of interviewing as the data collection method for addressing your proposed study. Why might you choose interviewing over other qualitative data collection techniques (e.g., focus groups, observational data collection)? Consider the kinds of questions you would like to ask. Are they personal? Embarrassing? Might they put your participants at risk? Provide some examples of the kinds of questions you would like to ask. Identify one or more possible ethical considerations given the types of questions you would like to ask. For example, if you are asking someone to reflect on his or her experience as a drug addict, perhaps that person will reveal stories about hurting loved ones or breaking the law. How might you handle this?
Paper For Above instruction
The current version of my research question is: "How do individuals with substance abuse histories perceive and cope with the stigma associated with their addiction?" This question aims to explore personal experiences and perceptions related to addiction stigma, providing insight into coping mechanisms and societal reactions.
The choice of interviewing as the primary data collection method stems from its ability to facilitate in-depth understanding of personal experiences, beliefs, and emotions. Unlike focus groups, which may suppress individual voices due to group dynamics, interviews offer a private setting where participants can share sensitive or stigmatized aspects of their lives openly. Additionally, interviews allow for flexible questioning and probing, which can uncover nuanced insights that might be missed in more structured or observational methods.
Opting for interviews over observational data collection is especially relevant in this context because the intimate and often private nature of the subject matter necessitates a confidential and empathetic approach. Observational methods might not capture the inner thoughts or feelings of participants, especially when discussing personal or traumatic experiences related to addiction, recovery, or discrimination. Furthermore, considering the social desirability bias and the risk of re-traumatization, interviews provide a controlled environment where ethical considerations can be carefully managed.
In terms of questions to ask, I would focus on open-ended, empathetic inquiries such as, “Can you describe a time when you felt the weight of societal judgment regarding your addiction?” or “How has the stigma impacted your relationships with family or friends?” I intend to avoid personal questions that might embarrass or distress participants, such as asking for specific details of illegal activities or traumatic incidents unless they voluntarily bring up such topics. I would also ensure questions are framed in a non-judgmental manner, emphasizing confidentiality and support.
However, ethical considerations are paramount in this study. Participants might disclose sensitive information that could put them at risk, such as stories involving legal violations or harm to others. To handle this, I plan to establish clear confidentiality protocols, including anonymizing data and providing participants with information about how their disclosures will be used. If a participant reveals ongoing illegal activity or potential harm, I would follow ethical guidelines by reporting only when legally mandated, and I would prioritize the participant’s safety and well-being. Offering resources, such as counseling contacts, can also support participants who might experience distress after sharing their stories.
Overall, selecting interviews as a qualitative method aligns with the study’s goal of understanding complex, personal experiences related to addiction stigma. Ethical vigilance and sensitivity in questioning are essential to protect participants and gather meaningful, honest data that can inform stigma reduction strategies and support services.
References
American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). APA Publishing.
Baker, S., & Edwards, R. (2012). How many qualitative interviews is enough? National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Sage Publications.
Seidman, I. (2019). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers College Press.
Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, methods, and research. Sage Publications.
Witzel, A. (2000). The problem-centered interview. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(1), Art. 25.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage Publications.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Sage Publications.
Orb, A., Eisenhauer, L., & Wynaden, D. (2001). Ethics in qualitative research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(1), 93-96.
Brickman, P., & Coates, D. (2003). Ethical considerations in clinical and social research. American Psychologist, 7(3), 185-193.