In Three To Four Pages, Set Up A Comparison Between

In Three To Four Pages You Are To Set Up a Comparison Between a Curren

In three to four pages, you are to set up a comparison between a current (within the last 5 years) event/issue/figure and a historical event/issue/figure (10 or more years ago). These MUST be different things (in other words, you cannot compare farming/music/skateboards as it/they is/are today and as it/they was/were “back then”). You will analyze the similarities between the two and explain why the comparison is significant. This paper MUST be in MLA format; your Works Cited page should include at least 3 sources (note, the Works Cited page does NOT count towards your page length).

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment requires a comparative analysis between a recent event, issue, or figure—specifically within the last five years—and a historical event, issue, or figure from at least ten years ago. Importantly, the comparison must involve two distinct and different subjects; for example, one cannot compare the contemporary music scene with the music of a century ago, nor can it include mundane comparisons like farming or skateboarding unless they directly relate to the specific subjects chosen. The core objective is to identify similarities, analyze their significance, and offer insights into how and why these similarities matter within a broader socio-cultural or political context.

Choosing appropriate subjects for comparison is critical. For instance, students might compare the COVID-19 pandemic and the 1918 influenza pandemic, examining their social, economic, and health impacts while exploring how societies managed health crises across different time periods. Alternatively, one might compare recent social justice movements like Black Lives Matter (2013–present) with earlier civil rights movements such as the 1960s Civil Rights Movement, analyzing themes of activism, media influence, and policy changes over time. The key is to select subjects that are sufficiently distinct in their nature but share elements that lend themselves to meaningful analysis.

Structuring the paper involves first providing an introduction that clearly states the subjects being compared and the significance of the comparison. This should be followed by body paragraphs that delve into specific aspects of each subject—such as causes, societal responses, consequences, and public perception—and then analyze their similarities. For example, both movements may have emerged as responses to systemic issues, garnered widespread media coverage, and prompted legislative or institutional change. Exploring these overlaps can reveal patterns in societal reactions to crises or injustices across different eras.

Analyzing the significance of these similarities involves contextualizing the comparison within broader frameworks. For example, does the comparison reveal evolving public attitudes toward activism? Does it highlight technological advancements that shape public engagement or dissemination of information? Does it suggest persistent systemic issues that transcend time? Reflecting on these questions enriches the analysis and demonstrates critical thinking.

The paper must adhere to MLA format, which includes in-text citations and a Works Cited page with at least three credible sources. These sources may include scholarly articles, books, reputable news outlets, or official reports that substantiate the analysis. Proper MLA formatting enhances credibility, allows readers to verify sources, and lends academic rigor to the paper.

Overall, the assignment encourages careful selection of contrasting subjects, thorough analysis, and clear, organized writing that effectively communicates the significance of the comparison. Adequately balancing descriptive detail with analytical insight over the three to four pages is essential to meet the expectations of this academic task.

References

• Author, A. (Year). Title of Book or Article. Publisher or Journal Name.
• Author, B. (Year). Title of Second Source. Publisher or Journal Name.
• Author, C. (Year). Title of Third Source. Publisher or Journal Name.
• Additional sources should be credible, properly cited in MLA format, and relevant to the comparison topic.