In Today’s Correctional Environment It Is Very Important To

In Todays Correctional Environment It Is Very Important To Establish

In today’s correctional environment, it is very important to establish a method of correctional treatment. In this assignment, you will address the following scenario: As a correctional administrator, you are in charge of a boot camp filled with males who were sentenced there as a last resort. The offenders have committed nonviolent crimes and have a minimum of a high school diploma. If you were a correctional administrator, which correctional treatment model would you subscribe to? Explain your answer by giving examples on how the correctional treatment model would improve your facility.

Assignment Guidelines: Address the following in 3–5 paragraphs: Which of the 2 correctional treatment models would you apply to the above scenario? Why? Specifically, how would this model improve the facility? How would the scenario have to change for you to select the alternate model?

Paper For Above instruction

In the contemporary correctional environment, choosing an appropriate correctional treatment model is vital to the success of rehabilitation and the safety of both staff and offenders. For this scenario, involving a boot camp with nonviolent male offenders who have at least a high school diploma, the most suitable model would be the rehabilitative approach, emphasizing education, behavioral modification, and social skills development. This model focuses on transforming offenders into law-abiding citizens by addressing the root causes of their behavior and equipping them with tools for reintegration into society. Implementing this model within the facility would primarily involve structured programs that foster positive behaviors, accountability, and skill acquisition, which can significantly improve overall outcomes.

The rehabilitative correctional treatment model would benefit the facility by reducing recidivism rates and promoting long-term behavioral change. For example, integrating educational programs and vocational training tailored to the offenders' interests and capabilities would enhance their employability upon release. Such initiatives could include anger management classes, substance abuse counseling if applicable, and life skills workshops. These programs would not only improve individual offenders but also foster a safer and more productive environment within the boot camp. The structured nature of the rehabilitative model aligns well with the disciplined environment of a boot camp, where consistency and routine can be leveraged to reinforce positive behaviors.

However, for the correctional treatment model to shift towards a different approach, such as the social control model emphasizing discipline and order, the scenario would need to involve higher-risk offenders, possibly with histories of violent crimes or past disciplinary issues that threaten institutional safety. In such cases, a focus on strict supervision, discipline, and order might take precedence over rehabilitative efforts. Alternatively, if the offenders demonstrated resistance to change or lacked motivation for rehabilitation, a more security-focused, incident management approach might be necessary. Nonetheless, given the described scenario, the rehabilitative model remains the most appropriate and beneficial choice for fostering positive change and reducing future offending.

In conclusion, selecting the rehabilitative correctional treatment model aligns well with the characteristics of the offenders in this scenario. Its focus on education, skill development, and behavioral change not only supports individual rehabilitation but also enhances the overall safety and effectiveness of the correctional facility. Adapting the model based on the offenders’ risk levels and behavioral history can further optimize the correctional environment for long-term success and societal reintegration.

References

- Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). The Psychology of Criminal Conduct (5th ed.). Routledge.

- Cullen, F. T., & Gendreau, P. (2000). Assessing Correctional Rehabilitation: Policy, Practice, and Prospects. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27(2), 179-203.

- Gendreau, P., & Ross, R. R. (1987). Revitalizing Correctional Treatment: Today’s Challenge. Crime & Delinquency, 33(4), 472-491.

- Harris, P. W. (2010). Correctional Approaches to Crime Prevention. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 21(2), 219-234.

- Maruna, S. (2001). Making Good: How Ex-Convicts Reform and Rebuild Their Lives. American Psychological Association.

- Prison Fellowship. (2019). The Effectiveness of Rehabilitation Programs. Retrieved from https://www.prisonfellowship.org

- Taxman, F. S., & Belenko, S. (2014). Improving the Quality and Cost-Effectiveness of Crime Prevention Programs. Routledge.

- Wester, P. (2017). The Role of Education in Correctional Treatment. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 56(2), 77-93.

- Wilson, D. B., Bouffard, J. A., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2005). A Quantitative Review of Structured, Group-Oriented, Cognitive-behavioral Programs for Offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(1), 123-132.

- Wright, J. P., & Wright, P. M. (2017). Juvenile Rehabilitation and Correctional Strategies. Sage Publications.