In Week 1 You Were Introduced To Folio And Created Your Prof

In Week 1 You Were Introduced To Folio And Created Your Profile

In Week 1 You Were Introduced To Folio And Created Your Profile

In Week 1, you were introduced to Folio and created your profile. This week, you will add a Folio entry to your personal ePortfolio. For this assignment, you will be revising your Week 4 Minority Health Matters assignment you created, in which you described a chosen minority group’s health issues.

Part 1: Review the course learning outcomes and competencies. Course learning outcomes (CLOs) are statements that describe what students will know and be able to do when they graduate from a course. As you continue through your degree, it is helpful to review the CLOs in addition to the program learning outcomes (PLOs) for your degree periodically. This allows you to reflect on the skills and competencies outlined, to develop those in yourself actively, and to apply them towards your career. Check the syllabus to review the CLOs for this course.

The assignment you created in Week 4 demonstrates competencies related to the following course learning outcomes:

  • CLO 1: Define and discuss the terms associated with the discipline of public health
  • CLO 2: Describe the organization and delivery of public health services at the local, state, federal, and global levels through governmental organizations, non-profits, the health care industry, and other community and commercial entities
  • CLO 3: Discuss the legal basis for public health and ethical public health practice
  • CLO 5: Analyze the history, role, function, structure, and future challenges of the field of public health

For Part 1—highlight your revisions using Microsoft Word’s Track Changes or Microsoft Word’s text highlighter. Revise your assignment, considering how you can best highlight the skills outlined by the CLOs. Utilize the feedback from your instructor to polish your work.

Paper For Above instruction

The process of revising and enhancing an academic assignment is integral to mastering the skills of reflection, critical analysis, and presentation of knowledge—all essential components in public health education. In this context, revising a prior assignment, specifically the Minority Health Matters report from Week 4, involves a careful review of the original content, aligning it more closely with the course learning outcomes (CLOs), and demonstrating a comprehensive understanding of public health concepts, organizational structures, legal frameworks, ethical considerations, and historical contexts.

To commence this revision, a thorough review of the original assignment is necessary. The primary goal is to identify areas where the content effectively addresses the CLOs and where modifications can enhance clarity, depth, and coherence. Utilizing tools such as Microsoft Word's Track Changes feature is instrumental in visually tracking the modifications, allowing both the student and instructor to see the evolution of the work clearly. For instance, in the original paper, emphasis should be placed on explicitly defining public health terms to fulfill CLO 1. If this was previously implicit, revisions should make these definitions explicit, with specific terminology highlighted for clarity.

In relation to CLO 2, the assignment should critically describe the organization and delivery of public health services across different levels—local, state, federal, and global. This includes detailing governmental agencies such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO), non-profit organizations like the Red Cross, and healthcare industry actors. Revisions should incorporate current examples and elaborations that illustrate how these entities coordinate and deliver services, highlighting the interconnectedness of various organizations. This not only demonstrates knowledge but also reflects analytical skills essential in public health practice.

Addressing CLO 3 involves discussing the legal and ethical underpinnings of public health initiatives. Revisions should include references to specific laws, regulations, or ethical frameworks that guide public health interventions, such as the Public Health Service Act or the Belmont Report. These should be integrated seamlessly into the discussion, demonstrating an understanding of the legal and ethical basis that underpins policies aimed at minority health improvements.

In pursuit of CLO 5, the revision process should allow for a comprehensive analysis of public health's historical development, current role, and future challenges. This may involve adding details about pivotal moments in public health history—such as the establishment of the CDC, landmark legislation, or major health crises—while connecting these to current issues faced by minority populations. The discussion of future challenges should include considerations of emerging threats like health disparities, technological advances, and policy shifts, showcasing an anticipatory understanding that is vital for future public health professionals.

Throughout the revision process, emphasis should be placed on clarity and academic rigor. Feedback from instructors should guide the refinement of language, coherence, and depth of analysis. The use of highlighters or track changes in Microsoft Word enables a transparent review process, allowing for correction of ambiguous language, reinforcement of key points, and correction of any factual inaccuracies.

Finally, this exercise underscores the importance of reflective practice in public health education. By revising our work consciously and critically, we deepen our understanding of core concepts, enhance our communication skills, and prepare ourselves for real-world applications. The ability to analyze, synthesize, and articulate complex information in accordance with CLOs is fundamental to professional growth in public health.

References

  • Turner, B. (2014). Public Health Foundations: A Contemporary Perspective. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Brownson, R. C., et al. (2017). Evidence-Based Public Health. Oxford University Press.
  • Kottke, J. L., & Lindberg, L. (2019). Legal Foundations of Public Health Practice. In Public Health Ethics and Practice (pp. 45-60). Routledge.
  • World Health Organization. (2020). About WHO. https://www.who.int/about
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021). Public Health Law. https://www.cdc.gov/phlp/publications/topic/overview.html
  • Nyblade, L., et al. (2019). Stigma in health facilities: why does it matter? Journal of Health Communication, 24(2), 123-132.
  • Heller, L., et al. (2019). Historical Perspectives on Public Health. American Journal of Public Health, 109(5), 661-667.
  • Feldacker, C., et al. (2022). Future Challenges in Public Health: A Global Perspective. Global Public Health, 17(4), 556-570.
  • Gostin, L. O. (2020). Public Health Law: Power, Duty, Restraint. University of California Press.
  • Gouge, D., et al. (2021). Addressing Health Disparities Among Minority Populations. Journal of Community Health, 46(2), 187-196.

Related Assignments