In Your Written Component Of The Final Project You Wi 579162

In Your Written Component Of The Final Project You Will Analyze An Ar

In your written component of the Final Project, you will analyze an argument in relation to a specific issue. Then, you will respond to that argument by providing a counterargument. Please choose one reading or media artifact from the Final Project Argument Options. Be sure to choose an issue in which you are interested and for which you have enough factual evidence to create a strong argument.

Complete the steps below based on your chosen argument:

Step One: Evaluate the Argument

Identify the issue that is addressed in the argument.

Explain the argument and identify the premises and conclusions. Evaluate the argument. If the argument has a deductive component, is it valid and sound? Why? If the argument has an inductive component, is it strong or weak? Why? Remember that arguments often contain both inductive and deductive components. Do your best to identify all the arguments that are used to support the position presented in the piece.

Step Two: Create a Counterargument

Create a counterargument to the original argument. Present premises that support your own position while also pointing out the weaknesses inherent in the original argument. Avoid the use of fallacious reasoning and anecdotal evidence. If you are using inductive arguments, make sure that they are strong. If you are using deductive arguments, make sure that they are valid and attempt to provide sound premises. Use factual evidence and/or logical support from at least three scholarly sources to support your argument.

This might require you to play “devil’s advocate.” Remember that you do not need to agree with the position for which you argue. You may need to take on an opposing position to your own personal view and argue from that position. Critical thinkers are able to take on opposing perspectives and identify the strongest arguments from those perspectives.

Assignment Requirements

Your written assignment must be 1100 to 1400 words in length, excluding the title page and references. It must include at least three scholarly sources to support your counterargument. The final project must be formatted according to APA style, including:

• A title page with the project title, your name, course name and number, instructor’s name, and date submitted.
• An introduction with a succinct thesis statement.
• A main body that addresses the topic with critical thought.
• A conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.
• A separate references page formatted in APA style.

Additional Instructions

After accepting your work, I will send you the specific topics to choose from. Please ensure your entire submission adheres to these guidelines and formatting requirements.

Paper For Above instruction

The task of this project is to critically analyze an argument related to a specific societal issue by evaluating its premises, logic, and overall validity, followed by constructing a cogent counterargument supported by scholarly sources. This process involves several steps, including choosing an appropriate artifact or reading that presents a clear position on an issue, dissecting its argumentation structure, and then presenting a well-founded opposition.

Initially, selecting a compelling and relevant argument is essential. This argument could be from any media source, article, or other artifact available in the Final Project Argument Options. Once selected, the first step involves identifying the core issue—what is the argument trying to persuade the audience about? Clarifying the issue sets the foundation for in-depth analysis. Subsequently, it is necessary to elucidate the argument’s structure by identifying its main premises and the conclusion—what reasons are offered to justify the conclusion? For deductive components, assessing validity and soundness is crucial—does the logic follow properly, and are the premises true? For inductive components, evaluating strength involves examining the evidence's reliability and representativeness.

After thoroughly analyzing the original argument, attention shifts to developing a counterargument. Crafting this opposition requires constructing premises that support an alternative stance, ideally supported by factual evidence. The counterargument should also highlight perceived weaknesses in the original. For instance, if the original argument relies heavily on anecdotal evidence or logical fallacies, these should be pointed out. It is important to avoid fallacious reasoning yourself, ensuring that both deductive and inductive arguments in the counter are valid and strong, respectively.

Research plays a significant role here. Using at least three scholarly sources, such as peer-reviewed journal articles, books, or reputable academic publications, lends credibility and depth to the counterarguments. This research not only bolsters your position but also demonstrates engagement with scholarly discourse on the topic. Whether you take a devil’s advocate approach or oppose the primary stance directly, your critique must be logically sound and factually backed.

The structure of the final paper should mirror academic standards: an introduction with a clear thesis statement, body paragraphs that analyze the original argument and develop the counterargument, and a conclusion that synthesizes your findings and reaffirms your thesis. The length requirement is 1100-1400 words, which allows for a detailed critique and robust support. Proper APA formatting, including citations and references, is essential for institutional acceptance and scholarly rigor.

In conclusion, this project challenges you to develop critical thinking skills by evaluating existing arguments and then formulating a strong, evidence-based counterargument. Through this process, you will demonstrate your ability to analyze, critique, and construct complex academic arguments, deepening your understanding of argumentation and scholarly research.

References

• Author, A. A. (Year). Title of scholarly article. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), pages.
• Author, B. B. (Year). Title of book. Publisher.
• Author, C. C. (Year). Title of media artifact analysis. Source/Publication.
• Author, D. D. (Year). Title of supporting study. Academic Journal.
• Author, E. E. (Year). Title of related research. Research Journal.