Incorporating Kohlberg's Stages Of Moral Development Into Th

Incorporating Kohlbergs Stages Of Moral Development Into The Justice

Imagine you are the chief of police responsible for ensuring that law enforcement officers uphold ethical standards throughout their careers. To inform your leadership, you review Chapters 7 through 9 of the relevant textbook and research Kohlberg’s stages of moral development, including two credible articles discussing Kohlberg’s theory, the distinction between Means and Ends, and Kantian ethics.

This paper will explore the three levels of Kohlberg’s moral development, how to address each within a police department, how officers can utilize the theory to evaluate different types of offenders, strategies to mitigate police corruption by managing self-interest and pursuit of pleasure, and three Prima Facie duties that law enforcement officers should uphold.

Understanding Kohlberg’s Three Levels of Moral Development

Kohlberg’s theory of moral development delineates three broad levels, each encompassing two stages, totaling six stages. The first level, Pre-Conventional Morality, features Stage 1 – obedience and punishment orientation, where moral reasoning is based on avoiding punishment; and Stage 2 – individualism and exchange, where actions are guided by self-interest and reciprocity. Within a police department, addressing this level involves clear rule enforcement, establishing consequences for misconduct, and reinforcing the importance of personal accountability to promote moral reasoning aligned with societal standards.

The second level, Conventional Morality, includes Stage 3 – good interpersonal relationships, emphasizing loyalty, trust, and approval; and Stage 4 – maintaining social order, which values law, authority, and duty. Police officers at this level should be encouraged through training programs that foster a sense of community service, emphasize adherence to laws, and promote teamwork that aligns individual conduct with societal expectations.

The third level, Post-Conventional Morality, comprises Stage 5 – social contract orientation, where laws are viewed as social agreements that can be questioned and revised if they violate justice; and Stage 6 – universal ethical principles, which are based on internal moral standards like justice, equality, and respect for human rights. To cultivate this moral reasoning among officers, leadership must promote ethical reflection, critical thinking, and engagement with philosophical principles such as Kantian ethics, which focus on duty and respect for persons.

Utilizing Kohlberg’s Theory to Evaluate Criminals at Different Stages

Police officers can employ Kohlberg’s stages to assess the moral reasoning of offenders, thereby tailoring intervention strategies. Offenders operating at Stage 1 might be motivated primarily by fear of punishment and could be more receptive to deterrence-based approaches. Those at Stage 3 may commit crimes influenced by peer approval or a desire to fulfill social expectations, requiring interventions focused on moral reasoning development and social reintegration. Criminals functioning at Stage 5 might recognize laws as social contracts and may obey rules if they see the fairness and societal necessity, making legal rationality a key element in their rehabilitation. Finally, offenders at Stage 6 display universal ethical principles, often engaging in criminal acts based on deep-seated moral beliefs, which necessitates engaging them in moral reasoning dialogues to explore justice and human rights.

Addressing Self-Interest and Pursuit of Pleasure to Prevent Police Corruption

Preventing police corruption requires addressing inherent self-interest and the pursuit of personal pleasure. First, implementing transparent accountability mechanisms, such as body cameras and independent oversight committees, can deter misconduct driven by self-interest. Second, fostering a department culture emphasizing integrity and ethical values, reinforced through continuous ethics training, helps align officers’ actions with moral standards rather than personal gain. Third, establishing clear consequences for corrupt behaviors and incentivizing ethical conduct through recognition programs can further diminish incentives for misconduct and encourage officers to prioritize community service over personal pleasure-seeking.

Prima Facie Duties for Law Enforcement Officers

Drawing from Ross’s ethical theory, three Prima Facie duties vital for law enforcement are:

1. Duty of Fidelity—maintaining honesty and truthful communication with the public, colleagues, and supervisors to build trust and credibility.
2. Duty of Justice—ensuring fairness, impartiality, and equitable treatment of all individuals, regardless of background or circumstance.
3. Duty of Beneficence—acting in ways that promote the welfare of the community and protect citizens’ rights and safety.

These duties embody the professional responsibilities of police officers and serve as guiding principles to navigate ethical dilemmas in the field.

Conclusion

Incorporating Kohlberg’s stages of moral development into policing practices enhances ethical leadership, fosters moral growth among officers, and improves interactions with offenders and the community. Addressing each level of moral reasoning within the department, applying the theory to understand offenders’ motivations, and establishing policies to combat corruption rooted in self-interest are essential steps toward ethical excellence. Upholding core Prima Facie duties further reinforces a moral framework that emphasizes trustworthiness, fairness, and the promotion of community well-being, ultimately strengthening the integrity of the justice system.

References

• Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Harvard University Press.
• Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays on Moral Development: Volume One, The Philosophy of Moral Development. Harper & Row.
• Rest, J. R., & Narvaez, D. (1998). Moral Development, Self-Identity, and Moral Behavior. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Moral Development in the Professions: Psychology and Applied Ethics (pp. 21-38). Allyn & Bacon.
• Pojman, L. P., & Fieser, J. (2018). Ethical Theory: Classics and Contemporary Readings (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
• Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why People Obey the Law. Princeton University Press.
• Kant, I. (1785/1993). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (M. Gregor, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.
• Walker, L. J. (2004). Moral Development. In N. Eisenberg, J. Strayer, & T. L. Hare (Eds.), Handbook of Moral Development (pp. 3-23). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Crane, T. (2014). Moral Philosophy: A Contemporary Introduction. Routledge.
• Resnik, D. B. (2018). The Ethics of Expertise in Law Enforcement. Journal of Law and Policy.
• Levine, M. (2017). Ethics and Policing: A Qualitative Approach. Police Quarterly, 20(2), 178-199.