Indicate Whether Each Of The Following Statements Is True

Indicate Whether Each Of The Following Statements Is True False Or U

Indicate whether each of the following statements is true, false, or uncertain, and explain your answer. Your grade will depend primarily on the quality of your explanation. If a word or phrase is underlined, your answer must include a concise definition of the word or phrase.

1. If money demand’s sensitivity to income increases, fiscal policy becomes weaker.

2. If investment’s sensitivity to the rate of interest decreases, monetary policy becomes stronger.

3. If the net exports variable does not depend on income and interest rates, monetary policy becomes stronger.

4. The higher the Marginal Propensity to Consume, the stronger fiscal policy would be.

5. Starting from a position of long-run equilibrium, if the demand for money increases, the economy will experience deflation before reaching long-run equilibrium.

6. If the economy is in a recessionary gap, and the price-adjustment mechanism has an expectation augmentation component, the economy will definitely overshoot the full-employment level of output during the transition period.

Paper For Above instruction

The evaluation of the given statements involves fundamental concepts in macroeconomic theory, particularly concerning the interactions between fiscal and monetary policies, money demand, interest rates, net exports, and expectations about price adjustments. Each statement presents a scenario based on economic principles, requiring careful analysis to determine its validity based on the relationships among these variables.

Statement 1: If money demand’s sensitivity to income increases, fiscal policy becomes weaker.

This statement pertains to the relationship between money demand and fiscal policy effectiveness. Money demand’s sensitivity to income, often represented by the income elasticity of money demand, affects how changes in income influence the demand for money. A higher sensitivity implies that when income rises, people demand significantly more money, which can lead to increased liquidity preference.

In the context of fiscal policy, which typically involves government spending and taxation, its effectiveness largely depends on the economy's response to aggregate demand shocks. When money demand is highly sensitive to income, expansionary fiscal policy might be less effective because increased income due to government spending could lead to a proportional increase in money demand, offsetting some of the stimulative effects. This increased money demand could dampen the expansionary impact of fiscal policy, thereby rendering it effectively weaker. Therefore, this statement is True: higher sensitivity of money demand to income can diminish fiscal policy's efficacy because of increased liquidity preference constraining the multiplier effects.

Statement 2: If investment’s sensitivity to the rate of interest decreases, monetary policy becomes stronger.

This statement examines the link between investment sensitivity to interest rates and the potency of monetary policy. Investment's responsiveness to interest rates is captured by the investment interest sensitivity coefficient. When this sensitivity decreases, a change in the interest rate leads to a smaller change in investment levels.

Monetary policy primarily influences the economy through the manipulation of interest rates. If investment becomes less sensitive to interest rate changes, then lowering interest rates will have a diminished impact on stimulating investment—a key component of aggregate demand. Conversely, if interest sensitivity increases, monetary policy becomes more effective because interest rate reductions significantly boost investment. Therefore, if sensitivity decreases, monetary policy's effectiveness diminishes, not strengthens. So, the statement is False: decreasing investment interest sensitivity weakens, rather than strengthens, monetary policy effectiveness.

Statement 3: If the net exports variable does not depend on income and interest rates, monetary policy becomes stronger.

This statement relates to the responsiveness of net exports to macroeconomic variables like income and interest rates. Net exports (NX) depend partly on domestic income (Y) and foreign interest rates; if they are insensitive to these factors, then the net exports component of aggregate demand is less affected by fiscal or monetary policy changes.

When net exports are independent of income and interest rates, the open economy version of the aggregate demand curve becomes less sensitive to these variables. In this context, monetary policy can be more effective because changes in interest rates or money supply will not be offset by changes in net exports, leading to a more straightforward transmission to output and prices. Therefore, the statement is True: if net exports do not depend on income or interest rates, monetary policy tends to be more potent in influencing aggregate demand and economic output.

Statement 4: The higher the Marginal Propensity to Consume, the stronger fiscal policy would be.

This statement concerns the multiplier effect in fiscal policy. The Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) measures the fraction of additional income that households spend on consumption. A higher MPC implies a larger multiplier effect because government spending or tax cuts will generate a more significant increase in aggregate demand.

In Keynesian economics, the fiscal multiplier is directly related to MPC: the larger the MPC, the greater the impact of fiscal measures on output. Consequently, fiscal policy is more effective—and thus 'stronger'—when MPC is high. Accordingly, the statement is True: higher MPC results in stronger fiscal policy effects due to a larger multiplier.

Statement 5: Starting from a position of long-run equilibrium, if the demand for money increases, the economy will experience deflation before reaching long-run equilibrium.

This statement involves the effects of an increase in money demand on the economy’s price level. Long-run equilibrium in macroeconomics assumes that all markets clear, and the economy operates at potential output with stable prices. An increase in the demand for money (liquidity preference) means individuals and businesses wish to hold more cash for transactions or precautionary reasons.

This increased demand for money, without a corresponding increase in money supply, tends to pull interest rates upward, which can contract economic activity, potentially leading to a fall in prices—or deflation—in the short run. Over time, prices adjust, and the economy returns to equilibrium. Hence, the statement is False: an increase in the demand for money does not necessarily cause deflation; it could lead to higher interest rates and reduced output, but the path depends on central bank responses and other factors. The economy might slow down, but not necessarily experience deflation before adjusting back to equilibrium.

Statement 6: If the economy is in a recessionary gap, and the price-adjustment mechanism has an expectation augmentation component, the economy will definitely overshoot the full-employment level of output during the transition period.

This statement addresses dynamic price-setting mechanisms with expectations influencing adjustment paths. In a recessionary gap, actual output is below potential, and an expectation augmentation component implies that price and wage adjustments are influenced by forward-looking expectations, often leading to more pronounced responses to economic shocks.

Expectations can amplify the speed and magnitude of adjustment processes. In such contexts, an overshoot of the full-employment level can occur if expectations cause prices and wages to adjust more rapidly than the economy can sustain at long-run equilibrium, potentially leading to temporary overshooting. Thus, in a model with an expectation augmentation component, the economy is very likely to overshoot during transition, making the statement True.

Conclusion

Understanding these relationships enhances comprehension of macroeconomic policy mechanisms. The accuracy of each statement hinges on correctly interpreting how variables such as money demand sensitivity, investment interest responsiveness, net exports dependency, MPC, money demand shocks, and expectations influence overall economic dynamics. Managers of fiscal and monetary policies must consider these factors for effective economic stabilization and growth strategies.

References

• Mankiw, N. G. (2018). Principles of Economics (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Blanchard, O. (2017). Macroeconomics (7th ed.). Pearson.
• Romer, D. (2019). Advanced Macroeconomics (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Friedman, M. (1956). The Quantity Theory of Money: A Restatement. In Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money. University of Chicago Press.
• Clarida, R., Galí, J., & Gertler, M. (2000). The Science of Monetary Policy: A New Keynesian Perspective. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(4), 1661–1707.
• Barro, R. J. (1981). Output Effects of Government Spending. Journal of Political Economy, 89(1), 108–118.
• Woodford, M. (2003). Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy. Princeton University Press.
• Shapiro, M. (2014). Macroeconomic Analysis (1st ed.). MIT Press.
• Krugman, P., & Obstfeld, M. (2018). International Economics (11th ed.). Pearson.
• Blanchard, O., & Johnson, D. R. (2013). Macroeconomics (6th ed.). Pearson.