Individual Assignments P 59 61 Merrill Lynch Case P 291

Individual Assignments1 P 59 61 Merrill Lynch Case2 P 291 Google

Individual Assignments 1. P 59-61. Merrill Lynch case 2. P 291- Google’s evolving pay strategy 3. Review Essay-paper on Reward management by Khan, S.A. Read the paper: Khan, SA (2000). Reward and Compensation Strategy: Issue and Challenges published in the journal, Management & Change, and write a review essay comprising of words. Review Essay: Critically evaluate the issues raised in the paper, and how far these issues are relevant for Saudi companies. Be comprehensive in your answer. There is no right and wrong answer but be logical and comprehensive in your answer.

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment involves three distinct tasks: analyzing the Merrill Lynch case as presented on pages 59-61, evaluating Google’s evolving pay strategy as detailed on page 291, and critically reviewing the paper by Khan (2000) on reward and compensation strategy, particularly its relevance to Saudi companies.

Firstly, the Merrill Lynch case provides insights into the strategic management of financial services, with emphasis on client relations, risk management, and organizational culture. Analyzing this case involves understanding how Merrill Lynch adapts its strategies to maintain competitive advantage in the dynamic financial sector. Key aspects include their approach to talent management, customer service, innovation, and risk mitigation, which collectively influence organizational success.

Secondly, Google’s evolving pay strategy reflects the company's approach to attracting, motivating, and retaining talent in the highly competitive tech industry. Google’s compensation policies have historically included competitive salaries, stock options, and innovative benefits like peer bonuses and wellness programs. The evolution of these strategies demonstrates Google's emphasis on aligning compensation with organizational culture, employee motivation, and continuous innovation. An examination of how Google adapts its compensation framework in response to market trends and internal needs provides valuable insights into strategic reward management in the tech sector.

Thirdly, the review of Khan’s (2000) paper requires a critical evaluation of the issues surrounding reward and compensation strategies, including their design, implementation, and impact on organizational performance. Key issues raised by Khan include aligning reward systems with organizational objectives, ensuring fairness and transparency, and addressing challenges posed by globalization and technological change. Additionally, the paper discusses the importance of adapting reward strategies to cultural contexts and organizational structures, which is particularly pertinent for multinational companies operating in diverse cultural environments.

Relating the insights from Khan’s paper to Saudi companies involves considering the unique cultural, economic, and regulatory context of Saudi Arabia. Saudi organizations are increasingly recognizing the importance of strategic reward systems to attract and retain skilled talent amid economic diversification efforts under Vision 2030. However, challenges such as cultural differences, reliance on expatriate labor, and regulatory frameworks influence how reward strategies are formulated and implemented.

In conclusion, the issues raised in Khan's paper are highly relevant for Saudi companies seeking to optimize their reward management systems. Effective reward strategies that are aligned with organizational goals, culturally adapted, and transparent can enhance employee motivation, organizational performance, and competitive advantage. As Saudi companies continue to evolve within a globalized economy, understanding and applying comprehensive reward and compensation strategies, as discussed by Khan, becomes increasingly critical for sustainable growth and development.

References

• Khan, S. A. (2000). Reward and Compensation Strategy: Issue and Challenges. Journal of Management & Change.
• Huselid, M. A. (1995). The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635-672.
• Milkovich, G. T., Newman, J. M., & Gerhart, B. (2014). Compensation. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (2017). Fundamentals of Human Resource Management. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Hayes, R. H., & Pisano, G. P. (1994). BeyondWorld Class: The New Manufacturing Strategy. Harvard Business Review, 72(1), 77-86.
• Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Balkin, D. B., & Cardy, R. L. (2016). Managing Human Resources. Pearson.
• Snape, E., Redman, T., & Bamber, G. (2016). Managing Employment Relations. Routledge.
• Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. (2016). Strategy and Human Resource Management. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Shapiro, C., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1984). Equilibrium Unemployment as a Worker Discipline Device. American Economic Review, 74(3), 433-444.
• AlFadhli, A., & Aljaaidi, K. (2022). Strategic HR practices and organizational performance: The case of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Business and Management, 24(1), 45-60.