Individual Project 1: Create A Force Field Analysis

Individual Project 1 Pagecreate A Force Field Analysis To Address The

Create a force-field analysis to address the leadership team's concerns about what else it should be doing and to what it has not yet paid enough attention. The analysis has been started below. HELPING FORCES HINDERING FORCES List here what will help the team address issues on which it has not yet put a priority focus. Consider how to include any item that needs to be addressed as an action that would be listed here. Leadership team effectiveness List here the problems it might need to address or the things that will cause the team to fail in making the change projects it has identified as working well. Any resistance factors from the organization or the board would need to go here. Please submit your assignment.

_________________________________________________________________________________

Discussion Board 4-6 paragraphs

This week, when you meet with your consulting partners, you want to evaluate the following issues: How much longer should you stay as primary consultant? You feel your effectiveness is waning because you have become too close to the group and have not addressed the connection of the board to the president. The team is becoming dependent on you. Which of the 4 change projects should the consulting group suggest helping the company design and develop? Which function can the company OD do better (as primary lead consultant) than an external group? Generate ideas about how you can move toward making the leadership team more independent. What would you have to see happen or what evidence would you look for to see that you can terminate your relationship with the team without any damage being done? Provide your thoughts about with which projects the consulting group should be involved. You know you could help with them all, but what is ethical? How much money and time can you, as consultants, lose or make based on this decision? What should drive the decision process?

Paper For Above instruction

The force-field analysis is a strategic tool used to evaluate the driving and restraining forces influencing organizational change. In the context of the leadership team's ongoing development and the consulting group's evolving role, this analysis provides insights into facilitating growth while addressing potential barriers. The primary driving forces include the team's desire to improve effectiveness, the recognition of unaddressed issues, and the commitment to ongoing improvement. Conversely, restraining forces encompass organizational resistance, dependency on external consultants, resistance from the board, and internal power dynamics that hinder autonomous functioning. Identifying these factors helps in designing strategic interventions that bolster aiding forces and mitigate hindering influences.

To enhance the leadership team's focus on neglected areas, the team must prioritize identifying specific issues that require attention and aligning their efforts with organizational goals. For example, emphasizing strategic planning, fostering leadership development at different levels, or improving communication channels could serve as critical focus areas. Facilitating internal capacity-building initiatives can empower the team to assume greater independence. Additionally, the team should work toward creating processes that diminish reliance on external consultants, such as implementing internal mentorship programs or establishing internal steering committees to oversee change initiatives.

Concurrently, the effectiveness of the management team must be monitored by detecting signs of dependency, such as over-reliance on external advice, lack of internal problem-solving capabilities, or diminished confidence among team members. Resistance factors from the organization, including potential pushback from the board or middle management, need to be carefully managed through transparent communication and stakeholder engagement. For sustainable change, the consulting group must delineate which projects are best suited for internal leadership versus external expertise, ensuring ethical considerations are prioritized. For instance, strategic change initiatives that involve sensitive organizational culture shifts could be better led internally, whereas technical or specialized projects might necessitate external support.

The decision on continuing as the primary consultant hinges on assessing the organization’s readiness and internal capacity to sustain initiatives independently. Evidence such as successful milestone achievements, internal ownership of projects, and demonstrated leadership capability should guide the termination of external involvement. Financially, prolonged engagement increases costs but can be justified if internal capacity is still developing; conversely, premature withdrawal risks losing momentum and destabilizing progress. The choice should be driven by a comprehensive evaluation of organizational resilience, resource availability, and the ethical implications of involvement. Ultimately, fostering leadership independence ensures sustainable growth, reducing dependency on external consultants and aligning with organizational self-sufficiency goals.

References

• Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2014). Organization Development and Change. Cengage Learning.
• Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational Leadership (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading Change. Harvard Business Review Press.
• French, W. L., & Bell, C. H. (1999). Organization Development: Behavioral Science Interventions for Organization Improvement. Pearson.
• Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership. Jossey-Bass.
• Schein, E. H. (2017). Organizational Culture and Leadership (5th ed.). Wiley.
• Van Wart, M. (2003). Public-sector leadership theory: An assessment. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 23(2), 9-28.
• Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), 1-47.
• Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice. Addison-Wesley.
• Heifetz, R. A., & Linsky, M. (2002). Leadership on the Line: Staying Alive through the Dangers of Leading. Harvard Business Review Press.