Information Technology Has Impacted Health Care Delivery

Information Technology Has Impacted Health Care Delivery In Many Ways

Information technology has significantly transformed healthcare delivery by enhancing the quality of patient care, reducing errors, and improving efficiency. The integration of systems such as electronic health records (EHRs), medication dispensing machines, laboratory informatics, and other digital tools has streamlined processes, minimized human error, and bolstered the overall safety and trustworthiness of medical services. Despite these advances, gaps remain that hinder optimal care, notably the absence of a comprehensive electronic patient health information system that grants patients direct access to their medical records.

Historically, medical errors caused by human factors—such as fatigue, miscommunication, or oversight—have contributed to adverse patient outcomes and even fatalities. Healthcare institutions have responded by adopting technology solutions to mitigate these errors. Technologies like the Pyxis medication dispensing system, Meditech electronic health records, and mobile laboratory systems exemplify how data-driven decision-making and automation can lead to safer, more accurate care (Nagle, Sermeus, & Junger, 2017). These systems enhance healthcare delivery by reducing medication mistakes, ensuring accurate documentation, and providing clinicians with reliable information at the point of care. Therefore, clinical workflows have become more efficient, safety has increased, and patient trust has been reinforced (Wakefield, 2008).

However, despite technological advancements, many healthcare facilities—my hospital included—lack a crucial tool: a comprehensive electronic patient health information system accessible to patients. Currently, patients often struggle to obtain their full medical records post-discharge, leading to delays averaging up to 14 days before they receive their information. Typically, hospitals provide only basic discharge summaries outlining their diagnosis and prescribed medications, which might not encompass a complete health history or detailed clinical data. Patients frequently face bureaucratic hurdles, including being referred to third-party organizations to access their medical records, which impairs transparency and patient engagement (Wakefield, 2008).

This gap contradicts the principles articulated by Mary Wakefield (2008), who emphasized that patients should be empowered and take an active role in managing their health information. When patients possess full control over their health data, they are better positioned to understand their medical conditions, make informed decisions, and coordinate care across multiple providers. The current disconnect diminishes this potential, underscoring the need for implementing robust electronic health information systems that prioritize patient access and data sharing.

The implications of integrating a comprehensive electronic health record system extend beyond convenience. It has the potential to improve care continuity, reduce redundant testing, lower overall healthcare costs, and foster a patient-centered approach. For instance, such a system would allow patients to access their medical history, recent tests, medication lists, and treatment plans in real time—empowering them to participate actively in their care and facilitating communication with healthcare providers (Nagle et al., 2017).

Addressing this challenge requires a multi-faceted approach involving data assessment, collection, and strategic implementation. First, healthcare institutions need to conduct comprehensive audits of existing documentation and data management practices to identify gaps and bottlenecks. Following assessment, data collection should prioritize standardizing health information formats to ensure interoperability among different systems and ease of access for patients (Wakefield, 2008). Implementing user-friendly portals and mobile applications can enhance patient engagement by providing timely, secure access to their health information.

Moreover, adopting secure, interoperable electronic health record systems aligns with the broader trend of connected healthcare, aiming for seamless data exchange across providers and institutions. Such integration necessitates investment in infrastructure, staff training, and policy development to address privacy and security concerns adequately. Emphasizing patient privacy, consent management, and data security is paramount to ensuring trust and compliance with regulations like HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) (Nagle et al., 2017).

In conclusion, while technology has advanced healthcare delivery by reducing errors and improving efficiency, significant gaps persist—particularly concerning patient access to their health records. Closing this gap by developing and implementing comprehensive electronic health information systems can fundamentally enhance patient empowerment, lead to better care outcomes, and uphold the principles of transparency and shared decision-making. Continuous efforts toward technological integration, coupled with policy support and stakeholder engagement, are essential to realize the full potential of health IT in transforming healthcare systems for the benefit of patients and providers alike.

References

• Nagle, L., Sermeus, W., & Junger, A. (2017). Evolving role of the nursing informatics specialist. In J. Murphy, W. Goossen, & P. Weber (Eds.), Forecasting Competencies for Nurses in the Future of Connected Health (pp. 212–221). IMIA and IOS Press.
• Wakefield, M. K. (2008). The Quality Chasm series: Implications for nursing. In R. G. Hughes (Ed.), Patient safety and quality: An evidence-based handbook for nurses (Vol. 1, pp. 47–66). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
• Adler-Milstein, J., & Jha, A. K. (2017). HITECH Act Drove Large Gains in Hospital Electronic Health Record Adoption. Health Affairs, 36(8), 1416–1422.
• Blumenthal, D., & Tavenner, M. (2010). The EHR Incentive Programs—Using Technology to Improve Care. New England Journal of Medicine, 363(16), 3–5.
• Chung, W., & Iranmanesh, M. (2020). Improving patient access with EHRs: Challenges and solutions. Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research, 4, 1–15.
• Herzlinger, R. (2006). Why innovation in healthcare is so difficult. Harvard Business Review, 84(5), 58–66.
• Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Data for Individualized Medicine. (2011). Toward Precision Medicine: Building a Knowledge Network for Biomedical Research and a New Taxonomy of Disease. National Academies Press.
• Kruse, C. S., et al. (2016). Barriers to Electronic Health Record Adoption: A Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Systems, 40, 1–9.
• Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC). (2019). Connecting Health and Care for the Nation: A 10-Year Vision to Achieve an Interoperable Health IT Infrastructure.
• Vest, J. R., & Gamm, L. D. (2010). Health information exchange: Persistent challenges and new strategies. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 17(3), 288–294.