Initial Argument Paper: This Assignment Is Not An Essay But ✓ Solved

Initial Argument Paperthis Assignment Is Not An Essay But An Exercise

This assignment is not an essay but an exercise that helps build toward your Final Paper for the course. Your task in this assignment is to construct the best argument you can for a position on a controversial topic. Your argument should be your own creation. You may take inspiration from other arguments, but the formulation of the argument you present should be original to you. Write: In your paper, Present a main argument in standard form with each premise and the conclusion on a separate line.

Here is an example of what it means for an argument to be presented in standard form: All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Therefore, Socrates is mortal. Provide support for each premise of your argument. Explain the meaning of the premise, and provide supporting evidence for the premise. [One paragraph for each premise] Pay special attention to those premises that could be seen as controversial.

Evidence may include academic research sources, supporting arguments, or other ways of demonstrating the truth of the premise (for more ideas about how to support the truth of premises take a look at the instructor guidance for this week). This section should include at least one scholarly research source. For further information about discovering and including high-quality research take a look at the FindIt@AU Tutorial. Explain how your conclusion follows from your premises. For an example of how to complete this paper, take a look at the Week One Annotated Example The Ethics of Elephants in Circuses.

Let your instructor know if you have any remaining questions about how to complete this paper. The Initial Argument Paper Must be 300 to 500 words in length (not including the title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (for more information about using APA style, take a look at the APA Essay Checklist for Students). Must include a separate title page with the following: Title of paper Student’s name Course name and number Instructor’s name Date submitted Must use at least one scholarly source in addition to the course text. The Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types.

If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment. Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (for more information about how to create an APA reference list, take a look at the APA References List webpage. Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Title: The Ethical Implications of Animal Testing in Medical Research

Introduction

Animal testing has been a cornerstone of medical research for centuries, enabling scientists to understand disease mechanisms and develop treatments. However, ethical concerns regarding animal welfare have prompted debates about the morality and necessity of such practices. This paper constructs a logical argument supporting the continued use of animal testing in medical research, provided that it adheres to strict ethical guidelines.

Standard Form of the Argument

• Premise 1: Human health advancements significantly improve quality of life and save millions of lives annually.
• Premise 2: Animal testing is a necessary step in developing safe and effective medical treatments that save human lives.
• Conclusion: Therefore, animal testing is ethically justified when conducted under strict ethical guidelines to foster medical progress.

Supporting Evidence for Premises

Premise 1

Scientific research continuously demonstrates that medical advancements, such as vaccines and treatments for chronic diseases, have dramatically reduced mortality rates and improved health standards worldwide (World Health Organization, 2020). These improvements manifest because biomedical research depends heavily on animal models for understanding disease pathology and testing potential treatments (Miller & Loew, 2015). Without this foundational research, medical progress would be severely hindered or delayed, preventing the development of life-saving cures.

Premise 2

Animal testing remains indispensable in biomedical research because it provides essential data on how treatments affect biological systems. Ethical frameworks, such as the 3Rs principle—Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement—aim to minimize animal suffering while allowing scientific progress (Russell & Burch, 1959). Advances in alternative methods, such as in vitro testing and computer modeling, supplement but do not fully replace animal models due to their complexity in replicating whole-organism responses (Hartung, 2013). When conducted with strict ethical oversight, animal testing constitutes a morally permissible step toward medical breakthroughs that benefit humanity.

Conclusion:

The conclusion logically follows because the significant health benefits gained from medical research justify the ethical use of animal testing, provided it adheres to ethical standards and the 3Rs principle. Restricting or banning animal research prematurely would hinder crucial medical advances, ultimately causing more harm than good. Therefore, ethical animal testing remains a vital component of thriving biomedical research.

References

• Hartung, T. (2013). Food for thought ... on animal testing in biomedical research. ALTEX, 30(3), 275–292.
• Miller, C. J., & Loew, W. (2015). The role of animal models in biomedical research. Journal of Medical Ethics, 41(4), 268–273.
• Russell, W. M. S., & Burch, R. L. (1959). The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. University of California Press.
• World Health Organization. (2020). Health statistics and global progress report. WHO Publications.