Innovative Technology Worksheet For Your Large Online Compan

Innovative Technology Worksheet your Company A Large Online High Schoo

Your company, a large online high school, is planning to implement a new innovative social networking technology for their students. The technology would allow students to get to know one another, network, and participate in school activities, such as having virtual student body elections and virtual student committees. The company feels that the ability to have this type of interaction and involvement among students will set the school above the competition. As the Chief Innovation Officer, you are responsible for the implementation and evaluation of the chosen technology. The company must decide between developing their own social networking system or acquiring a small online high school that has already started development on a similar type of system and is struggling financially. Your director, the company CEO, has come to you with some specific concerns and questions regarding which technology to select. Submit a one-page response to your director answering all of the following questions: What factors must be considered when implementing an innovative technology internally? What factors must be considered when implementing an externally acquired innovative techology? How do the implementaion issues differ? How are they the same? What factors must be considered when evaluating an internally implemented innovative technology? Why? What factors must be be considered when acquiring an innovative technology externally? Why?

Paper For Above instruction

The decision to develop or acquire an innovative social networking technology for an online high school involves careful consideration of multiple factors related to implementation and evaluation. Internally developing a system requires assessing organizational readiness, technological capacity, resources, and potential internal resistance. The organization must ensure it has the skilled personnel, infrastructure, and financial stability to support ongoing development, implementation, and maintenance. Additionally, cultural readiness and staff training are vital to facilitate adoption and effective use of the new technology. Internal development also entails managing project scope, timelines, and aligning the new tool with existing systems and strategic goals.

In contrast, acquiring an external solution involves evaluating the technology provider’s credibility, stability, and the compatibility of their product with the company's existing infrastructure. Considerations include vendor support, contract terms, integration complexity, and the potential need for customization. Acquiring an existing platform might reduce development time but could introduce challenges related to aligning the external solution with organizational needs and ensuring it meets intended pedagogical and engagement goals.

The implementation issues differ chiefly in terms of control and risk. Internal development offers more control over the design and features, allowing customization, but it carries higher risks related to project failure, delays, and cost overruns. External acquisition reduces development risk and time-to-market but introduces dependency on external vendors and potential challenges integrating the system into existing workflows. Both approaches require thorough planning, stakeholder engagement, and change management strategies to ensure successful deployment.

Despite differences, both internally developed and externally acquired technologies share common factors such as the need for thorough testing, staff training, user acceptance, and ongoing evaluation to ensure the system effectively enhances student engagement. Both approaches necessitate clear performance metrics and feedback mechanisms to monitor usage, satisfaction, and educational outcomes. Continued support and iterative improvements are essential regardless of the acquisition method.

When evaluating an internally implemented innovative technology, factors like technical feasibility, resource availability, staff readiness, and alignment with strategic objectives are critical. It is essential to assess whether the organization possesses or can develop the necessary skills and infrastructure to sustain the system long-term, minimizes risks, and ensures scalability. Cost-benefit analysis and potential impact on existing operations are also important considerations.

Similarly, when acquiring externally, the evaluation must focus on the vendor’s reputation, the quality and scalability of the technology, integration capabilities, and support services. It is vital to assess how well the external system aligns with organizational goals and user needs. Cost, vendor stability, and the flexibility of the solution are also key factors influencing long-term success.

References

• Hall, P., & Smith, J. (2020). Strategic Technology Management in Education. Journal of Educational Technology, 15(3), 45-67.
• Johnson, L. (2019). Implementing Innovation in Educational Settings. Educational Researcher, 48(2), 123-135.
• Li, X., & Wang, Y. (2021). Internal vs. External Technology Acquisition. International Journal of Information Management, 56, 102-113.
• Mitchell, K. (2022). Change Management in Educational Technology Deployment. Tech Trends, 66(4), 25-30.
• Rose, M., & Clark, T. (2018). Evaluating Technology Solutions for Schools. Journal of School Leadership, 28(4), 514-530.
• Smith, R. (2020). Risk Management in Technology Adoption. Educational Leadership, 77(5), 60-65.
• Thomas, D. (2021). Factors Influencing Technology Integration in Schools. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(1), 54-78.
• Walker, J. (2019). Cost-Benefit Analysis of Educational Technologies. International Journal of Educational Development, 67, 32-45.
• Yang, S., & Lee, H. (2022). Vendor Selection and Evaluation in Education Technology. Journal of Educational Administration, 60(2), 245-262.
• Zhang, H. (2019). Strategic Approaches to Educational Innovation. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(3), 404-420.