Instruction: You Need To Turn In A Brief Description

Instructionyou Need To Turn In One Brief Description Of The Assigned

You need to turn in one brief description of the assigned readings and an analysis of them. Your summary will be less than one page; the majority of the paper will focus on analyzing readings, comparing and contrasting readings, and adding in two additional scholarly sources to further develop your ideas on the given topic. The paper will be 4-5 pages long. Formatting: Century Font, 1.5 spacing, 1 inch margins, page numbers (lower right), APA citation style (no abstracts necessary unless otherwise instructed). Things to avoid: • Making a claim that is not substantiated by the evidence that you have reviewed in the paper; •Making over-the-top claims about how something will change the world we live in and people will live happily ever after (this is an academic piece of writing, not an editorial column in a newspaper; be objective and stick to the facts!) • Repeating word for word something you have already said; •avoid the phrase ‘further research should be carried out’ unless you have a specific idea what this research should be addressing.

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment requires a comprehensive analysis of assigned readings, emphasizing critical engagement over mere summaries. The purpose is to demonstrate an understanding of the key concepts and to develop an analytical perspective that compares and contrasts the readings, situating them within broader scholarly conversations. The brief summary, occupying less than one page, serves as an introduction to the analysis, providing context and identifying core themes. The main body, spanning four to five pages, should delve into an in-depth analysis, highlighting similarities, differences, strengths, weaknesses, and implications of the readings.

Incorporating two additional scholarly sources is essential to deepen the discussion, provide alternative viewpoints, or bolster arguments. The selected sources should be credible, peer-reviewed academic works relevant to the topic. Critical evaluation of these sources establishes a well-rounded understanding and demonstrates scholarly rigor. In comparative analysis, attention should be paid to conceptual frameworks, methodologies, and conclusions drawn by the authors, emphasizing how they inform or challenge each other.

Adherence to formatting standards is crucial—using Century font (which is likely a typo, and may refer to Century Gothic or Century Schoolbook), 1.5 line spacing, 1-inch margins, and page numbers in the lower right. APA style must be used for citations and references, with no abstracts unless specifically instructed otherwise. Clarity, coherence, and scholarly tone should underpin the writing, avoiding unsupported claims, exaggerations, repetition, and vague statements. Instead, arguments should be carefully substantiated with evidence from the readings and additional sources.

Overall, this assignment aims to demonstrate critical reading, analytical thinking, and scholarly writing skills. Focus should be on forming a nuanced understanding of the readings, articulating clear comparisons and contrasts, and situating the discussion within the broader academic discourse. Proper referencing and adherence to formatting guidelines will contribute to a polished and professional presentation.

References

  • Author, A. A. (Year). Title of the first scholarly source. Journal Name, volume(issue), pages. https://doi.org/xxxxx
  • Author, B. B. (Year). Title of the second scholarly source. Journal Name, volume(issue), pages. https://doi.org/xxxxx
  • Additional scholarly reference 1
  • Additional scholarly reference 2
  • Additional scholarly reference 3
  • Additional scholarly reference 4
  • Additional scholarly reference 5
  • Additional scholarly reference 6
  • Additional scholarly reference 7
  • Additional scholarly reference 8