Instructions For The Perspective Paper Format
Instructions For The Perspective Papergeneral Formatthe Paper Will Adh
Instructions for the Perspective Paper General Format The paper will adhere to current APA guidelines, which can be utilized by accessing and will include a title sheet and a reference page. The body of the paper, not counting the title or reference pages, will be a minimum of two full perspectives paper. This paper will include a personal commentary related to one of the four perspectives of psychology. These perspectives include the psychodynamic, behavioral, humanistic and biological approaches to understanding personality and psychological disorders. You should address the following questions in the body of your paper. · Identify which of the four perspectives you found most appealing in relation to your understanding of personality and give a very brief/basic overview of its main features. · Discuss why this perspective was most appealing to you. · Describe two of the strongest properties of the perspective that lead you to this decision. · Describe one problem area (limitation) that challenged your decision to choose this perspective.
Paper For Above instruction
The perspective I find most appealing in understanding personality and psychological disorders is the humanistic approach. This perspective emphasizes individual potential, self-actualization, and personal growth. It highlights the importance of understanding subjective experience and the inherent goodness of people, focusing on conscious thoughts and feelings rather than unconscious drives or external stimuli alone.
The humanistic perspective resonates with me because of its optimistic view of human nature and its focus on personal development. It encourages individuals to explore their unique qualities and aspirations, fostering a sense of empowerment and self-awareness. This approach aligns closely with my belief that people have the capacity for positive change and self-improvement, which I find inspiring and motivating.
Two of the strongest properties of the humanistic perspective that led me to favor it are its emphasis on empathy and the holistic view of human beings. The emphasis on empathy allows for a compassionate understanding of others, recognizing their subjective experiences without judgment. This fosters genuine interpersonal connections and enhances personal growth. Additionally, the holistic view considers the person as a whole—integrating emotions, thoughts, behaviors, and environment—rather than isolating specific traits or deficiencies. This comprehensive perspective makes it easier to appreciate the complexity of individual personalities and psychological well-being.
However, a notable limitation of the humanistic approach is its lack of empirical rigor and difficulty in scientific validation. Critics argue that concepts like self-actualization and personal growth are difficult to measure objectively, which raises questions about the scientific basis of this perspective. This limitation challenged my decision to fully endorse the humanistic approach, as it sometimes appears overly idealistic and less precise compared to other perspectives like the biological or behavioral models.
In conclusion, while the humanistic perspective offers an inspiring and compassionate understanding of personality, its limitations in scientific validation suggest the need for integration with other approaches. Nonetheless, its emphasis on human potential and subjective experience makes it a compelling framework for understanding personality and promoting psychological well-being.
References
American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). APA.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-396.
Rogers, C. R. (1951). Client-centered therapy: Its current practice, implications, and theory. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Schunk, D. H., DiBenedetto, M. K., & Meece, J. L. (2014). Motivation and learning: Theory, research, and practice. Pearson.
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity Synthesized. Thinking & Reasoning, 9(4), 353-367.
Kenrick, D. T., Griskevicius, V., Neuberg, S. L., & Schaller, M. (2010). Renovating the pyramid of motives: Classical motives and contemporary needs. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3), 292-314.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1982). Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. Jossey-Bass.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
Goldstein, E. B. (2018). Cognitive psychology: Connecting mind, research, and everyday experience. Cengage Learning.