Instructions In This Units Assignment You Will Continue Buil

Instructionsin This Units Assignment You Will Continue Building The

Instructionsin This units assignment, you will continue building the research plan you started to develop in Unit I. In a scholarly paper, you will plan your research to answer questions and/or solve problems by addressing the criteria below. First, you will design a hypothesis of what you believe will happen in terms of observed change if the study proceeds. Second, you will develop a null hypothesis that shows that nothing will change. Third, explain how and why your proposed study incorporates ethics. Finally, how do you expect a standard institutional review board to approve or ask for changes to your research proposal? Your scholarly activity must be at least two pages in length. It must be supported by the use of at least three sources.

Paper For Above instruction

The objective of this assignment is to develop a comprehensive research plan that addresses key components essential for conducting ethical and effective research. Building upon the groundwork laid in Unit I, this paper will articulate hypotheses, ethical considerations, and anticipate Institutional Review Board (IRB) feedback, demonstrating both scholarly rigor and practical understanding of research methodologies.

Formulating the Hypotheses

A vital preliminary step in research design involves formulating hypotheses that guide the investigation. The primary hypothesis (alternative hypothesis) reflects the researcher’s expectations regarding the relationship between variables and the expected change if the study proceeds. For instance, a researcher studying the impact of a new teaching method on student performance might hypothesize that "Implementing the new teaching method will lead to significantly improved test scores." This hypothesis presumes an observable change resulting from the intervention.

Complementing this, the null hypothesis asserts the absence of effect or change, serving as a baseline for statistical testing. Continuing the previous example, the null hypothesis would be "The new teaching method will have no effect on student test scores." Establishing both hypotheses is crucial for rigorous testing and for discerning whether observed effects are statistically significant or merely due to chance (Creswell, 2014).

Incorporating Ethical Considerations

Ethics is fundamental in research, ensuring respect for participant rights, beneficence, and justice. The proposed study will incorporate ethics by adhering to established guidelines such as obtaining informed consent, ensuring confidentiality, and minimizing potential harm. Participants will be fully informed about the purpose of the study, procedures involved, and their right to withdraw without penalty. Confidential data handling will protect participant identities, and any potential risks will be minimized and clearly communicated.

Furthermore, ethical approval will be sought from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), which assesses whether the study's design adequately protects participants. The researcher will also ensure equitable selection of participants to avoid bias and promote fairness. Incorporating ethics not only aligns with institutional requirements but also enhances the validity and credibility of the research (Resnik, 2018).

Anticipating IRB Review and Revisions

Prior to data collection, the study proposal will be submitted to an IRB for review. It is anticipated that the IRB will scrutinize the study for ethical compliance, particularly concerning informed consent procedures, confidentiality safeguards, and risk minimization strategies. The IRB may request modifications such as clearer consent forms, enhanced data security measures, or adjustments in participant recruitment methods to ensure equitable inclusion.

Given the importance of ethical compliance, the researcher will proactively address potential concerns by including comprehensive ethical protocols and contingency plans in the submission. The IRB might also require periodic monitoring or reporting during data collection to ensure ongoing adherence to ethical standards. Anticipating these reviews and incorporating feedback will facilitate a smoother approval process and reinforce the ethical integrity of the research (Hulley et al., 2013).

Conclusion

Developing a detailed research plan involving well-formulated hypotheses, a robust ethical framework, and an understanding of IRB review processes is essential for conducting responsible and impactful research. By clearly defining expected outcomes and ensuring adherence to ethical principles, researchers can contribute valuable insights while safeguarding participant welfare. The integration of these components demonstrates scholarly rigor and prepares the researcher for successful approval and implementation of the study.

References

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.

Hulley, S., Cummings, S., Browner, W., Grady, D., & Newman, T. (2013). Designing Clinical Research. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Resnik, D. B. (2018). The Ethics of Research with Human Subjects: Protecting Participants and Benefiting Society. Springer.

(Additional references would be included in an actual academic paper to meet the requirement of at least three sources, ideally recent and credible scholarly sources related to research methodology and ethics.)