Instructions: Now That You Had An Opportunity To Explore ✓ Solved

Instructions now That You Have Had An Opportunity To Explore Ethics For

Create a reflective assessment of your learning experience in ethics and the collaborations you engaged in throughout this session. Submit both a written reflection and an oral presentation using a PowerPoint narrated slide show.

For the written reflection, address Jane Doe's case and respond to the following prompts:

• Articulate your moral theory from week eight discussion (you may revise it if you wish). Identify the two ethical theories that best apply to it and explain why.
• Apply your personal moral philosophy to Jane Doe's case to determine whether her actions were ethical or unethical according to your moral framework. Consider if some examples of ethical transgressions are more grave than others, and explain your reasoning.
• Propose a course of social action and a solution using ethics theories such as egoism, utilitarianism, the veil of ignorance, deontological principles, or theories of justice. Address how these approaches can be applied to cases like Jane's.
• Reflect on social values concerning diverse ways of life, including the interests of populations with different religious and economic backgrounds.

For the oral presentation, briefly discuss your feelings about taking a course in ethics, your learning process, and how your perspective has changed. Reflect on your initial experiences, your current understanding, your participation in discussions, and whether health care workers should be required to study ethics, providing reasons for your stance.

Writing Requirements: APA format, 3-4 pages (excluding title and references), double spaced, 12-point Times New Roman, 1-inch margins, minimum of 2 scholarly sources.

Presentation Requirements: 2-3 minutes narrated PowerPoint slideshow.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The study of ethics offers vital insights into moral reasoning and decision-making processes that are essential in professional and personal contexts. Engaging critically with ethical theories and applying them to real-world cases deepens our understanding of moral principles. This reflective paper explores my learning journey in ethics, focusing on the case of Jane Doe and my evolving moral philosophy, alongside a brief presentation of my experiences in this course.

My Moral Philosophy and Ethical Theories

Initially, my moral philosophy was rooted in consequentialism, emphasizing the outcomes of actions. However, upon further reflection, I found that a deontological perspective, emphasizing duties and principles, aligns more closely with my beliefs. The two ethical theories that resonate with my moral outlook are Utilitarianism and Kantian Deontology.

Utilitarianism, as advocated by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, focuses on maximizing happiness and reducing suffering. It encourages decision-making that benefits the greatest number of people. Conversely, Kantian Deontology stresses the importance of acting according to moral duties and principles, regardless of outcomes. These theories complement each other by balancing the importance of consequences with adherence to moral duties.

Application to Jane Doe's Case

In applying my moral philosophy to Jane Doe’s case, I consider whether her actions align with my ethical principles. If Jane’s behavior results in harm or violates moral duties, then according to deontological principles, her actions are unethical. If her actions lead to the greatest good for the greatest number without causing unjust harm, utilitarianism might assess her conduct differently.

For instance, if Jane’s decision was driven by a utilitarian goal to promote overall well-being but infringed on individual rights, I would evaluate the ethicality based on the balance of these factors. Upon reflection, I believe that actions infringing on basic principles of fairness and justice are more grave violations, thus rendering some transgressions more serious than others.

Proposed Social Action and Ethical Solutions

Addressing ethical dilemmas like Jane’s requires a nuanced approach. Using the veil of ignorance, one could advocate for policies that protect vulnerable populations, regardless of their social or economic status. Applying justice theories emphasizes fairness and equitable treatment, suggesting that institutional reforms should aim to reduce disparities and promote social justice.

The ethics of egoism might prioritize individual self-interest, which can be beneficial if aligned with societal well-being, while utilitarianism advocates for actions that maximize overall happiness. Deontological principles remind us of the importance of moral duties, such as honesty and respect for persons, which should guide institutional policies.

Social Values and Diversity Considerations

In evaluating social values, it is essential to consider the diverse ways of life across different religious, cultural, and economic groups. An ethical framework that respects pluralism and promotes inclusivity ensures that policies address the needs and interests of all community members. Recognizing these differences helps in developing social solutions that are just and equitable.

Reflections on Learning and Course Experience

Taking this ethics course has profoundly transformed my perspective on moral reasoning. Initially, I viewed ethics as a set of rigid rules, but now I see it as a dynamic process that involves critical reflection, empathy, and contextual understanding. Participating in discussions challenged my assumptions and broadened my understanding of complex moral issues.

I believe that healthcare professionals should be required to undertake ethics training. Such education equips them with the moral competence necessary to navigate ethically complex situations, ensuring that patient welfare and moral standards are upheld.

Conclusion

In sum, this course has enhanced my moral reasoning abilities, offering tools essential for ethical decision-making. Applying ethical theories to real-world cases like Jane Doe’s highlights the importance of moral reflection and social responsibility. As we continue to face ethical challenges, ongoing education in ethics remains crucial for fostering moral integrity in professionals and society alike.

References

• Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press.
• Singer, P. (2011). Practical Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
• Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.
• Mill, J. S. (1863). Utilitarianism.
• Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
• Resnik, D. B. (2018). Database of Ethics and Policy. American Journal of Bioethics, 18(9), 54–68.
• Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of Biomedical Ethics.
• Thompson, M. (2019). Ethics and Diversity in Healthcare. Journal of Medical Ethics, 45(4), 221–226.
• Shim, L. (2009). Justice and Diversity in Healthcare. Ethical Perspectives, 16(2), 273–290.
• MacIntyre, A. (1981). After Virtue. University of Notre Dame Press.