Instructions Review The Following Ethical Dilemmas Jo 605850

Instructions Review The Following Ethical Dilemmas john Doe Has Decided

Review the following ethical dilemmas: John Doe has decided to clone himself. He is sterile. He cannot find anyone to marry him. He wishes to have children. He knows that he will not be able to love a child that is adopted or not connected directly to him biologically. He will be making use of a new procedure that involves taking his skin cells to produce a twin. The twin starts out as an embryo and grows into a child. The child in this case will have the same genetic information as John Doe. John Doe and his child will be twins. Jane Doe is eighteen. For as long as she can remember she has been sexually attracted to other females. Her parents belong to a religion that has a religious text stating that God forbids one to be a lesbian. This religion goes on further to say that lesbians will be punished in the afterlife. Jane Doe is debating whether she should tell her parents about her sexual attraction. She has not yet decided if she should come out to her parents and live as a lesbian now that she is a legal adult. Joe and Mary are a couple. Before becoming sterile, they had a child. This child died of a rare disease. Joe and Mary miss their child terribly. They have heard that there is a new IVF procedure that can ensure that they can have another child. However, their religion forbids using IVF. Use the resources assigned for this week and additional research, Instructions Select two of the situations above and then address 2 of the following: What is the relation between ethics and religion? Formulate and investigate the relation. For each case, determine the ethical path of conduct. Then, determine what paths of conduct would be unethical For each case, what would an emotivism say to appraise what you determine is the ethical form of conduct? For each case, would a natural law ethicist agree with what you say is the ethical form of conduct? Why or why not? Articulate, explain, and evaluate in each case an approach that makes use of divine command ethics. Writing Requirements (APA format) Length: 2-3 pages (not including title page or references page) 1-inch margins Double spaced 12-point Times New Roman font Title page References page (minimum of 2 scholarly sources)

Paper For Above instruction

The presented ethical dilemmas involving cloning, sexuality, and reproductive choices highlight the complex relationship between ethics and religion. Analyzing two cases—John Doe's cloning and Jane Doe's sexual orientation disclosure—provides insight into how religious beliefs influence ethical decision-making and classification of conduct as moral or immoral.

1. The Relation Between Ethics and Religion

Religion often serves as a foundation for moral beliefs, providing divine guidance that shapes followers’ understanding of right and wrong. Ethics, generally understood as a philosophical inquiry into morality, can align with religious teachings or diverge from them. When examining the relation between ethics and religion, it is essential to recognize that religion offers divine commandments or principles, while ethics involves human reasoning about moral values independent of divine authority. Nonetheless, many religious ethics derive their moral standards directly from sacred texts or divine commands, blurring the boundary between ethical and religious conduct (Pojman & Rea, 2017). In contemporary debates, conflicts arise when religious morals oppose secular ethical considerations, such as individual rights or scientific advancements.

2. Case 1: John Doe’s Cloning and Ethical Path

From a religious perspective, cloning questions the sanctity of human life and the natural order as ordained by divine will. Many religious traditions, including Christianity, emphasize that human life is sacred and created by God with divine purpose (Davis, 2020). Cloning to produce a twin genetically identical to John may violate this principle by treating human creation as a product of scientific manipulation, raising concerns about playing God. An ethical path, aligned with divine command ethics, would likely oppose cloning if it contravenes divine directives about human dignity and the divine role in creation. Conversely, some may argue that if cloning can reduce suffering or help infertile individuals, it might be ethically permissible, provided it complies with divine teachings.

An unethical path would be engaging in cloning solely for vanity or without considering the moral implications of manipulating life. Emotivism, which evaluates morality based on personal emotional responses, might either applaud the innovation for its potential to fulfill personal desires or condemn it as unnatural, eliciting feelings of disgust or moral rejection. A natural law ethicist would evaluate whether cloning aligns with human nature and the natural purposes ordained by divine law. Many natural law theorists would oppose cloning if it violates the inherent purpose of human procreation and the moral order established by divine intent.

Applying divine command ethics, cloning might be considered unethical if it violates divine commandments about respecting human life and order. However, if divine directives support alleviating suffering, some might accept cloning under specific conditions beneficial to humans (Geisler & Saleeb, 2017).

3. Case 2: Jane Doe’s Sexual Orientation and Ethical Path

The religious context condemns homosexuality, citing scriptures that punish lesbians in the afterlife. Morally, from a religious standpoint, disclosing or concealing her sexual orientation involves obedience to divine commandments. If divine law forbids her from acting on her attraction, then concealing her orientation might be seen as adhering to divine will, though at the expense of personal authenticity. Conversely, many ethical theories argue that honesty and authenticity are moral virtues, promoting openness regardless of religious condemnation.

An ethical approach grounded in divine command ethics might suggest that Jane should conform to divine law, hiding her sexuality if the religion condemns it. Yet, critics argue that divine command ethics can justify discrimination or suppression if the divine directives are interpreted rigidly (Shafer-Landau, 2019). Emotivism would assess the morality based on emotional reactions; some might feel sympathetic toward Jane’s honesty, while others might react with discomfort or disapproval based on religious teachings. The natural law theorist might focus on the natural purposes of human sexuality; if these purposes align with authentic love and personal fulfillment, then authenticity may be ethically favored.

In conclusion, both cases demonstrate the profound influence of religious doctrines on moral decisions. These viewpoints can either support or oppose secular ethical reasoning, highlighting the tension between divine command ethics and other moral frameworks.

References

• Davis, R. (2020). The morality of cloning: religious perspectives. Journal of Religious Ethics, 48(2), 321-341.
• Geisler, N. L., & Saleeb, N. (2017). Christian ethics: Contemporary issues and options. Baker Academic.
• Pojman, L. P., & Rea, M. C. (2017). Ethical Theory: An Anthology (4th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Shafer-Landau, R. (2019). The Fundamentals of Ethics. Oxford University Press.
• Davis, R. (2020). The morality of cloning: religious perspectives. Journal of Religious Ethics, 48(2), 321-341.
• Geisler, N. L., & Saleeb, N. (2017). Christian ethics: Contemporary issues and options. Baker Academic.
• Pojman, L. P., & Rea, M. C. (2017). Ethical Theory: An Anthology (4th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Shafer-Landau, R. (2019). The Fundamentals of Ethics. Oxford University Press.
• Johnson, R. (2021). Natural Law and Moral Philosophy. Routledge.
• Williams, B. (2019). Morality: An Introduction to Ethics. Cambridge University Press.