Instructions Review: The Rubric To Make Sure You Understand ✓ Solved

Instructions Review the Rubric To Make Sure You Understand The Criteria

Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade. With your team, create three tools: a survey, a set of interview questions, and a set of focus group questions. Questions can be similar or even the same across all three tools. You must use at least two of the tools in your audit. Develop two versions of each tool: a "clean copy" version that you can use with your business/organization, and an annotated version that explains the rationale for the questions. This means providing a reason for why you are including that question, based on the communication principles learned in this course. Provide citations and references appropriately. By the end of the workshop, finalize the three research tools and post them as attachments in the discussion accessible to the whole team. Each team member must acknowledge consensus on the tools within the discussion board. If any team member does not participate, the others can proceed with what was collaboratively created.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The process of developing research tools such as surveys, interview questions, and focus group questions is essential for effective organizational communication audits. Understanding the criteria for creating these tools, as outlined in the assignment instructions, directly aligns with principles of strategic communication, ensuring that data collection methods are both reliable and valid in capturing stakeholder insights. This paper discusses the steps involved in creating these tools, emphasizing the importance of dual versions—one practical, and one annotated with rationale—based on communication principles and supported by scholarly references.

Creating the Research Tools

Working collaboratively in a team setting, students are tasked with developing three primary research tools: a survey, interview questions, and focus group questions. These tools serve as instruments for gathering qualitative and quantitative data to evaluate communication effectiveness within an organization. The assignment requires that questions across these tools may be similar or even identical, allowing for triangulation and richer data collection. This approach adheres to best practices in communication research, enhancing the breadth and depth of insights gained.

Each tool must be developed in two formats: a “clean copy” and an “annotated version.” The clean copy functions as the final instrument to be used in research, designed to be clear, concise, and user-friendly. The annotated version explains the rationale behind each question, integrating communication principles learned during the course. This rationale supports the validity and reliability of the tool by ensuring that each question aligns with specific communication objectives, such as clarity, relevance, and stakeholder engagement (Corcoran, 2019).

For example, in designing survey questions, the team should consider principles such as simplicity, neutrality, and directness to minimize bias and enhance comprehensibility. Each question’s annotation should articulate these considerations and cite relevant communication frameworks or research (e.g., Shannon & Weaver, 1949; McLuhan, 1964). The rationale might specify that a particular question aims to assess stakeholder perceptions of clarity in organizational messaging, justified by communication theory emphasizing message comprehension.

Finalizing the Tools and Ensuring Consensus

By the conclusion of the workshop, the team must finalize all three research tools—survey, interview questions, and focus group questions. These should be compiled, formatted, and posted as attachments in the discussion forum, accessible to all team members. Additionally, every team member needs to acknowledge the consensus on these tools within the discussion board, ensuring collective agreement and clarity on the data collection instruments used. This process not only reinforces collaborative learning but also adheres to ethical research practices, providing transparency and shared ownership (Patton, 2015).

If any team member fails to participate, the remaining members are empowered to proceed with the collaboratively developed tools, maintaining momentum and ensuring the project’s completion. This approach emphasizes accountability and teamwork essential for professional communication and research projects.

Conclusion

In summary, developing and validating research tools within a team requires an understanding of communication principles, collaborative effort, and adherence to ethical standards. The dual-version approach—clean and annotated—enhances both usability and transparency, fostering a shared understanding of the rationale behind each question. By carefully applying scholarly principles and ensuring consensus, teams can produce effective tools for organizational communication audits that yield meaningful insights and support strategic improvements.

References

• Corcoran, P. (2019). Communication Principles in Research Methodology. Journal of Organizational Communication, 12(3), 45-59.
• McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. McGraw-Hill.
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Sage Publications.
• Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press.