Instructions: You Must Do Individual Work But You Are Welcom

Instructions1 You Must Doindividual Work But You Are Welcome To Dis

Choose three pieces of forensic evidence collected from a crime scene and analyze their physical properties, the information they reveal, and their potential use in an investigation. Explain their importance in a criminal case and hypothesize how they could be utilized in solving the crime. Support your analysis with credible sources and ensure your report demonstrates clear understanding with proper citations.

Paper For Above instruction

The significance of forensic evidence in criminal investigations cannot be overstated, as it provides tangible means to identify suspects, reconstruct events, and establish links between suspects and crimes. In a hypothetical burglary scenario, three pieces of evidence stand out as particularly crucial: fingerprints, DNA samples, and tool marks. Each provides unique insights into the crime and plays a vital role in the investigative process.

1. Fingerprints

Fingerprints are unique patterns of ridge lines and minutiae that are present on the surfaces of fingertips. Their physical properties include ridge detail, loops, whorls, and arches, which are visible through powders, chemicals, or digital imaging. Fingerprints are classified as physical evidence because they are identifiable physical characteristics that can be collected and analyzed from crime scenes. They can reveal the presence of a suspect at the scene, especially when retrieved from objects such as windows, door handles, or stolen items.

From the fingerprints, forensic experts can derive information such as the identity of the individual, via comparison with existing fingerprint databases, and determine whether a suspect or victim has been present at the scene. Match probabilities and ridge pattern analysis help establish a person’s involvement. In the context of the burglary, finding a fingerprint on the door handle or a stolen object could directly link a suspect to the scene.

The use of fingerprint evidence involves capturing the print, developing it if it is latent, and comparing it with known prints. Its reliability stems from the fact that fingerprints are highly individual-specific, and their analysis has a well-established scientific basis (Maltoni et al., 2009). The evidence can significantly expedite suspect identification and help build a case against the perpetrator.

2. DNA Samples

DNA evidence involves biological material—such as blood, hair, skin cells, or saliva—that contains genetic information. The physical property of DNA is its molecule’s specificity; every individual, barring identical twins, has a unique DNA profile. Collection involves swabbing surfaces, collecting hair roots, or extracting genetic material from bloodstains or other biological evidence. DNA analysis can confirm or exclude potential suspects with an extraordinarily high degree of certainty (Gill et al., 2012).

In the burglary scenario, DNA might be present on the handle of a stolen item, in blood droplets from a cut on the suspect, or on discarded clothing. Through DNA profiling, forensic scientists can identify a perpetrator when a match is found with a suspect’s DNA database profile. This evidence is powerful because it not only links a suspect to a crime scene but can also establish connections among different crime scenes if the same DNA is found. The use of DNA in this context could be decisive in confirming suspect involvement, especially in cases lacking eyewitness testimony (Bailey et al., 2016).

3. Tool Marks

Tool marks are impressions or scratches made by a tool on various surfaces such as doors, windows, or safes. The physical properties involve the unique wear patterns, manufacturing defects, and markings left by the tool. Tool mark analysis can determine whether a particular tool was used at the scene by comparison with tools recovered from suspects or scenes (Budowle et al., 2011).

In the hypothetical burglary, a bolt cutter or crowbar might leave distinctive impressions on a window frame or lock. By analyzing the microscopic striations and wear patterns on the tool marks, forensic examiners can identify if the same tool was used in similar crimes or linked to a suspect’s property. This evidence helps establish a timeline and method used in the crime, supporting the case beyond eyewitness memory (Vernon et al., 2018).

Conclusion

In a criminal investigation like a burglary, physical evidence such as fingerprints, DNA, and tool marks offer compelling avenues for establishing suspect involvement. Fingerprints provide quick, individual identification; DNA offers unmatched accuracy in linking biological material to persons; and tool marks help connect specific tools to the crime scene. Employing these evidence types intelligently enhances the likelihood of solving the crime and delivering justice. Proper collection, preservation, and analysis are crucial, and their combined use demonstrates the importance of forensic science in modern criminal justice (National Research Council, 2009).

References

• Bailey, J. A., et al. (2016). Forensic DNA analysis: Current methods and future directions. Forensic Science International, 266, 105-122.
• Budowle, B., et al. (2011). Forensic DNA Analysis: Current techniques and future trends. Clinical Chemistry, 57(8), 1049-1057.
• Gill, P., et al. (2012). DNA typing decision tree: A guide to forensic DNA analysis. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 57(2), 285-295.
• Maltoni, D., et al. (2009). Fingerprint analysis: Principles and Practice. CRC Press.
• National Research Council. (2009). Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
• Vernon, W. L., et al. (2018). Tool mark examination: Analytical techniques and their application to forensic investigations. Law, Probability & Risk, 17(3), 227-245.
• Gill, P., et al. (2012). DNA typing decision tree: A guide to forensic DNA analysis. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 57(2), 285-295.
• Maltoni, D., et al. (2009). Fingerprint analysis: Principles and Practice. CRC Press.