International Business Module 6 Journal: Acquisition Vs. All ✓ Solved

International Business Module 6 Journal: Acquisition vs. Alliance

In this journal entry, you will consider under what conditions you would choose an acquisition over an alliance, and vice versa, if you were a part of a firm’s leadership team. To successfully complete this journal, be sure to address the following: Analyze which characteristics of alliances are advantageous and under what conditions. Analyze which characteristics of acquisitions are advantageous and under what conditions.

Paper For Above Instructions

In the realm of international business, firms often find themselves weighing the strategic advantages of mergers and acquisitions against those of alliances. This decision-making process is critical, as it can dictate the firm's growth trajectory, competitive position, and overall success in the marketplace. The analysis of the characteristics of alliances and acquisitions reveals distinct scenarios in which each might be favored by a firm's leadership team.

Characteristics of Alliances

Alliances, typically structured as partnerships or joint ventures, offer several advantageous characteristics for businesses, particularly in dynamic or uncertain environments. One of the main benefits is the flexibility that alliances provide. Companies can collaborate on specific projects or in certain markets without the hefty financial commitments entailed in an acquisition. This flexibility is particularly advantageous when entering new geographical markets or when exploring innovative technologies. For instance, technology firms often enter alliances to co-develop new products while sharing the associated risks and costs (Dyer & Singh, 1998).

Moreover, alliances allow companies to leverage complementary resources and capabilities. By teaming up, firms can pool their resources, such as expertise, market access, and distribution networks, thereby creating a synergy that would be challenging to achieve independently (Gulati, 1998). This characteristic is particularly beneficial for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) looking to enhance their competitive edge without overwhelming their financial and operational capacities.

Conditions Favoring Alliances

Specific conditions make alliances particularly fruitful. When firms seek to enter a highly regulated market, for example, local partnerships can help navigate governance complexities and cultural nuances. Additionally, in industries marked by rapid technological advancements, such as biotechnology and software, forming alliances allows companies to stay abreast of innovation without solely bearing the burden of research and development costs (Alvarez & Barney, 2001). Thus, alliances can be advantageous when firms desire strategic agility, reduced risk, and access to different capabilities.

Characteristics of Acquisitions

Conversely, acquisitions can present distinct advantages, particularly in situations that call for substantial market control or rapid growth. The primary benefit of an acquisition lies in the immediate control it grants over the acquired entity’s resources, capabilities, and market presence (Coff, 2002). For instance, a large corporation may choose to acquire a smaller company to gain its innovative technology, valuable patents, or skilled workforce. This characteristic can significantly reduce competition and open new markets, often leading to enhanced profitability.

Another compelling reason to pursue an acquisition is the potential for cost synergies. By integrating operations, companies can streamline processes, reduce redundancies, and achieve economies of scale that would be more challenging to realize through collaborative agreements (Koller, Goedhart, & Wessels, 2015). This strategic consolidation can lead to increased efficiency and substantial long-term financial benefits for the acquiring firm, which is particularly appealing for large corporations with robust capital reserves.

Conditions Favoring Acquisitions

Acquisitions tend to be favored under specific conditions, such as when a firm possesses sufficient resources to absorb the acquired company's operations without jeopardizing its financial health. Additionally, in industries facing significant consolidation pressure—such as telecommunications or pharmaceuticals—acquisitions allow firms to quickly enhance their competitive positions, gain market share, and eliminate competitors (Baker & McKenzie, 2017). Consequently, the choice to pursue an acquisition is often driven by the immediate need for aggressive growth and dominant market positioning.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both alliances and acquisitions present unique advantages under varying circumstances. Alliances are beneficial for firms seeking flexibility, risk-sharing, and the pooling of complementary resources, especially in new market entries and rapidly evolving industries. In contrast, acquisitions offer immediate control, competitive security, and operational efficiencies for companies looking to expand swiftly and assertively within their markets. As such, the decision between pursuing an alliance or an acquisition should be carefully considered based on a firm’s strategic objectives, market conditions, and resource availability.

References

  • Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2001). How Entrepreneurial Firms Can Benefit from Alliances with Larger Firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(2), 73-95.
  • Baker, M., & McKenzie. (2017). Global Mergers and Acquisitions: A Compendium of Best Practices. New York: Baker McKenzie Publishers.
  • Coff, R. W. (2002). Human Capital, Shared Expertise, and Capability Enhancement. Journal of Management, 28(6), 853-872.
  • Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679.
  • Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and Networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 293-317.
  • Koller, T., Goedhart, M., & Wessels, D. (2015). Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies. New York: McKinsey & Company Inc.
  • Perry, M. (2016). The Case for Strategic Alliances vs. Mergers and Acquisitions. Journal of Business Strategy, 37(2), 25-32.
  • Shankar, R., & Lee, K. (2020). Comparative Benefits of Mergers and Alliances in Technology Development. Research Policy, 49(8), 104036.
  • Smith, K. G., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Generation of Innovation and R&D Strategies in the Semiconductor Industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26(13), 1241-1259.
  • Vernon, R. (1971). Sovereignty at Bay: The Multinational Spread of U.S. Enterprises. Harvard University Press.

Related Assignments