Introduction For This Week's Discussion: Question 1 123967

Introductionfor This Weeks Discussion I Chose Question 1 To Answer T

Introductionfor This Weeks Discussion I Chose Question 1 To Answer T

Introduction for this week’s discussion I chose question 1 to answer. The question asks to describe the 4 levels of evaluation that make up Kirkpatrick’s framework of evaluation. Identify one example of data at each level that might be collected to provide evidence for the effectiveness of a class or training program in which you have participated.

Four levels of evaluation

The four levels that make up Kirkpatrick’s framework of evaluation are reaction (level 1), learning (level 2), behavior (level 3), and results (level 4). Kirkpatrick's framework offers a concise method to consider the potential effects of training and serves as a reminder that workplace learning initiatives frequently include a number of goals (Werner, 2022).

The reaction level primarily assesses the trainees' opinions of the program and its efficacy. This level’s limitations include its inability to determine if the program achieved its broader goals beyond participant satisfaction. For example, in the military, training sessions often involve conducting an after-action review (AAR), where trainees provide feedback on strengths and weaknesses of the training conducted.

The next level, the learning level, measures whether trainees mastered the material aligned with the specified learning objectives. This level could involve assessments such as quizzes or exams to evaluate knowledge acquisition. In most of my training experiences, I encountered some form of a check on learning, often through quizzes or tests.

The third level, behavior, indicates if trainees apply what they have learned in their work. This is a crucial success indicator. Often, this is evaluated by whether a trainee can teach or train others on what they have learned. For instance, during my early military career, my supervisor trained me on specific tasks and then delegated training duties over my peers, demonstrating application of the learned skills.

The final level, results, assesses organizational outcomes derived from the learning initiatives. This might include customer feedback or achievement of organizational objectives. Kirkpatrick’s evaluation model thus provides a structured approach to organizing and analyzing data related to training effectiveness (Campbell et al., 2019).

In terms of applying the biblical perspective, 2 Corinthians 13:5 (English Standard Version Bible, 2023) emphasizes the importance of self-examination—"Examine yourselves, to see whether you are in the faith." This principle mirrors workplace evaluation processes, encouraging reflection on one's effectiveness and alignment with goals. Just as organizations evaluate training to improve performance, individuals are called to self-assess to grow spiritually and morally.

References

  • Campbell, K., Taylor, V., & Douglas, S. (2019). Effectiveness of online cancer education for nurses and allied health professionals; a systematic review using Kirkpatrick evaluation framework. Journal of Cancer Education, 34(2).
  • English Standard Version Bible. (2023).
  • Werner, J. (2022). Human Resource Development: Talent Development (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.