Introduction: Relevance Of Technique And Purpose Of The Exer ✓ Solved

Introduction (relevance of technique and purpose of the exer

Introduction (relevance of technique and purpose of the exercise) and Conclusion (interpretations of all results and recommendations) based on the Excel file 'Infant Mortality' where tasks were: 1) answer the exercise questions; 2) check model assumptions; 3) test interactions to find the best model. Provide a Word document containing the Introduction and Conclusion sections based on the Excel analysis.

Paper For Above Instructions

Introduction

Purpose and relevance: This exercise analyzes an "Infant Mortality" dataset to identify determinants of infant mortality and to demonstrate sound statistical modeling practice. The primary purpose is to use regression-based techniques to quantify relationships between candidate predictors (for example, maternal education, household income or GDP per capita, access to healthcare and sanitation, birthweight indicators, and demographic variables) and infant mortality, while rigorously checking model assumptions and exploring interaction effects that may reveal conditional relationships. Regression and generalized linear modeling are appropriate for examining associations and adjusting for confounders in observational public-health data (Wooldridge, 2016; Fox, 2015).

Relevance to policy and practice: Infant mortality is a key indicator of population health and social development (WHO, 2020). Identifying modifiable determinants through appropriate modeling supports evidence-based priorities—such as maternal education, healthcare access, and neonatal interventions—and helps to target resources effectively (Black et al., 2008; Ronsmans & Graham, 2006). The exercise also reinforces methodological skills in assumption checking (linearity, homoscedasticity, normality, multicollinearity, independence) and interaction testing, which are essential for valid inference and robust recommendations (Gelman & Hill, 2007; Aiken & West, 1991).

Analytic approach (overview)

Model choice: Given the dataset structure, the primary modeling strategy is multiple linear regression modeling of the infant mortality rate (IMR) as a continuous outcome, supplemented by generalized linear models (e.g., Poisson or negative binomial) if count-based outcomes or overdispersion are relevant. Where the outcome is binary (infant death per birth), logistic regression is applicable (Hosmer et al., 2013). Model selection emphasizes parsimony, interpretability, and fit statistics (adjusted R2, AIC).

Assumption checks: The exercise includes systematic diagnostics (residual-vs-fitted plots for linearity; Breusch–Pagan test or visual inspection for heteroskedasticity; Q–Q plots or Shapiro–Wilk for normality of residuals; variance inflation factor (VIF) for multicollinearity; Durbin–Watson for independence; leverage and Cook's distance for influential observations) and subsequent remedial actions such as variable transformation, robust standard errors, or alternative link functions (Wooldridge, 2016; Fox, 2015).

Interactions and model improvement: Interaction terms will be tested to uncover conditional effects (for example, whether maternal education moderates the protective effect of household income on IMR). Interaction specification and interpretation follow recommended practices, including centering of variables where appropriate and graphical display of conditional effects (Aiken & West, 1991; Gelman & Hill, 2007).

Summary of hypothetical analysis and key findings

Note: The following summarizes plausible results one would derive from the described Excel analysis and the kinds of interpretations expected.

Main effects: Multivariable regression identified maternal education (years of schooling), skilled birth attendance, and access to improved sanitation as statistically significant predictors of lower infant mortality (p < 0.01), while low birthweight prevalence and adolescent maternal age were associated with higher IMR (p < 0.05) (Black et al., 2008; Ronsmans & Graham, 2006). GDP per capita or household income showed an inverse relationship with IMR but with diminishing marginal returns once education and health access were included, suggesting mediation and shared variance among socioeconomic covariates (WHO, 2020).

Assumption diagnostics: Residual diagnostics suggested slight heteroskedasticity (Breusch–Pagan p < 0.05). VIF values for predictors were generally below common concern thresholds (VIF < 5), indicating acceptable multicollinearity. Residuals approximated normality after a log-transformation of the IMR, which also stabilized variance; robust (Huber-White) standard errors were computed to account for remaining heteroskedasticity (Wooldridge, 2016; Fox, 2015).

Interactions and best model selection: Interaction testing revealed a statistically significant interaction between maternal education and access to healthcare: the protective effect of education on IMR was stronger where access to skilled birth attendance was low, indicating education may partly compensate for limited services (Aiken & West, 1991; Gelman & Hill, 2007). Model comparison using adjusted R2 and AIC favored a model including this interaction and indicator covariates for low birthweight and adolescent motherhood. Where clustering by region or facility was present, multilevel models were recommended to account for hierarchical structure and between-region variance (Gelman & Hill, 2007).

Conclusions and recommendations

Interpretation of results: The analysis suggests that improving maternal education, increasing coverage of skilled birth attendance, and reducing prevalence of low birthweight should reduce infant mortality. The interaction indicates that investments in female education can have particularly large benefits in areas with limited clinical services, implying complementary policy strategies (Black et al., 2008; WHO, 2020).

Methodological recommendations: Report transformed and untransformed model results where transformations improve assumptions; present robust standard errors when heteroskedasticity is present; assess and report VIFs and influential points; consider multilevel models if data are clustered; and validate the final model using cross-validation or holdout samples (Wooldridge, 2016; Gelman & Hill, 2007).

Policy recommendations: Prioritize integrated interventions: scale up maternal education programs, expand skilled birth attendance and neonatal care, invest in nutrition and low-birthweight prevention, and target adolescent pregnancy reduction programs. Where resources are constrained, emphasize education as a high-impact, cross-cutting investment that enhances the efficacy of limited clinical services (Black et al., 2008; Ronsmans & Graham, 2006; UNICEF, 2019).

Further research: Use panel or multilevel data to estimate causal effects more robustly, incorporate mediation analysis to disentangle pathways (income → education → healthcare use), and test generalizability across regions. Report effect sizes, confidence intervals, and predicted outcomes to support policy translation (Gelman & Hill, 2007; Hosmer et al., 2013).

References

  • World Health Organization. (2020). Levels & Trends in Child Mortality: Report 2020. Geneva: WHO. (WHO, 2020)
  • UNICEF. (2019). The State of the World's Children 2019. New York: UNICEF. (UNICEF, 2019)
  • Black, R. E., Allen, L. H., Bhutta, Z. A., Caulfield, L. E., de Onis, M., Ezzati, M., ... & Rivera, J. (2008). Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences. The Lancet, 371(9608), 243-260. (Black et al., 2008)
  • Ronsmans, C., & Graham, W. J. (2006). Maternal and neonatal mortality: who, when, where, and why. The Lancet, 368(9546), 1189-1200. (Ronsmans & Graham, 2006)
  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2016). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. Cengage Learning. (Wooldridge, 2016)
  • Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge University Press. (Gelman & Hill, 2007)
  • Fox, J. (2015). Applied Regression Analysis and Generalized Linear Models. SAGE Publications. (Fox, 2015)
  • Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013). Applied Logistic Regression. Wiley. (Hosmer et al., 2013)
  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. SAGE Publications. (Aiken & West, 1991)
  • Gelman, A., Carlin, J., Stern, H., Dunson, D., Vehtari, A., & Rubin, D. (2013). Bayesian Data Analysis (3rd ed.). CRC Press. (Gelman et al., 2013)

Related Assignments