Introduction: You Should Consider The Discussion Threads As

Introductionyou Should Consider The Discussion Threads As Being Analog

Introduction you should consider the discussion threads as being analogous to the kind of discussions you would have in a face-to-face class: our goals should be to say things that are interesting, provocative, and respectful. Since this is a classroom setting, you are encouraged to proofread, and to avoid the more slang- and emoticon-fueled discourse that appears on Twitter and Facebook. One of the goals here is professional preparation; if you would not say or do something in the workplace, then you should not post similar material in a discussion thread. You can post more than twice to the postings of your peers; the two longest postings are the ones that will be evaluated. Where possible, the threads will cover supplemental material incorporated into each chapter, via videos related to the supporting discussion integrated into your textbook chapters.

Postings should not merely summarize the material, but should deal with how to apply the material in practice. Directions The posting should consist of no less than 250 words and should incorporate at least one outside, i.e., from a library database search, APA formatted reference at the end of the post. After posting your answers, begin making two (2) or more replies to other students' posts. Your responses should ask a pertinent question, contribute significantly to your classmate’s posting and foster further discussion in order to receive the full points per response (up to 2 responses). Response postings have the same requirements for length and outside references as original postings. To make a knowledgeable posting, it would be a good idea to review the supplemental material before writing your response. Review the grading rubric before beginning this assignment. Questions INDICATE, BY NUMBER, WHICH QUESTION YOU ARE RESPONDING TO WHEN MAKING YOUR POSTS. What is the current state of communication in your organization? How can it be improved? What is your sense of others’ willingness to support change efforts for improvement in your organization? Why do you believe as you do?

Paper For Above instruction

Effective communication within an organization is fundamental to operational success and organizational growth. Currently, many organizations struggle with communication inefficiencies, characterized by information silos, lack of transparency, and inconsistent messaging. Recognizing these issues is the first step toward implementing effective strategies for improvement. In my organization, communication is often reactive rather than proactive, leading to misunderstandings and delays in decision-making. To address these challenges, adopting a more open and transparent communication culture is crucial. This can be facilitated through the integration of modern communication tools such as collaborative platforms, regular update meetings, and feedback loops that encourage employee participation. Moreover, leadership must model clear and consistent messaging to foster a culture of openness and trust.

Supporting organizational change efforts relies heavily on employees' willingness and perceived support from leadership. In my experience, many colleagues are supportive of initiatives aimed at improving communication, provided they understand the benefits and see genuine commitment from management. Resistance often stems from fear of change, perceived additional workload, or skepticism about the sustainability of new initiatives. To enhance support, leaders need to communicate the purpose, expected outcomes, and involve staff in the planning and implementation phases. This participatory approach fosters ownership and reduces resistance.

Improving communication in organizations also involves continual assessment and adaptation. Regular feedback mechanisms, such as surveys and focus groups, can help identify ongoing issues and refine strategies accordingly. Furthermore, developing a learning organization that values transparency, accountability, and continuous improvement can significantly enhance communication effectiveness. As organizations evolve, so should their communication practices to ensure alignment with strategic goals and foster a culture of collaboration and trust.

References

• Hargie, O. (2011). Skilled Interpersonal Communication: Research, Theory and Practice. Routledge.
• Tourish, D., & Robson, P. (2006). Narrative, charisma, and organisational change: the case of John Prescot and RSI. Leadership, 2(2), 223-245.
• Komives, S. R., Lucas, N., & McMahon, T. R. (2013). Exploring Leadership: Principles and Practice. John Wiley & Sons.
• Robinson, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational Behavior. Pearson.
• Roberts, K. H. (2004). Managing high reliability organizations.afety Science, 44(1), 89-94.
• Harper, S. (2014). Improving Organizational Communication: Strategies, Models, and Approaches. Routledge.
• Clampitt, P. G., & DeKoch, R. J. (2016). The Responsible Communication of Change in Organizations. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Men, L. R. (2014). Strategic internal communication: Transformational leadership, communication climates, and employee engagement. Journal of Communication Management, 18(2), 135-149.
• Tourish, D. (2013). The Dark Side of Transformational Leadership: A Critical Perspective. Routledge.
• Bailey, C., & Phillips, R. (2010). Managing Change: Cases and Concepts. Routledge.