Introduction You Should Consider The Discussion Threads As B

Introductionyou Should Consider The Discussion Threads As Being Analog

Introduction you should consider the discussion threads as being analogous to the kind of discussions you would have in a face-to-face class: our goals should be to say things that are interesting, provocative, and respectful. Since this is a classroom setting, you are encouraged to proofread, and to avoid the more slang- and emoticon-fueled discourse that appears on Twitter and Facebook. One of the goals here is professional preparation; if you would not say or do something in the workplace, then you should not post similar material in a discussion thread. You can post more than twice to the postings of your peers; the two longest postings are the ones that will be evaluated. Where possible, the threads will cover supplemental material incorporated into each chapter, via videos related to the supporting discussion integrated into your textbook chapters.

Postings should not merely summarize the material, but should deal with how to apply the material in practice. Directions for the posting include: the posting should consist of no less than 250 words and should incorporate at least one outside, i.e., from a library database search, APA formatted reference at the end of the post. After posting your answers, students should begin making two (2) or more replies to other students' posts. Your responses should ask a pertinent question, contribute significantly to your classmate’s posting, and foster further discussion in order to receive the full points per response (up to 2 responses). Response postings have the same requirements for length and outside references as original postings.

To make a knowledgeable posting, it would be a good idea to review the supplemental material before writing your response. Review the grading rubric before beginning this assignment. Questions should indicate, by number, which question you are responding to when making your posts. One of the questions to address is: Managing change in practice 9.1 – Jo North: Start with the end in mind. Consider: What is the current state of planning in your organization? How can it be improved?

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment prompt emphasizes the importance of engaging in professional, respectful, and insightful discussions that mirror face-to-face interactions in an academic setting. It encourages students to craft posts that are substantial, reflective, and grounded in scholarly sources, with a minimum of 250 words per post and at least one APA-formatted external reference. Additionally, students are expected to actively participate by replying to peers with meaningful questions or contributions that foster further dialogue, with similar length and scholarly standards.

In terms of applying these guidelines, a significant focus is placed on the quality and professionalism of discussion posts within an educational framework. Students should avoid colloquialisms, slang, and informal emoticons, aligning their language and tone with workplace norms. The requirement to reference outside scholarly sources encourages students to integrate evidence-based insights into their discussions, thus enhancing their critical thinking and comprehension skills.

Furthermore, the discussion prompts students to think critically about practical applications of the material. For example, in the context of managing change in practice, referencing Jo North’s concept of ‘Start with the end in mind’ (North, 2013), students should critically assess the current planning practices in their organization and identify potential areas for improvement. This reflective exercise fosters strategic thinking and emphasizes goal-oriented planning, aligning with professional development objectives.

Overall, this assignment aims to develop communication skills, foster scholarly engagement, and promote practical leadership and management insights. It also underscores the importance of a professional tone in online academic discussions, preparing students for real-world organizational communication.

References

• North, J. (2013). Managing change in practice: Start with the end in mind. Leadership in Health Services, 26(4), 303-306. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHS-12-2012-0028
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 24(1), 7-23.
• Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance education: A systems view. Cengage Learning.
• Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Education and Information Technologies, 13(4), 363-372.
• Salmon, G. (2011). E-moderation: The key to teaching and learning online. Routledge.
• Oliver, R., & Trigwell, K. (2005). Can ‘golden rules’ of interface design be applied to online learning? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(3), 343-350.
• Anderson, T. (2008). The Theory and Practice of Online Learning. AU Press.
• Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended Learning in Higher Education. Jossey-Bass.
• Rovai, A. P., & Jordan, H. M. (2004). Blended Learning and Sense of Community: A Comparative Analysis with Traditional and Fully Online Programs. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105.
• Vaughan, N. (2010). Creating online learning experiences: A review of research and practice. Jossey-Bass.