Is 365 Writing Rubric Last Updated January 15, 2018 Students

Is 365 Writing Rubric Last Updated January 15 2018student Score

The provided document appears to be a rubric designed to assess the quality of written work based on various criteria such as persuasiveness, evidence and support, word choices, language, and formatting. Additionally, it includes excerpts from chapters on writing collaboratively, ethical and legal considerations, social media use, and intercultural communication. The rubric differentiates between higher and lower quality work for each criterion, emphasizing the importance of logical coherence, authoritative sources, clear language, professional formatting, and ethical practices in writing. The document also offers guidance on collaboration strategies, conduct in meetings, diplomatic communication, critique methods, use of technology in collaborative writing, and ethical considerations related to social media, trademarks, and legal issues. Its purpose seems to serve as a comprehensive evaluation tool for academic or professional writing, integrating best practices and standards across multiple aspects of effective, ethical, and technologically-supported communication.

Paper For Above instruction

The Rubric and Guidelines for Effective and Ethical Writing: An Analytical Overview

The transition from quality assessment rubrics to comprehensive guidelines for effective writing encompasses a broad spectrum of criteria that reflect the core principles of academic and professional communication. The rubric titled "Is 365 Writing Rubric Last Updated January 15, 2018," offers a detailed framework for evaluating written work, emphasizing critical elements such as persuasiveness, evidentiary support, linguistic clarity, formatting professionalism, and ethical considerations. Each criterion is stratified into higher and lower quality standards, underscoring the importance of logical coherence, authoritative sourcing, and adherence to ethical norms in producing credible, impactful documents.

Assessment of Writing Quality

Fundamentally, persuasiveness constitutes the cornerstone of compelling documents. It hinges on robust critical reasoning, judicious use of sources, and an openness to alternative viewpoints. Exceptional writing demonstrates clarity and coherence that persuade the audience, fostering confidence in the author’s conclusions. Conversely, deficiencies in logic or source review cast doubt on the credibility of the work, impeding effective communication. Similarly, evidence and support derive their strength from the authoritative relevance of sources, meticulous citation practices, and comprehensive research, all of which lend confidence and legitimacy to the work presented.

Language and Formatting

Language quality involves precise word choices, fluid logic, and well-structured sentences and paragraphs, creating an engaging and readable experience. Errors in grammar, punctuation, or spelling diminish readability and threaten the document's credibility. Professional formatting—consistent heading styles, appropriate fonts, margins, and effective use of tables and graphics—further enhances readability and demonstrates a commitment to presentation standards. Such attention to detail ensures that the document maintains a professional appearance that facilitates understanding.

Ethical and Legal Considerations in Writing

Beyond technical competence, ethical and legal considerations are integral to responsible communication. Upstream obligations include honesty, transparency, confidentiality, and respect for intellectual property rights, such as trademarks and copyrights. The rubric emphasizes adherence to fair use policies, sourcing norms, and respect for privacy, especially within digital environments like social media. Ethical communication also entails sensitivity across cultures, recognizing cultural differences in expression, criticism, and collaboration practices.

Collaboration and Technology in Writing

The chapters on collaborative writing and technological tools advocate for strategic project management, effective meetings, diplomatic communication, and constructive critique. It highlights the benefits of collaboration—wider knowledge base, shared skills, and improved communication—while acknowledging potential disadvantages such as time consumption and interpersonal conflicts. Managing collaborative projects requires broken-down tasks, active scheduling, written decision records, and flexible responsibilities. Technology, including word processors' comment, revision, and highlighting features, along with tools such as videoconferencing, wikis, and social media, support efficient teamwork. However, professionals must navigate issues like technical proficiency, digital etiquette, and cross-cultural sensitivity.

Cross-Cultural and Ethical Communication

Special consideration is given to international collaboration, where cultural differences such as reluctance to assert, criticize, or perform creatively influence team dynamics. Ethical communication principles advocate for truthfulness, transparency, non-discrimination, and compliance with relevant legal and societal norms. Companies are advised to respect local laws, avoid reinforcing stereotypes, and maintain a professional online presence. Ethical guidelines extend into social media conduct, intellectual property rights, and responsible advertising. Overall, fostering an ethical organizational culture through leadership, reinforcement, and policies ensures adherence to high standards of integrity and respect in communication practices.

Conclusion

In sum, the rubric and accompanying chapters form a comprehensive blueprint for effective, ethical, and technologically adept writing and collaboration. They serve as pedagogical tools guiding individuals in producing credible, persuasive, and culturally sensitive documents, while ensuring compliance with legal standards. Emphasizing the importance of critical reasoning, authoritative sourcing, ethical integrity, and technological proficiency, these guidelines aim to elevate both individual and organizational communication to professional excellence.

References

• American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
• Baron, N. S. (2008). Always on: Language in an online and mobile world. Oxford University Press.
• Baehr, P. (2019). Ethical communication in the digital age. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(2), 271-284.
• Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2016). Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press.
• Guffey, M. E., & Loewy, D. (2018). Business communication: Process and product. Cengage Learning.
• Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Sage publications.
• Johnson, C. E. (2019). Meeting the ethical challenges of leadership. Sage Publications.
• McMillan, S. J., & Hwang, J. (2023). Social media in organizations: Ethics and best practices. Journal of Business Communication, 60(1), 50-68.
• Roberts, K. H., & Bowers, C. A. (2018). Organizational culture and ethical behavior. Journal of Organizational Culture, 22(4), 457-472.
• Ward, S., & Taylor, P. (2014). Using technology to enhance collaboration in academic writing. Journal of Higher Education, 85(3), 323-347.