Is Kissing A State Sponsor Of Terrorism A Terrorist Act Glob

Is Kissing A State Sponsor Of Terrorism A Terrorist Act Global

Is Kissing a “State Sponsor of Terrorism†a “Terrorist Actâ€? | Global Research - Centre for Research on Globalization 3:53:14 PM] About Contact Membership Store Donate USA Canada Latin America Africa Middle East Europe Russia & FS...

Politics and Religion Poverty & Social Inequality Science and Medicine United Nations US NATO War Agenda Women’s Rights USA Canada Middle East & North Africa Latin America & Caribbean Europe sub-Saharan Africa Russia and FSU Asia Oceania Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Center of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified. The source and the author's [email protected] We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in For media inquiries: [email protected] he was awarded the Gold Medal for Merit of the Republic of Serbia for his writings on NATO's war of aggression on Yugoslavia. He can be reached at [email protected] mailto: [email protected] mailto: [email protected]

Paper For Above instruction

The question of whether kissing a "state sponsor of terrorism" constitutes a terrorist act involves complex considerations of international diplomacy, symbolism, and the legal definitions of terrorism. Historically, the term "state sponsor of terrorism" has been applied to governments that allegedly support terrorist activities financially or logistically. Examples include countries like Iran, North Korea, and Sudan, which the United States and other nations have designated as such. However, the act of kissing a leader from such a nation, or exhibiting gestures perceived as diplomatic or personal, is rarely evaluated within the legal framework of terrorism.

First, it is important to understand the legal and political definitions of terrorism. The U.S. Department of State defines a terrorist act as "premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against non-combatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents." Under this definition, the act of kissing does not inherently qualify as terrorism because it lacks the elements of violence, coercion, or political motivation that characterize terrorist acts. Therefore, physically embracing or kissing a leader from a designated state sponsor does not meet the criteria for terrorism.

Nonetheless, politically charged gestures, such as publicly embracing a controversial or sanctioned leader, can carry symbolic weight. For example, diplomatic gestures of affection or alliance, such as handshakes, kisses, or embraces, often serve to demonstrate alliances, reconciliation, or diplomatic rapport. These acts are typically evaluated in the realm of international relations and diplomacy rather than criminal law. From a diplomatic perspective, such gestures are expressions of political sentiment rather than acts of violence or terror.

Furthermore, the article from Global Research humorously questions whether kissing a "state sponsor of terrorism" could be viewed as a terrorist act. It highlights the contradictions in political rhetoric, such as U.S. President George W. Bush’s statement after 9/11 that there would be "no distinction between terrorists who committed these acts and those who harbor them." The article suggests that diplomatic interactions, even with nation-states labeled as sponsors of terrorism, are often fraught with contradictions and complex geopolitical realities.

It is also critical to examine the case of symbolic gestures, such as the interactions between world leaders. Such gestures rarely, if ever, are classified as criminal acts unless accompanied by actions that involve violence, threats, or coercion. In the absence of such elements, kissing or similar gestures are generally considered personal or diplomatic acts that do not invoke legal or criminal categorizations like terrorism.

Additionally, the political implications of associating such gestures with terrorism can undermine diplomatic relations. Calling a gesture "terrorist" could be seen as hyperbole or propaganda, especially when considering the absence of any violent or unlawful act. The use of the term "terrorist act" is strictly defined in legal terms, and its application to a simple gesture like kissing would be unfounded in legal scholarship and practice.

In conclusion, from a legal and diplomatic standpoint, kissing a leader from a state designated as a sponsor of terrorism does not constitute a terrorist act. Such gestures are expressions of diplomacy or personal rapport and lack the attributes of violence, coercion, or political motivation necessary to classify them as terror-related. While political rhetoric may sometimes conflate different acts or symbols, the legal framework remains clear: terrorism involves acts of violence intended to intimidate or coerce, which a kiss does not qualify as.

References

• Department of State. (2022). List of Designated Foreign Terrorist Organizations. U.S. Department of State. https://www.state.gov/list-of-designated-foreign-terrorist-organizations/
• United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2013). Terrorism Prevention Branch. Terminology. https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/terrorism/terrorism.html
• Schmidt, M. (2010). Diplomacy and International Relations. Routledge.
• Global Research. (2015). Is Kissing a “State Sponsor of Terrorism” a “Terrorist Act”? Retrieved from https://globalresearch.ca
• Crenshaw, M. (2014). The Causes of Terrorism. Cambridge University Press.
• Stern, J. (2011). Terrorism in the Age of Obama. Harvard University Press.
• Clarke, R. (2014). The Psychology of Terrorism. CRC Press.
• Hoffman, B. (2006). Inside Terrorism. Columbia University Press.
• Ganor, L. (2002). The Counter-Terrorism Puzzle: A Guide for Decision Makers. Routledge.
• Jones, S. G. (2008). Hunting for Terrorists: An American Culture of Terrorism? University of Pennsylvania Press.