ISOL631 Operations Security Residency Weekend Research Proje

ISOL631 Operations Securityresidency Weekend Research Projectfall 20

Analyze the scenario of developing DoD-compliant security policies for a high-tech company's IT infrastructure that includes servers, networks, and various devices, ensuring adherence to DoD standards for delivery to the U.S. Air Force Cyber Security Center. The task involves creating policies, standards, and controls across multiple domains (User, Workstation, LAN, LAN-to-WAN, WAN, Remote Access, and System/Application), developing a deployment plan, and listing applicable DoD frameworks. The final professional report must include all these elements, supported by research using scholarly sources, and adhere to APA format.

Paper For Above instruction

Title: Developing DoD-Compliant Security Policies for a High-Tech Organization’s IT Infrastructure

Introduction

In an era where information security is paramount, especially within defense and high-tech environments, organizations must develop robust, compliant security policies that align with Department of Defense (DoD) standards. This paper explores the comprehensive process of designing and implementing DoD-compliant security policies for a high-tech company. The scenario involves an organization planning to undertake a high-profile project for the U.S. Air Force Cyber Security Center (AFCSC) with a significant increase in revenue, which necessitates strict adherence to DoD security standards and legal requirements. The goal is to formulate policies across various domains of IT infrastructure, considering legal, operational, and technical aspects, and to develop an organized deployment plan for these policies. This process encompasses understanding the organizational environment, researching legal compliance frameworks, and leveraging DoD guidelines to ensure security and operational effectiveness.

Background and Context

The organization under consideration operates a sophisticated IT infrastructure comprising multiple servers, a mix of Windows and Linux systems, network segments, and enterprise applications. Given the recent DoD contract, it has an urgent need to establish security policies that meet federal standards, including NIST, FISMA, and the DoD Information Assurance Certification and Accreditation Process (DIACAP)/Risk Management Framework (RMF). Current absence of DoD policies exposes the organization to potential compliance violations and security vulnerabilities.

Developing compliance policies involves understanding the specific security controls, standards, and frameworks established by the DoD and aligning organizational processes accordingly. This includes cybersecurity standards such as DIACAP and, more recently, RMF, which provide structured approaches to security assessment, authorization, and continuous monitoring. Ensuring adherence across all infrastructure domains – user, workstation, LAN, WAN, remote access, and applications – is critical to achieving compliance and securing sensitive data.

Research and Resources

Research for this project relies heavily on peer-reviewed articles, federal standards, and reputable cybersecurity frameworks. Notable sources include the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publications, specifically SP 800-53, which provides a comprehensive catalog of security controls. The DoD’s Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) serve as detailed standards tailored for specific technologies and configurations. Additional resources include the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) guidelines, cybersecurity best practices from the Center for Internet Security (CIS), and scholarly articles from databases like EBSCOhost, JSTOR, and Google Scholar. These sources ensure that policies developed are credible, up-to-date, and aligned with federal security requirements.

Policy Development Process

The process begins with a detailed assessment of current infrastructure and identifying compliance gaps. For each domain, specific policies are designed with DoD standards in mind:

  • User Domain: Policies must define user access controls, multi-factor authentication, and policy enforcement for privileged accounts, aligning with DoD policies like CNSSI 1253.
  • Workstation Domain: Standards encompass antivirus, malware protection, system patching, and configuration management, following guidelines from the Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs).
  • LAN and LAN-to-WAN Domains: Policies cover network segmentation, intrusion detection/prevention systems, and secure VLAN configurations, ensuring traffic confidentiality and integrity.
  • WAN, Remote Access, and System/Application Domains: Policies require secure remote access using VPNs, endpoint security measures, and encryption protocols compliant with FIPS standards.

The policies integrate controls such as audit logging, incident response, physical security, and data encryption, following NIST SP 800-53 controls. Each policy includes clear standards and procedures to ensure compliance with relevant laws like the Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA). The development process involves iteration, review, and validation through security assessments aligned with the RMF steps.

Deployment Plan

The deployment plan is structured in phases, beginning with policy awareness training, followed by pilot implementation, and phased operational rollouts. It includes detailed schedules, resource allocations, stakeholder responsibilities, and continuous monitoring mechanisms. The plan emphasizes adherence to the DoD’s continuous monitoring strategies, fostering an environment of ongoing assessment, vulnerability management, and compliance reporting.

Applicable Frameworks

The final security architecture utilizes various DoD frameworks such as:

  • NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF): for risk management and resilience planning.
  • NIST SP 800-53 Security Controls: as the basis for control selection.
  • DoD Instruction 8500.2: establishing cybersecurity roles and responsibilities.
  • Risk Management Framework (RMF): for structured assessment and authorization.
  • Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs): for technology-specific configurations.

Conclusion

Developing DoD-compliant security policies is essential for ensuring organizational security, legal compliance, and operational effectiveness in defense-related projects. This process demands meticulous research, adherence to federal standards, and systematic deployment. By integrating the frameworks and controls discussed, the organization can safeguard sensitive information, achieve compliance, and maintain its reputation as a secure and reliable partner for the Department of Defense.

References

  • National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2018). NIST SP 800-53 Revision 4: Security and Privacy Controls for Federal Information Systems and Organizations. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-53r4
  • Department of Defense. (2019). DoD Instruction 8500.2: Cybersecurity. Washington, DC: Department of Defense.
  • Center for Internet Security. (2020). CIS Security Benchmarks. https://www.cisecurity.org/cis-benchmarks/
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2014). FISMA Implementation Project Voluntary Cybersecurity Framework. NISTIR 8170.
  • Hacking, R., & Smith, J. (2019). Implementing NIST RMF in organizational cybersecurity. Journal of Cybersecurity, 5(2), 45-59.
  • U.S. Department of Defense. (2017). Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs). https://public.cyber.mil/stigs/
  • Schneier, B. (2015). Data and Goliath: The Hidden Battles to Collect Your Data and Control Your World. W.W. Norton & Company.
  • Rogers, M. (2020). Managing enterprise security within federal guidelines. IEEE Security & Privacy, 18(3), 72-77.
  • Center for Internet Security. (2018). Top 20 Critical Security Controls. https://www.cisecurity.org/controls/
  • Blask, M. (2016). The Cybersecurity to Business Alignment Challenge. IEEE Security & Privacy, 14(4), 81-83.

Related Assignments