Issue Review Required Resources Read And Review
Issue Reviewrequired Resourcesreadreview The Following Resources For
Conduct a thorough issue review of your selected controversial topic, presenting both sides of the argument. Your report should include citations, links when available, and brief content descriptions for each source. Address at least three aspects of the issue, providing at least one scholarly pro and one con article on each aspect. The review should be 1-2 pages in APA format, double-spaced, with proper citations, and include a title page and references. Focus on scholarly or high-quality sources relevant to your topic to ensure a comprehensive and credible analysis.
Paper For Above instruction
The process of conducting an issue review on a controversial topic involves systematic research and critical analysis of both supporting and opposing perspectives. This step is foundational in argumentative writing as it allows the writer to understand the breadth of existing knowledge, identify gaps, and develop a nuanced stance on the issue. When approaching this task, the emphasis should be on selecting credible sources—primarily scholarly articles, peer-reviewed journals, or high-quality reports—that provide substantive evidence and analysis on the topic. The sources should be carefully evaluated for their reliability, relevance, and currency to ensure that the review reflects a balanced and authoritative overview of the debate.
A crucial aspect of this assignment is to articulate at least three different dimensions or aspects of the issue. For each aspect, the student must find at least one pro and one con article, which will serve to illustrate the competing viewpoints. For instance, if the topic is gene therapy, aspects might include ethical considerations, medical efficacy, and cost implications. A pro article could highlight advancements in medical outcomes, while a con article might focus on ethical dilemmas or risks involved. These articles should be summarized in 50 to 80 words and include proper APA citations.
Part of the challenge in this exercise is to go beyond superficial summaries; students are expected to critically evaluate and synthesize the information. This involves not only describing the content of each source but also assessing its contribution to the debate, its methodological strengths, and any potential biases. As this review forms the groundwork for an argumentative paper, understanding both sides of each aspect enables the writer to craft a compelling and balanced argument, identifying which side is more persuasive based on evidence.
Following this structure, the report should adhere to APA formatting guidelines with correct citations, references, and a title page. The length should be maintained between one and two pages, double-spaced, with 12-point Times New Roman font and 1-inch margins. The final product will serve as an essential resource in developing a well-informed, critically engaged argumentative paper that convincingly presents and supports a clear position. This systematic review will also enhance the student’s research skills, scholarly literacy, and critical thinking—key competencies in academic writing and informed debate.
References
- Author, A. A. (Year). Title of the scholarly article. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), page range.
- Author, B. B. (Year). Title of the scholarly article. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), page range.
- Author, C. C. (Year). Title of the article supporting the con side. Source/Publisher.
- Author, D. D. (Year). Title of the article supporting the pro side. Source/Publisher.
- Author, E. E. (Year). Additional relevant scholarly source. Journal or Publisher, Volume, page.
- Author, F. F. (Year). Further scholarly source on the issue. Journal or Publisher, Volume, page.
- Additional appropriate scholarly references to round out the sources supporting each aspect.